Literature DB >> 32992458

Attraction of Adults of Cyclocephala lunulata and Cyclocephala barrerai (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea: Melolonthidae) towards Bacteria Volatiles Isolated from Their Genital Chambers.

Abraham Sanchez-Cruz1, Norma Robledo1, María Rosete-Enríquez2, Angel A Romero-López3.   

Abstract

In the study of the chemical communication of adults of the Melolonthidae family, bacteria have been observed in the epithelium of the genital chamber; possibly, bacteria are involved in the production of sex attractants in their hosts. Therefore, it is important to identify the volatile organic compounds from bacteria (VOCsB) released by these microorganisms and study the biological activity stimulated by VOBCs in adults of Melolonthidae. In this study, bacteria were isolated from the genital chamber of Cyclocephala lunulata and Cyclocephala barrerai, from which VOCsB were extracted using static headspace solid-phase microextraction (SHS-SPME) and dynamic headspace Super Q solid-phase extraction (DHS-SPE) and analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The effect of VOCsB on the hosts and conspecifics was evaluated utilizing an olfactometer and electroantennography (EAG). Two species of Enterobacteria were isolated from the genital chamber of each female species, and VOCsB derived from sulfur-containing compounds, alcohols, esters, and fatty acids were identified. An attraction response was observed in olfactometry studies, and antennal responses to VOCsB were confirmed in EAG bioassays. With these results, new perspectives on the relationship between these beetles and their bacteria emerge, in addition to establishing a basis for management programs in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cyclocephala; EAG; attraction; bioassays; microbial natural products discovery; volatile organic compounds from bacteria

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32992458      PMCID: PMC7582287          DOI: 10.3390/molecules25194430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Molecules        ISSN: 1420-3049            Impact factor:   4.411


1. Introduction

Several genera of the Melolonthidae family as phytophages are pests of various crops [1,2]; among these is the genus Cyclocephala [3], which has been the less-studied of the family. Members of this genus are widely distributed across the Americas [4], and species such as Cyclocephala lunulata and Cyclocephala barrerai are important pests of diverse plant species like strawberry, guava, and ornamental pastures [2,5,6]. For the monitoring and management of these beetle species, studies have been carried out to take advantage of the substances involved in intraspecific interactions [7,8,9,10], focusing on volatile organic compounds involved in attracting a partner for copulation, such as sex pheromones [11,12]. Bacteria have been observed in the reproductive system of females of Melolonthidae, specifically in the accessory glands and the genital chamber-structures associated with sex pheromones production [10,11,12,13,14]. Based on this evidence, it has been suggested that bacteria participate in the production of these chemicals, such as in the case of Morganella morganii found in the accessory glands of female individuals of melolonthid Costelytra zealandica beetles. These microorganisms produce volatile organic compounds from bacteria (VOCsB) such as phenol, which has been reported as a component of the sex pheromone of C. zealandica [15,16]. The presence of the enterobacteria Klebsiella oxytoca and Klebsiella michiganensis have also been recorded in the genital chamber of Phyllophaga obsoleta, where a similar relationship may occur [17]. These relationships have not been studied in Cyclocephala (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea: Melolonthidae) [3]. Bacterial growth conditions, such as culture media, influence VOCsB diversity and abundance, so it is not appropriate to use general culture media to carry out studies of the production of VOCsB. Bacteria must be cultivated in specific culture media [18,19,20] containing 10% glucose and sulfur compounds, as the triple-sugar medium iron (TSI) allows the synthesis of a greater diversity of VOCsB [21]. In the extraction of VOCsB, static headspace solid-phase microextraction (SHS-SPME) has been used to capture these compounds; due to the sensitivity and how they adapt to the bacterial culture, the fibers that have been used in various studies are those of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), polyacrylate (PA), and/or divinylbenzene (DVB) for VOCsB of Enterobacteriaceae [22,23,24]. However, SHS-SPME is a destructive test, which limits its use in bioassays, so dynamic headspace Super Q solid-phase extraction (DHS-SPE) [25,26] is an alternative to obtain samples that can be tested in attraction bioassays; the two forms of extraction are followed by VOCsB identification by gas chromatographic mass-spectrometry (GC-MS) [19,24]. VOCsB, emitted by insect bacteria, play an important role in host chemical communication [27,28,29]. VOCsB identified in these interactions are hydrocarbons, ketones, alcohols, derivatives with nitrogen or sulfur, and terpenes [19,20]; these are involved in the chemical communication of various groups of insects [30,31]. In bioassays (olfactometer and flight tunnel), it has been observed that VOCsB may attract a single sex (sex attractant) or males and females (aggregation attractant) [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. Even though the attraction tests have served to know the biological response of insects to VOCsB, the antennal response they have towards VOCsB is unknown; tests such as electroantennography (EAG) are fundamental to link the behavioral response with the stimulation of the olfactory receptors [38,40,41]. Therefore, this study aimed at isolating and identifying bacteria from the genital chamber of female individuals of C. lunulata and C. barrerai to capture and identify the VOCsB they emit, in addition to studying the biological activity of these compounds in the insect hosts. This knowledge could contribute to the future management of these pests where VOCsB may be an important element.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Bacteria Isolated from the Genital Chamber of Cyclocephala

Two culturable bacterial strains were isolated from the genital chamber of C. lunulata that were identified as the Klebsiella sp. (GenBank accession number MT239565) and M. morganii (GenBank accession number MT239566). Two strains identified as K. oxytoca (GenBank accession number MG652605) and Citrobacter freundii (GenBank accession number MG652606) were isolated from the females of C. barrerai; the strains that demonstrated the closest matches with the NCBI database are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Identification of the bacterial strains isolated from the genital chamber of Cyclocephala lunulata and Cyclocephala barrerai by comparing the homologous sequences of the 16S rRNA gene.

Melolonthidae SpecieStrainClosest MatchesAccession no.Similarity (%)Phylogenetic AffiliationHost/Isolation Source
Cyclocephala lunulata Klebsiella sp. MT239565Klebsiella spallanzanii strain SPARK1058C2MN091365.1100EnterobacteriaceaeHomo sapiens(urine)
Klebsiella grimontii strain SS141CP044527.1100EnterobacteriaceaeCoffee cup
Klebsiella oxytoca strain 4928STDY7387762LR607363.1100EnterobacteriaceaeFeces
Morganella morganii MT239566 Morganella morganii strain FC6853MH628232.1100EnterobacteriaceaeHomo sapiens (patient)
Uncultured organism clone ELU0075-T355-S-NIPCRAMgANa_000386HQ774639.1100EnterobacteriaceaeHomo sapiens(gastrointestinal)
Morganella morganii subsp. morganii strain JY 16SKR094121.1100EnterobacteriaceaeMedical College, Soochow University
Cyclocephala barrerai Citrobacter freundiiCyl_Citf01MG652605Citrobacter freundiistrain FDAARGOS_61CP02604599EnterobacteriaceaeHomo sapiens(rectal swab)
Citrobacter freundiistrain BDCP01881099EnterobacteriaceaeBactrocera dorsalis (gut)
Citrobacter sp.PT2BGU45828399EnterobacteriaceaeReticulitermes speratus(gut)
Klebsiella oxytocaCyl_Kleb02MG652606Uncultured bacteriumJF208909100EnterobacteriaceaeHomo sapiens(skin)
Klebsiella oxytocastrain CAU9419MF42863299Enterobacteriaceaepickle
Klebsiella oxytocastrain NGB-FR100LC04919599EnterobacteriaceaeRoot nodules of fava bean
These bacteria grow in aerobic conditions using an enriched medium Luria Bertani (LB); the colonies are morphologically similar (Table 2) but show differences in the color and reflected light. Regarding individual characteristics, all are Gram-negative bacillus.
Table 2

Morphological characteristics of colonial and individual bacteria isolated from the genital chamber of females of Cyclocephala lunulata and Cyclocephala barrerai.

Morphology Cyclocephala lunulata Cyclocephala barrerai
Klebsiella sp. Morganella morganii Klebsiella oxytoca Citrobacter freundii
ShapeCircularCircularCircularCircular
EdgesRoundedRoundedRoundedRounded
ElevationConvexConvexConvexConvex
SurfaceSmoothSmoothSmoothSmooth
ConsistencyCreamyCreamyCreamyCreamy
PigmentationBeigeYellowBeigeYellow
Transmitted lightTranslucentTranslucentTranslucentTranslucent
Optical propertyIridescentBrilliantIridescentBrilliant
Size (mm)111−21
Individual morphologybacillusbacillus bacillusbacillus
Gram’s reactionNegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
This is the first study of the activity of VOCsB in members of Melolonthidae from Mexico in terms of the isolation of bacteria from the genital chamber, identification of VOCsB emitted from it, and the confirmation of biological activity. The isolation and identification of microorganisms in these species of Cyclocephala are the first recorded for this genus and the third report for Melolonthidae [16,17]; thus, this work provides more information on the diversity of microorganisms associated with the reproductive system of these beetles. The bacterial diversity of the genital chamber of C. lunulata and C. barrerai are like each other and to that reported in other insect species [29,34,42]. The hypothesis is that bacteria can be acquired through food mainly during the larval state, and upon reaching the genital epithelium, they adapt, as that provides them with the conditions for their survival [34,36]. The host does not depend on a sole bacterial species for chemical communication, and thus, in case of losing a member of the bacterial community, the host can replace it [35]. Concerning the VOCsB produced by the genus Klebsiella colonies, the emission of indole is characteristic [43,44]. The genome of K. oxytoca suggests that this microorganism may emit short-chain alcohols [45]; the emission of 3-methyl butane-1-ol in K. oxytoca is the first report with an amino acid-rich culture medium [24].

2.2. Identification of VOCsB

VOCsB recovered by SHS-SPME (Table 3), the total ion chromatogram representative of the four bacteria, are shown in Figure 1; the peaks are numbered relative to those indicated in Table 3. For both Klebsiella sp. and M. morganii bacterial strains isolated from C. lunulata, they were comprised of similar VOCsB derived from sulfur and large-chain alcohols, in addition to aromatic alcohols and indole, with the only difference that Klebsiella sp. emitted 2-tridecanone and M. morganii emitted 1-undecanol. For the bacterial strains isolated from C. barrerai, short-chain alcohol, aromatic alcohol, indole, and two fatty acid esters were recorded in K. oxytoca; this was the species that emitted the least number of VOCsB, in contrast to Ci. Freundii, where thirteen compounds were identified —three derived from sulfur, two large-chain alcohols, two aromatic alcohols, a carboxylic acid, and three fatty acid esters. Aromatic and sulfur-derived alcohols were identified in the compounds captured by DHS-SPE from C. lunulata, Klebsiella sp., and C. barrerai; however, the K. oxytoca strain was distinct, since only 2-phenyl ethanol was identified.
Table 3

VOCsB from the Klebsiella sp. captured by SHS-SPME and DHS-SPE.

Specie BacteriaPk No.Extraction TechniqueVOCsBKRI Ref. KRI Characteristic EI ions
Klebsiella sp.1SHS-SPME(methyl disulfanyl) methane691735 [46]45, 61, 69, 79,83, 91, 94 (M+)
2SHS-SPME(methyl trisulfanyl) methane966961 [46]64, 79, 83, 111, 113, 126 (M+)
3SHS-SPMEphenol977980 [47]40, 55, 66, 74, 94 (M+)
4SHS-SPME2-phenylethanol10871078 [48]51, 65, 77, 91, 92, 122 (M+)
5SHS-SPMEdecan-1-ol12341256 [49]43, 70, 83, 97, 112, 140, 158 (M+)
6SHS-SPMEindole12511288 [50]40, 58, 63, 74, 90, 102, 117 (M+)
7SHS-SPMEtridecan-2-one14751474 [51]43, 58, 71, 85, 96, 140, 198 (M+)
Morganella morganii 1SHS-SPME(methyl disulfanyl) methane691735 [46]45, 61, 69, 79,83, 91, 94 (M+)
2SHS-SPME/DHS-SPE(methyl trisulfanyl) methane966961 [46]64, 79, 83, 111, 113, 126 (M+)
3SHS-SPME/DHS-SPEphenol977980 [47]40, 55, 66, 74, 94 (M+)
4SHS-SPME/DHS-SPE2-phenylethanol10871078 [48]51, 65, 77, 91, 92, 122 (M+)
5SHS-SPMEdecan-1-ol12341256 [49]43, 70, 83, 97, 112, 140, 158 (M+)
6SHS-SPMEindole12511288 [50]40, 58, 63, 74, 90, 102, 117 (M+)
7SHS-SPMEundecan-1-ol12821372 [51]55, 69, 83, 97, 111, 154, 172 (M+)
Klebsiella oxytoca 1SHS-SPME3-methylbutan-1-ol688734 [50]42, 55, 57, 70, 87, 88 (M+)
2SHS-SPME/DHS-SPE2-phenylethanol10871078 [48]51, 65, 77, 91, 92, 122 (M+)
3SHS-SPMEethyl octanoate11791192 [52]57, 88, 127, 172 (M+)
4SHS-SPMEdecan-1-ol12341256 [49]43, 70, 83, 97, 112, 140, 158 (M+)
5SHS-SPMEindole12511288 [50]40, 58, 63, 74, 90, 102, 117 (M+),
6SHS-SPMEdodecan-1-ol14611473 [53]69,83, 97,111, 140, 168, 186 (M+)
7SHS-SPMEtridecan-2-one14751474 [51]58, 71, 140, 169, 183, 198 (M+)
Citrobacter freundii 1SHS-SPME(methyldisulfanyl) methane691735 [46]45, 61, 69, 79,83, 91, 94 (M+)
2SHS-SPME/DHS-SPE(methyltrisulfanyl) methane966961 [46]64, 79, 83, 111, 113, 126 (M+)
3SHS-SPME/DHS-SPEphenol977980 [47]40, 55, 66, 74, 94 (M+)
4SHS-SPME/DHS-SPE2-phenylethanol10871078 [48]51, 65, 77, 91, 92, 122 (M+)
5SHS-SPMEethyl octanoate11791192 [52]57, 88, 127, 143, 157, 172 (M+)
6SHS-SPME/DHS-SPE(methyltetrasulfanyl) methane12041210 [54]45, 64, 79, 94, 111, 145, 158 (M+)
7SHS-SPMEdecan-1-ol12341256 [49]43, 70, 83, 97, 112, 140, 158 (M+)
8SHS-SPMEundecan-1-ol12821372 [51]55, 69, 83, 97, 111, 154, 172 (M+)

Pk No (peak number), headspace-solid phase microextraction (SHS-SPME), dynamic headspace Super Q solid-phase extraction (DHS-SPE), volatile organic compounds from bacteria (VOCsB), and Kovats Retention Index (KRI), Electron Ionization (EI).

Figure 1

Representative total ion chromatogram and chemical structure of the volatile organic compounds from bacteria (VOCsB) from bacteria isolated in the genital chamber of Cyclocephala lunulata (a,b) and Cyclocephala barrerai (c,d). Red color: peak number and blue: retention time (minutes). (Methyl disulfanyl) methane (mdm), (methyl trisulfanyl) methane (mtm), phenol (p), 2-phenylethanol (pe), decan-1-ol (do), indole (i), tridecan-2-one (to), undecan-1-ol (vdo), 3-methylbutan-1-ol (mo), dodecan-1-ol (dod), and (methyltetrasulfanyl) methane (mts).

The genome of K. oxytoca suggests that this microorganism may emit short-chain alcohols [45]. The emission of aromatic alcohols is common in bacteria of the family Enterobacteriaceae [18] to which Cyclocephala bacteria belong, as well as the bacteria isolated from other Melolonthidae previously studied [16,17]. The emission of 3-methyl butane-1-ol in K. oxytoca is the first report with an amino acid-rich culture medium [24]. These aromatic alcohols, in general, are very attractive to insects in behavioral bioassays [42,55]. There is a relationship between the species that can metabolize compounds derived from sulfur and phenol; VOCsB that contain sulfur are related to the bacterial metabolism of phenol [21], such as in the case of K. oxytoca that did not produce phenol nor sulfur derivatives. The production of phenol is related to the attraction of conspecifics to the insects harboring the emitting bacteria; this compound is present in the pheromones of several Melolonthidae [10,41,56,57,58], including Cyclocephala sp. [59]

2.3. Insect Attraction to VOCsB

In C. lunulata (Figure 2a), 90% of males and 73.6% of females selected the VOCsB emitted by M. morganii rather than those from the control; both results were statistically significant: χ2 = 6.40, p = 0.01, degrees of freedom (df) = 9, n = 10, and χ2 = 4.36, p = 0.03, df = 18, n = 19, respectively. This demonstrates that the VOCsB from M. morganii attract both sexes. The results regarding attraction to the VOCsB obtained from Klebsiella sp. were inconclusive, and therefore, studies are still in progress. In C. barrerai (Figure 2b), 77.7% of males significantly preferred the compounds emitted by Ci. freundii rather than those of the control (χ2 = 5.56, p = 0.01, df = 17, n = 18). In regard to the VOCsB emitted by K. oxytoca, 61% of male individuals preferred these over the control; however, this result was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.89, p = 0.34, df = 17, n = 18). There were no attraction tests for females of this species due to the low number of female insects captured.
Figure 2

Attraction of Cyclocephala lunulata and Cyclocephala barrerai towards VOCsB from the bacteria resident of the genital chamber of females. Asterisks indicate significant differences in χ2 test and p > 0.05. (a) Males (n = 10) and females (n = 19) of C. lunulata attracted to VOCsB from Morganella morganii; (b) Males of C. barrerai (n = 18) attracted to VOCsB from Klebsiella oxytoca and Citrobacter freundii.

In tests on the attraction of C. lunulata to bacteria from C. barrerai (Figure 3), 77.7% of males selected the VOCsB emitted by Ci. freundii rather than those from the control (χ2 = 5.56, p = 0.01, df = 17, n = 18), 61% of males selected the VOCsB emitted by K. oxytoca rather than those from the control (χ2 = 0.89, p = 0.34, df = 17, n = 18). For the females of C. lunulata, 77.7% selected the VOCsB emitted by Ci. freundii rather than those from the control (χ2 = 5.56, p = 0.01, df = 17, n = 18), and 73% of females selected the VOCsB emitted by K. oxytoca; however, this result was not statistically significant (χ2 = 3.56, p = 0.59, df = 17, n = 18).
Figure 3

Attraction of females (n = 18) and males (n = 18) of Cyclocephala lunulata towards the VOCsB of the bacteria resident of the genital chamber of females of Cyclocephala barrerai. The asterisk indicates significant differences in χ2 test, and p > 0.05).

Although is not possible the compounds are part of the pheromones, our results confirm that VOCsB act as attractants [7], because adults of C. lunulata responded to VOCsB obtained from the bacteria isolated from C. barrerai; in particular, to those that had 2-phenyl ethanol, phenol, and sulfur derivatives. In this work, it was observed that C. lunulata and C. barrerai display attraction behaviors to VOCsB in the bioassays, walking against the wind towards the source of emission [60,61].

2.4. Test of EAG

In the EAG bioassays, the antennae of female individuals of C. lunulata to the VOCsB of M. morganii (Figure 4) presented a statistically significant greater response to VOCsB than to the control (t = 2.80, n = 11, p = 0.01).
Figure 4

Antennal depolarization of Cyclocephala lunulata at VOCsB of Morganella morganii. The asterisk indicates significant differences in the paired t-test (n = 11, p > 0.05).

From the antennal response to VOCsB of Ci. freundii and K. oxytoca (Figure 5), the antennae of male C. barrerai presented a statistically significant greater response to VOCsB than to the control (F = 7.19, df = 9, p < 0.01). In C. lunulata, the females presented a statistically significant greater response to VOCsB than to the control (F = 5.272, df = 11, p = 0.01) and males (F = 4.022, df = 10, p = 0.03).
Figure 5

Antennal depolarization of Cyclocephala barrerai and Cyclocephala lunulata at VOCsB of Citrobacter freundii and Klebsiella oxytoca. Different letters indicate statistically different values by ANOVA Repeat Measures (RM) (Fisher Least significant difference (LSD), n = 12, p > 0.05).

In view of the above, the EAG tests revealed that those compounds produced antennal responses where phenol showed the greatest effects. EAG tests are important to ensure that the insect recognizes the substance to which it is exposed [62]. The attraction of beetles to VOCsB has been widely studied; however, the study of the antennal response has not, whereas EAG studies have been carried out for pheromones, allowing to relate attraction and recognition in the insect [7]. In this study, it was observed that VOCsB caused antennal depolarization, particularly those containing aromatic alcohols, such as phenol and 2-phenylethanol. The attraction of both male and female individuals of C. lunulata towards several of the VOCsB indicates that these are aggregation attractants [62,63]. Aggregation has been cited for species from Dynastinae; although the production of these chemical substances has been primarily associated with males [37,39,64,65,66,67,68,69], there are reports of female beetles emitting this type of pheromone as well [70,71]. In this study, the females of Cyclocephala produced the compounds, possibly with the assistance of bacteria associated with their genital chamber, and this coincides with other studies reporting that VOCsB act as aggregation attractants for their insect hosts [35,36]. In other studies, the VOCsB of Bactrocera zonata Saunders attract a greater number of females [18], and the VOCsB from the intestinal microbiota of Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins provoke aggregation for the mass invasion of trees [72]. The emission of alcohols by bacteria from the genital chamber of C. lunulata could also serve a defensive role against pathogenic microorganisms, in addition to their function in insect chemical communication. Alcohol derivatives such as phenol and, particularly, long-chain alcohols are usually produced by members of Enterobacteriaceae [25], and they inhibit the growth and development of Gram-positive bacteria, fungi [2,73], and the most representative species of insect pathogens [74]. This could explain why, until now, all bacteria isolated from the female reproductive apparatus of Melolonthidae beetles belonged to Enterobacteriaceae. For instance, the intestinal bacteria of Schistocerca gregaria [35] act primarily as a form of defense and participate in the synthesis of food and secondarily function in the chemical communication of the host. Therefore, bacteria from different species are metabolically similar and emit similar compounds [18].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Insects

The collection of adult specimens was conducted during the periods April-June 2017, April-June 2018, and March-July 2019. The C. lunulata adults were collected in green spaces within the municipalities of Yautepec (18°53′10.5″ N 99°04′17.9″ W and Cuautla, Morelos (18°49′51.5″ N 98°56′40.1″ W), Mexico between 23:00 and 24:00 h, and the adults of C. barrerai were collected in the green spaces of the ″Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla″ (BUAP) (19°00′17.1″ N 98°12′08.5″ W) and in “La Presa” Park (18°58’26.0″ N, 98°14’46.4″ W), Puebla, Mexico between 20:00 and 21:00 h. Insects were identified using the keys created by Morón [75]. Each species was separated according to sex, and groups of ten individuals were placed in 1-L bottles with 50% soil and organic material; every third day, the beetles were fed on Psidium sp. fruit, and the soil was moistened with water. The beetles were left for at least five days without copulation for the subsequent experiments.

3.2. Microorganisms of the Female Reproductive System

Based on the technique proposed by Rosete-Enríquez and Romero-López [17], bacteria were extracted from the genital chamber of 10 females of C. lunulata and C. barrerai. The colony-forming units of each bacterial strain were cultivated to describe their colonial morphology and identifying bacterial morphology using Gram staining. Genomic DNA was extracted and purified according to the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The amplification of two segments of the 16S rRNA gene was performed by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based on the protocol proposed by Rosete-Enríquez and Romero-López [17]. Briefly, two reactions carried out using 10 ng of genomic DNA, 200-μM deoxynucleotide solution mix (dNTPs), 1 μM of each pair of upper and lower primers, 2 or 1.5-mM MgCl2, 1.25 units of PlatimunTM Taq DNA polymerase, 1X PCR buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and DNase free water to make 20 μL. The sequence of primers for the first reaction was 8F 5′ AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG 3′ and 907R 5′ CCGTCAATTCM TTTRAGTTT 3′. The second reaction was conducted with primers 533F 5′ GTGCCAGCAGCCGCGGTAA 3′ and 1496R 5′ GGTTAC.CTTGTTACGACTT 3′. Amplifications were performed in a Techne 412 thermocycler (Bibby Scientific, Staffordshire, UK) with the following cycling program: initial denaturation for 5 min at 94 °C, 35 or 30 cycles for 45 s at 94 °C, 55°C or 56 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1.5 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The molecular weight of the amplicons was determined by comparison with the migration of the 100-bp molecular marker. The PCR amplicons were purified from band cutting following the instructions of the QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen). Once the amplicon concentration was verified, sequencing was performed using the Sanger method in the sequencing unit of the Institute of Biology of BUAP, Mexico. The sequences were edited and assembled with the free distribution software Bioedit 7.0 [76]. Genus and species identification were carried out using BLAST in the database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi), comparing the sequence obtained from the rRNA 16s gene with reference sequences recorded in the database. The analysis of the sequences was performed by CLUSTALW method [77] alignment, followed by a calculation of genetic pairwise distances using the neighbor-joining method [78]. Estimation of variance was performed by Bootstrap with 10,000 resamples, with a model of nucleotide substitution using the Kimura 2 parameters analysis [79] and gamma distribution pattern. The matrix of the genetic distances was completed using the freely distributed software MEGA 7 (1.0 version, State College, PA, USA) [80].

3.3. Extraction and Identification of VOCsB

The bacterial strains were cultivated in round, glass flasks containing 50 mL of triple-sugar iron (TSI) sterile culture. The bottles were pressure-sealed using an aluminum top with a silicon septa in its center. The system was incubated 8 h at 30 °C: VOCsB were captured by SHS-SPME, inserting a 65-μM PDMS/DVB fiber (Supelco, Inc., Bellefonte, PA, USA) into the bottle and maintaining the system for 16 h at 30 °C. After removing the fiber, the sample was analyzed by GC-MS. Ten repetitions were carried out for each bacterial strain in TSI; the control was a sterile TSI medium without bacteria. The capture of VOCsB by DHS-SPE was performed under the aforementioned conditions for bacterial growth in the TSI medium; cultures were incubated for a period of 8 h at 30 °C. Pasteur pipette with 125 mg of Super Q 80/100 (Alltech Assoc, Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA) was connected to the upper part of the flask through the silicone septa. Once the Pasteur pipette was inserted, the experiment was maintained for 16 h at 30 °C. The end of the incubation period, the culture system was removed, and the end of the Pasteur pipette was connected to a Welch USA double-flow pump with a constant suction flow of 500 mL/min for 1 h at 27 °C. The compounds were diluted in 2 mL of hexane (HPLC, JT Barker®, Chemical company, NJ, USA) and reconcentrated to 200 μL with a nitrogen current. An GC-MS (7890A-5975C, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), with an HP-5MS column (19091S-433, Agilent, Santa Clara, NJ, USA) (30 m, 0.250-μm internal diameter, and 0.25-μm thickness) was used for the identification of the VOCsB captured by both extraction methods. Aliquots (2 μL) of the extracts were analyzed by GC-MS; oven start temperature of 50 °C for 2 min, increased to 220 °C by 8 °C/min, and maintained for 2 min; the injection port functioned in the splitless 1:10 mode at a temperature of 250 °C [24]; the flow was 2 mL/min of hydrogen as a carrier gas. The mass spectrometer worked with electronic ionization (70 EV) in SCAN mode and a mass range of 35 to 550 Atomic Mass Unit AMU. Only the compounds that were present in at least 90% of the test samples and absent in the control were identified by their retention times, Kovats Retention Index [81], and through comparison of their mass spectra with the spectral library NIST/EPA/NIH (Software Version 2.0, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). The chemical structure is made with the software ADC/ChemSketch Freeware 2020, Canada.

3.4. Bioassays

3.4.1. Olfactometer

A glass Y-tube olfactometer consisting of a central 14-cm-long tube and two 13-cm-long arms with an internal diameter of 1.5 cm was used. Each arm was connected to a 6.5-cm-long and 2.5-cm-internal diameter glass chamber, where the stimulants were placed. For the stimulus impulse, a wind flow of 500 mL/min provided by a double-flow pump (2522B-01, WELCH, Niles, IL, USA) was used, regulated by a flowmeter (Cole-Palmer, Chicago, IL, USA), at 1 L/min in the central tube. The bioassays were conducted between 20:30 h–21:30 h for C. barrerai and 23:00 h–1:00 h for C. lunulata under controlled conditions of 27 ± 1°C, 50% relative humidity, and illuminated by a 15-W red light (Philips, Shenzhen, China). The bacterial extracts were used as stimuli and the sterile medium as the control. To the stimuli, 2 μL were added on a piece of 5 × 2-mm filter paper (Whatman No. 1® 2V, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), which were placed inside each end of the olfactometer and left for 20 s to allow the volatilization of the stimulus. The test was conducted with female and male beetles that did not copulate during the previous 5-7 days. The behavior of the adults was filmed using a camera (WB800F, Samsung, Daegu, South Korea), and the response of everyone to each stimulus was recorded. A positive response was considered as an individual reaching at least halfway along the glass arm and remaining at the side that was selected for over 30 s [60]. There was a pause of 5 min between each test during which a flow of air cleaned the system to ensure any volatile remnants were removed. The arm where the stimuli were placed was alternated randomly, and only one sex was analyzed per day. Before each bioassay, the olfactometers were washed and rinsed with hexane and dried at 100 °C. The data were analyzed using a χ2 test and presented as the total percentage of repetitions. The video recordings were revised, and photos were obtained that were used to chart the behavior patterns presented by the individual beetles before, and then, they selected a stimulus.

3.4.2. Electroantennography

EAG responses were conducted using EAG equipment (Syntech, Kirchzarten, Germany). A recently dissected antenna of each adult was mounted between 2 silver electrodes using conductor gel (Sigma gel, SYNTECH, Spectra 360, Parker, Orange, NJ, USA). The signal generated by the antenna was transmitted to an IDAC-2 amplifier, recorded, and analyzed with software (SYNTECH EAG PRO 2.0, 2005, SYNTECH, Hilversum, The Netherlands). A constant flow of humidified pure air (0.5 L/min) provided by a pump (stimulus controller SC-55) was directed onto the antenna through a glass tube (diameter 10 mm). To present a stimulus, a pipette tip containing the stimulus of 2 μL of VOCsB extract headspace was placed on filter paper (5 × 2 mm, Whatman No. 1) was inserted through a side hole located at the midpoint of the glass tube. The outlet of the glass tube was positioned approximately 2 cm from the antenna. Humidified pure air flowed at 0.5 L/min through the pipette during stimulation. For stimulus application, 2 μL of stimuli were placed on filter paper (5 × 2 mm, Whatman No. 1). A dilution of standard eucalyptol (50 μL/mL) was used as an entrance and exit stimulus for C. lunulata and linalool (50 μL/mL) for C. barrerai to verify the basal state of the antenna. All the standards were provided by Sigma Aldrich® (Toluca, Mexico). The stimuli were the VOCsB extracts and the control (extract of TSI); they were randomly placed in the arms of the olfactometer. In each experiment, the solvent was left to evaporate for 20 s, and the time interval between each stimulus was 60 s. In these bioassays, the antennal depolarization response to the solvent was subtracted from the response to the stimuli before analysis. Once obtained, the antennal responses were analyzed with the software; the data were normalized, calculating the EAG values as a relative percentage to the entrance and exit stimuli to eliminate the error caused by a loss of sensibility in the antenna.

3.5. Statistical Analysis

Olfactometry bioassays behavior was analyzed using χ2. EAG data were log-transformed and analyzed by a paired t-test and ANOVA Repeat Measures (RM), SigmaPlot 12.0, SYSTAT Software, Chicago, IL, USA.

4. Conclusions

Female C. lunulata and C. barrerai possess bacteria in their genital chamber, C. lunulata possesses the bacteria M. morganii and Klebsiella sp., and female C. barrerai possess the bacteria K. oxytoca and Ci. freundii. Klebsiella sp. and M. morganii emit VOCsB derived from sulfur; alcohols; and aromatic alcohols such as methyltrisulfanyl methane, decan-1-ol, and phenol. VOCsB of M. morganii cause attraction responses and antenatal responses in females and males of C. lunulata, functioning as aggregation attractants. Klebsiella oxytoca emits VOCsB such as aromatic compounds and aliphatic and aromatic alcohols, including decan-1-ol and 2-phenyletanol. In the bioassays, no significant differences were observed in the attraction responses of males of C. barrerai and males and females of C. lunulata to K. oxytoca VOCsB, although these compounds caused an antennal response in these beetles. Finally, Ci. freundii emitted a large number of sulfur-derived compounds; alcohols; and aromatic alcohols such as (methyldisulfanyl) methane, (methyltrisulfanyl) methane decan-1-ol, and phenol. These VOCsB cause the attraction of male C. barrerai and male and female C. lunulata, functioning as aggregation attractants. As VOCsB function as aggregation attractants, they could be used in mass trapping for the management of C. lunulata. This study is novel in terms of the identification of VOCsB and their biological activity in their hosts.
  49 in total

1.  A note: gut bacteria produce components of a locust cohesion pheromone.

Authors:  R J Dillon; C T Vennard; A K Charnley
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 2.  Pheromone production in bark beetles.

Authors:  Gary J Blomquist; Rubi Figueroa-Teran; Mory Aw; Minmin Song; Andrew Gorzalski; Nicole L Abbott; Eric Chang; Claus Tittiger
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.714

Review 3.  Bacterial volatiles: the smell of small organisms.

Authors:  Stefan Schulz; Jeroen S Dickschat
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 13.423

4.  Production of the long-chain alcohols octanol, decanol, and dodecanol by Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Thomas Hamilton-Kemp; Melissa Newman; Randall Collins; Hesham Elgaali; Keshun Yu; Douglas Archbold
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2005-06-27       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Volatiles production and attractiveness to the Mexican fruit fly of Enterobacter agglomerans isolated from apple maggot and Mexican fruit flies.

Authors:  David C Robacker; Carol R Lauzon; Xiaodun He
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Plant Volatiles Increase Sex Pheromone Attraction of Holotrichia parallela (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea).

Authors:  Qian Ju; Xiao-Qiang Guo; Xiao Li; Xiao-Jing Jiang; Xiang-Guo Jiang; Wan-Li Ni; Ming-Jing Qu
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Effect of glucose concentration in the growth medium upon neutral and acidic fermentation end-products of Clostridium bifermentans, Clostridium sporogenes and peptostreptococcus anaerobius.

Authors:  L J Turton; D B Drucker; L A Ganguli
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 9.  Insect Pathogenic Bacteria in Integrated Pest Management.

Authors:  Luca Ruiu
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.769

10.  Colonization of weakened trees by mass-attacking bark beetles: no penalty for pioneers, scattered initial distributions and final regular patterns.

Authors:  Etienne Toffin; Edith Gabriel; Marceau Louis; Jean-Louis Deneubourg; Jean-Claude Grégoire
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reproductive Apparatus, Gonadic Maturation, and Allometry of Cyclocephala barrerai Martínez (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae: Dynastinae).

Authors:  Abraham Sanchez-Cruz; Daniel Tapia-Maruri; Alfredo Jiménez-Pérez
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 3.139

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.