Ayhan Askin1, Lker Sengul2, Aliye Tosun2. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Katip Çelebi University, Izmir, Turkey. Electronic address: ayhan.askin@ikcu.edu.tr. 2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Katip Çelebi University, Izmir, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Studies using YouTube data for various diseases are rapidly increasing. This study aimed to investigate the educational quality, reliability and accuracy of the YouTube videos concerning repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applications in patients with stroke. METHODS: This is a descriptive study. A video based search on YouTube was performed on April 18th, 2020 by using keyword 'stroke repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation'. The videos were queried using the default settings on YouTube and the results were listed according to relevance. Video parameters and sources were recorded. Quality, reliability and accuracy of the videos were determined with Global Quality Score (GQS), Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria and Modified DISCERN Questionnaire, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 21 videos were included in the study. The median number of views for videos was 884 (range: 89-28589) and the median duration was 135 seconds. None of the videos had a negative interaction index. The median value was found to be 3 for all three measurements (GQS, JAMA, and DISCERN). Most of the videos were of intermediate quality (47.6%) and had partial sufficient data (61.9%). In the high-quality group, the number of views, dislikes, the duration of the videos, JAMA and DISCERN scores were higher than the low-quality group (p < 0.05). At the same time, viewing rates of the high-quality group were better than the low and the intermediate-quality group (p < 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between GQS and number of the views, video duration, number of likes, number of dislikes, viewing rate and modified DISCERN questionnaire scores (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that most of the rated videos were of intermediate quality and had partially sufficient data. It has also been found that high-quality videos have higher viewing rates, more dislikes, longer video durations as well as better reliability and accuracy scores. YouTube videos of higher quality and accuracy are needed to increase awareness of rTMS by stroke patients.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Studies using YouTube data for various diseases are rapidly increasing. This study aimed to investigate the educational quality, reliability and accuracy of the YouTube videos concerning repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applications in patients with stroke. METHODS: This is a descriptive study. A video based search on YouTube was performed on April 18th, 2020 by using keyword 'stroke repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation'. The videos were queried using the default settings on YouTube and the results were listed according to relevance. Video parameters and sources were recorded. Quality, reliability and accuracy of the videos were determined with Global Quality Score (GQS), Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria and Modified DISCERN Questionnaire, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 21 videos were included in the study. The median number of views for videos was 884 (range: 89-28589) and the median duration was 135 seconds. None of the videos had a negative interaction index. The median value was found to be 3 for all three measurements (GQS, JAMA, and DISCERN). Most of the videos were of intermediate quality (47.6%) and had partial sufficient data (61.9%). In the high-quality group, the number of views, dislikes, the duration of the videos, JAMA and DISCERN scores were higher than the low-quality group (p < 0.05). At the same time, viewing rates of the high-quality group were better than the low and the intermediate-quality group (p < 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between GQS and number of the views, video duration, number of likes, number of dislikes, viewing rate and modified DISCERN questionnaire scores (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that most of the rated videos were of intermediate quality and had partially sufficient data. It has also been found that high-quality videos have higher viewing rates, more dislikes, longer video durations as well as better reliability and accuracy scores. YouTube videos of higher quality and accuracy are needed to increase awareness of rTMS by strokepatients.