Literature DB >> 32993746

Metformin use and early lactate levels in critically ill patients according to chronic and acute renal impairment.

Rene A Posma1,2, Adam Hulman3, Reimar W Thomsen4, Bente Jespersen5, Maarten W Nijsten6, Christian F Christiansen4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute kidney injury; Chronic kidney disease; Critical care; Lactate; Metformin; Metformin-associated lactic acidosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32993746      PMCID: PMC7525933          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03300-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.

Main text

Metformin is the most widely used oral antihyperglycemic agent. Because it is eliminated unmodified in urine, patients with renal insufficiency can accumulate metformin and may develop lactic acidosis [1]. Recent guidelines only restrict the use of metformin in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) because the benefit is considered larger than the risk for lactic acidosis [2]. Lactate measurement has a central role in identifying and monitoring critical illness [3]. A better understanding of the impact of metformin on lactate levels could improve clinical assessment of the critically ill. Data were collected by combining data from Danish nationwide medical databases with laboratory data [4]. This multicenter cohort included all adults (≥ 18 years) hospitalized and surviving 24 h of intensive care unit (ICU) treatment in northern Denmark between January 2010 and August 2017. We required ≥ 3 lactate measurements between 6 h before until 24 h after ICU admission, with ≥ 12 h between first and last measurement. Patients receiving dialysis before ICU admission were excluded. Metformin use was defined as a filled prescription for metformin within 90 days before ICU admission [4]. CKD stage was assessed by the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 365 days until 7 days before ICU admission [5]. Acute kidney injury (AKI) within 24 h after ICU admission was defined and staged according to the KDIGO creatinine criteria. Lactate trajectories over time for metformin users and nonusers were fitted by a mixed-effects model assuming unstructured covariance and including individual-level random intercept and slope. Time was modeled as a natural cubic spline with knot locations at − 1 h, + 4 h, and + 12 h relative to ICU admission. Time-by-group interaction was entered as a covariate, and analyses were subsequently stratified by eGFR level or AKI stage. Differences in maximum lactate level with 95% confidence intervals between metformin users and nonusers were model-based. We studied 20,741 patients with a total of 209,394 lactate measurements, of whom 1905 (9%) patients used metformin (Table 1). Compared with nonusers, metformin users had a similar preadmission eGFR but had more often AKI stage 2 or 3. Metformin users had 0.61 (0.45–0.77) mmol/L higher maximum lactate levels than nonusers (Fig. 1a). This difference was highest for patients with eGFR ≤ 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 (1.06 [0.72–1.39] mmol/L; Fig. 1b). Differences in maximum lactate levels between metformin users and nonusers were more pronounced in patients with AKI stage 2 or 3 (Fig. 1c), with a difference of 0.30 (0.15–0.45) mmol/L for patients without AKI, and 0.12 (− 0.24 to 0.48), 1.00 (0.35–1.65), and 1.75 (1.03–2.47) mmol/L among patients with AKI stage 1, 2, or 3, respectively. The difference between metformin users and nonusers disappeared within 24 h of ICU admission. However, the time until this difference disappeared was longer for patients with moderate to severe CKD or AKI (Fig. 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of metformin users and nonusers

CharacteristicTotal (N = 20,741)Metformin users (N = 1905)Metformin nonusers (N = 18,836)SMD*
Age, median [IQR], years69 [58–77]70 [63–76]69 [58–77]0.24
Male sex11,697 (56)1193 (63)10,504 (56)0.14
Charlson Comorbidity Index0.52
 06894 (33)305 (16)6589 (35)
 1 or 28147 (39)737 (39)7410 (39)
 3 or higher5700 (27)863 (45)4837 (26)
Diabetes mellitus4594 (22)1903 (100)2691 (14)3.45
 Sulfonylureas476 (2)250 (13)226 (1)0.48
 Insulin1473 (7)443 (23)1030 (5)0.52
 Other antihyperglycemic agents445 (2)259 (14)186 (1)0.50
Preadmission eGFR, median [IQR], ml/min/1.73 m280 [58–95]77 [58–92]80 [58–95]0.07
 ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m212,892 (62)1345 (71)11,547 (61)0.48
 45–60 ml/min/1.73 m22189 (11)278 (15)1911 (10)
 ≤ 45 ml/min/1.73 m22442 (12)221 (12)2221 (12)
 Missing3218 (16)61 (3)3157 (17)
ICU admission type0.20
 Medical9942 (48)1019 (53)8923 (47)
 Emergency surgical6344 (31)456 (24)5888 (31)
 Elective surgical3149 (15)345 (18)2804 (15)
 Missing1306 (6)85 (4)1221 (6)
Time from hospital admission to ICU admission, median [IQR], h5.1 [0.0–30.5]5.3 [0.0–29.4]5.1 [0.0–30.7]0.06
SAPS-II score, median [IQR]40 [30–52]42 [31–53]40 [30–52]0.09
 Missing11,456 (55)1024 (54)10,432 (55)
Mechanical ventilation9305 (45)815 (43)8490 (45)0.05
Inotropes or vasopressors8943 (43)854 (45)8089 (43)0.04
Renal replacement therapy1257 (6)152 (8)1105 (6)0.09
AKI stage within 24 h0.47
 No AKI10,597 (51)982 (52)9615 (51)
 13584 (17)388 (20)3196 (17)
 21436 (7)198 (10)1238 (7)
 31877 (9)261 (14)1616 (9)
 Missing3247 (16)76 (4)3171 (17)
30-day mortality4367 (21)346 (18)4021 (21)0.08

Data are expressed as no. (%) or median [IQR]

*As general guidance, it is suggested that effect sizes are likely to be “small” when an SMD approximates 0.2, likely to be “medium” when an SMD is 0.5, and “large” when an SMD is higher than 0.8

†In total, data are missing for 19 (0.1%) patients

SMD standardized mean difference, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, ICU intensive care unit, SAPS-II Simple Acute Physiology Score II, AKI acute kidney injury

Fig. 1

Lactate levels for metformin users and nonusers according to estimated glomerular filtration rate and acute kidney injury stage. Mean lactate trajectories over time with 95% confidence interval for metformin users and nonusers were fitted by a mixed-effect model with individual-level random intercept and slope. Time after ICU admission was modeled as natural cubic spline with knot location at − 1 h, + 4 h, and + 12 h surrounding intensive care unit admission. a Total population. Subsequently, analyses were stratified according to b chronic kidney disease stage based on mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 1 year before ICU admission or c acute kidney injury (AKI) stage within 24 h of ICU admission

Characteristics of metformin users and nonusers Data are expressed as no. (%) or median [IQR] *As general guidance, it is suggested that effect sizes are likely to be “small” when an SMD approximates 0.2, likely to be “medium” when an SMD is 0.5, and “large” when an SMD is higher than 0.8 †In total, data are missing for 19 (0.1%) patients SMD standardized mean difference, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, ICU intensive care unit, SAPS-II Simple Acute Physiology Score II, AKI acute kidney injury Lactate levels for metformin users and nonusers according to estimated glomerular filtration rate and acute kidney injury stage. Mean lactate trajectories over time with 95% confidence interval for metformin users and nonusers were fitted by a mixed-effect model with individual-level random intercept and slope. Time after ICU admission was modeled as natural cubic spline with knot location at − 1 h, + 4 h, and + 12 h surrounding intensive care unit admission. a Total population. Subsequently, analyses were stratified according to b chronic kidney disease stage based on mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 1 year before ICU admission or c acute kidney injury (AKI) stage within 24 h of ICU admission In this large cohort of critically ill patients, metformin users had higher lactate levels than nonusers in the early phase of critical illness, which disappeared within 24 h of ICU admission. Importantly, the difference in lactate levels between metformin users and nonusers was higher in patients with more severe AKI, while the difference was almost similar across preadmission eGFR subgroups. This may be explained by reduced clearance of metformin or lactate, or both. A limitation is that blood metformin concentrations were unavailable to confirm this because such correlation was found in patients receiving renal replacement therapy for metformin-associated lactic acidosis [6]. The monitoring of lactate trajectories is recommended during critical illness [3]. Awareness of factors affecting this biomarker will improve its interpretation. We report that the association of metformin use with increased lactate levels is more pronounced in patients who develop AKI stage 2 or 3 than in patients without AKI or who develop AKI stage 1.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Silvio E Inzucchi; Kasia J Lipska; Helen Mayo; Clifford J Bailey; Darren K McGuire
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014 Dec 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Estimating baseline kidney function in hospitalized patients with impaired kidney function.

Authors:  Edward D Siew; T Alp Ikizler; Michael E Matheny; Yaping Shi; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Ioana Danciu; Jamie P Dwyer; Manakan Srichai; Adriana M Hung; James P Smith; Josh F Peterson
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 Update.

Authors:  Mitchell M Levy; Laura E Evans; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 4.  Serum lactate level and mortality in metformin-associated lactic acidosis requiring renal replacement therapy: a systematic review of case reports and case series.

Authors:  Hung-Chieh Yeh; I-Wen Ting; Ching-Wei Tsai; Jenn-Yu Wu; Chin-Chi Kuo
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.388

5.  Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Authors:  Melanie J Davies; David A D'Alessio; Judith Fradkin; Walter N Kernan; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Apostolos Tsapas; Deborah J Wexler; John B Buse
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Prognostic impact of elevated lactate levels on mortality in critically ill patients with and without preadmission metformin treatment: a Danish registry-based cohort study.

Authors:  Rene A Posma; Trine Frøslev; Bente Jespersen; Iwan C C van der Horst; Daan J Touw; Reimar W Thomsen; Maarten W Nijsten; Christian F Christiansen
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 6.925

  6 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Protection by metformin against severe Covid-19: An in-depth mechanistic analysis.

Authors:  Nicolas Wiernsperger; Abdallah Al-Salameh; Bertrand Cariou; Jean-Daniel Lalau
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 8.254

2.  Does the Same Hyperlactatemia Cut-Off in the Context of Acute Diseases Hold the Same Meaning in Diabetes Mellitus?

Authors:  Inês H Vieira; Maja Petrova; José P Moura
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.