Literature DB >> 32991199

Impact of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Sharing on Quality of Life and Health Outcomes in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

William H Polonsky1,2, Addie L Fortmann3.   

Abstract

Background: To examine experiences with real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) data sharing and its impact on health-related outcomes.
Methods: Adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) (N = 302) using the Dexcom G5 Mobile or G6 RT-CGM system and sharing data with ≥1 family/friend follower completed a survey exploring their perceived value of data sharing, the impact of sharing on health and quality of life (QoL) outcomes, and how their chief follower (CF) used shared data to support their diabetes management. Regression analyses examined whether CF actions were linked to reported changes in health and QoL outcomes for the T1D adult.
Results: The majority had lived with T1D >10 years, (76.5%), used RT-CGM >1 year (58.0%), and identified their spouse/partner as CF (51.9%). Data sharing reportedly contributed to improved hypoglycemic confidence (for 89.4% of respondents), improved overall well-being (54.3%), and reduced diabetes distress (36.1%). Benefits related to data sharing included fewer episodes of severe hypoglycemia (62.2%), better sleep (52.4%), and A1C improvement (47.3%). In particular, three positive CF actions were independent predictors of health and QoL benefits: celebrating success related to glycemic control, providing encouragement when glycemic control is challenging, and teamwork discussions about how CF should respond to out-of-range values. Conclusions: RT-CGM data sharing was associated with a range of health and QoL-related benefits. The occurrence of benefits was influenced by the collaborative management approaches taken by RT-CGM users and their data-sharing followers. Longitudinal trials are needed to determine the most effective patterns of collaborative data sharing, leading to their implementation into routine diabetes management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous glucose monitoring; Data sharing; Quality of life; Type 1 diabetes

Year:  2020        PMID: 32991199      PMCID: PMC7906862          DOI: 10.1089/dia.2020.0466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  6 in total

Review 1.  Barriers and Facilitators to Diabetes Device Adoption for People with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Molly L Tanenbaum; Persis V Commissariat
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 5.430

2.  Clinical Application of Time in Range and Other Metrics.

Authors:  Grazia Aleppo
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2021-05-25

3.  Impact of Real-Time CGM Data Sharing on Quality of Life in the Caregivers of Adults and Children With Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Addie L Fortmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-12-16

4.  Solutions to Address Inequity in Diabetes Technology Use in Type 1 Diabetes: Results from Multidisciplinary Stakeholder Co-creation Workshops.

Authors:  Shivani Agarwal; Gladys Crespo-Ramos; Stephanie L Leung; Molly Finnan; Tina Park; Katie McCurdy; Jeffrey S Gonzalez; Judith A Long
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 7.337

5.  Practical aspects of diabetes technology use: Continuous glucose monitors, insulin pumps, and automated insulin delivery systems.

Authors:  Brynn E Marks; Kristen M Williams; Jordan S Sherwood; Melissa S Putman
Journal:  J Clin Transl Endocrinol       Date:  2021-12-04

6.  Lived Experience of Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Versus Hybrid Closed-Loop: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Perspectives.

Authors:  Korey K Hood; Lori M Laffel; Thomas Danne; Revital Nimri; Stuart A Weinzimer; Judy Sibayan; Ryan J Bailey; Desmond Schatz; Natasa Bratina; Rachel Bello; Alina Punel; Peter Calhoun; Roy W Beck; Richard M Bergenstal; Moshe Phillip
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 6.118

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.