Literature DB >> 3299370

Tumor cell heterogeneity: divided-colony assay for measuring drug response.

T Kuczek, D E Axelrod.   

Abstract

In vitro tests for predicting the response of tumors to chemotherapeutic agents might be improved if they were modified to take into account tumor-cell heterogeneity. We have studied the heterogeneity of cellular growth rate and drug response in mouse fibroblast NIH 3T3 cells and in NIH 3T3 cells transformed with the human HRAS gene (homologue of the Harvey sarcoma virus oncogene v-Ha-ras) from the EJ human bladder carcinoma cell line. Growth-rate heterogeneity was detected as a broad distribution of numbers of cells per colony. In spite of this heterogeneity, secondary colonies have numbers of cells per colony that resemble that of the primary colony from which they were derived. The variance between unrelated secondary colonies is increased by HRASEJ. Colony-size measurements are reliable because primary colonies divided in half formed two groups of secondary colonies (on two separate plates) that had indistinguishable mean colony sizes. Based on these observations, a divided-colony procedure was devised to detect the drug response of heterogeneous cell populations. Primary colonies are divided into two groups of cells, one of which is treated with a drug and the other is left untreated as a control. The size distribution of treated secondary colonies is then compared to that of the untreated control and to that of the primary colony from which it was derived. The divided-colony procedure is proposed as a modification of the human-tumor-cloning system to increase the sensitivity and reliability of in vitro procedures used to determine the drug response of heterogeneous tumor-cell populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3299370      PMCID: PMC305115          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.84.13.4490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  38 in total

Review 1.  Tumor heterogeneity.

Authors:  G H Heppner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  The forty-year-old mutation theory of Luria and Delbrück and its pertinence to cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  H E Skipper
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 6.242

3.  A kinetic and clonal analysis of heterogeneity in K562 cells.

Authors:  S Alder; A Ciampi; E A McCulloch
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Analysis of variability in albumin content of sister hepatoma cells and a model for geometric phenotypic variability (quantitative shift model).

Authors:  J A Peterson
Journal:  Somat Cell Mol Genet       Date:  1984-07

5.  Molecular cloning and the total nucleotide sequence of the human c-Ha-ras-1 gene activated in a melanoma from a Japanese patient.

Authors:  T Sekiya; M Fushimi; H Hori; S Hirohashi; S Nishimura; T Sugimura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Heterogeneity in drug sensitivity among tumor cell subpopulations of a single mammary tumor.

Authors:  G H Heppner; D L Dexter; T DeNucci; F R Miller; P Calabresi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  A mutagen-testing assay based on heterogeneity in diameter and integrated optical density of mammalian cell colonies.

Authors:  S H Dairkee; D A Glaser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Heterogeneity in growth pattern and drug sensitivity of primary tumor and metastases in the human tumor colony-forming assay.

Authors:  P Schlag; W Schreml
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Transforming genes of human hematopoietic tumors: frequent detection of ras-related oncogenes whose activation appears to be independent of tumor phenotype.

Authors:  A Eva; S R Tronick; R A Gol; J H Pierce; S A Aaronson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Comparison of drug sensitivity among tumor cells within a tumor, between primary tumor and metastases, and between different metastases in the human tumor colony-forming assay.

Authors:  N Tanigawa; Y Mizuno; T Hashimura; K Honda; K Satomura; Y Hikasa; O Niwa; T Sugahara; O Yoshida; D H Kern
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  5 in total

1.  The combined effect of encapsulating curcumin and C6 ceramide in liposomal nanoparticles against osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Santosh S Dhule; Patrice Penfornis; Jibao He; Michael R Harris; Treniece Terry; Vijay John; Radhika Pochampally
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Avoiding Pitfalls in the Statistical Analysis of Heterogeneous Tumors.

Authors:  David E Axelrod; Naomi Miller; Judith-Anne W Chapman
Journal:  Biomed Inform Insights       Date:  2009-01-01

3.  The impact of phenotypic heterogeneity of tumour cells on treatment and relapse dynamics.

Authors:  Michael Raatz; Saumil Shah; Guranda Chitadze; Monika Brüggemann; Arne Traulsen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  High-throughput 3D screening reveals differences in drug sensitivities between culture models of JIMT1 breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Vesa Hongisto; Sandra Jernström; Vidal Fey; John-Patrick Mpindi; Kristine Kleivi Sahlberg; Olli Kallioniemi; Merja Perälä
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Hedgehog signaling sensitizes glioma stem cells to endogenous nano-irradiation.

Authors:  Agnieszka Morgenroth; Andreas T J Vogg; Katja Ermert; Boris Zlatopolskiy; Felix M Mottaghy
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-07-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.