Nicole A Coull1,2, Anna M West1, Simon G Hodder1, Patrick Wheeler3, George Havenith4. 1. Environmental Ergonomics Research Centre, Loughborough School of Design and Creative Arts, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK. 2. Diabetes Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK. 3. School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK. 4. Environmental Ergonomics Research Centre, Loughborough School of Design and Creative Arts, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK. G.Havenith@lboro.ac.uk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Given the pressing impact of global warming and its detrimental effect on the health of older populations, understanding age-related changes in thermoregulatory function is essential. Age differences in regional sweat distribution have been observed previously, but given the typically small measurement areas assessed, the development of whole body sweat maps for older individuals is required. Therefore, this study investigated age-related differences in regional sweat distribution in a hot environment (32 °C/50%RH) in young and older adults, using a body mapping approach. METHODS: Technical absorbent pads were applied to the skin of 14 young (age 24 ± 2 years) and 14 older (68 ± 5 years) males to measure regional sweat rate (RSR) at rest (30 min) and during exercise (30 min), at a fixed heat production (200 W m-2). Gastrointestinal (Tgi) and skin temperature (Tsk), heart rate, thermal sensation, and thermal comfort were also measured. RESULTS: Whole body sweat maps showed that despite equal heat production, healthy older males had significantly lower gross sweat loss (GSL) than the young and significantly lower RSR at almost all body regions at rest and at the hands, legs, ankles, and feet during exercise. The lower sweat loss in the older group coincided with a greater increase in Tgi and a consistently higher Tsk at the legs, despite subjectively feeling slightly cooler than younger individuals. CONCLUSION: These findings support the evidence of age-related deterioration in both autonomic and subjective responses in the heat and highlight the lower extremities as the most affected body region.
PURPOSE: Given the pressing impact of global warming and its detrimental effect on the health of older populations, understanding age-related changes in thermoregulatory function is essential. Age differences in regional sweat distribution have been observed previously, but given the typically small measurement areas assessed, the development of whole body sweat maps for older individuals is required. Therefore, this study investigated age-related differences in regional sweat distribution in a hot environment (32 °C/50%RH) in young and older adults, using a body mapping approach. METHODS: Technical absorbent pads were applied to the skin of 14 young (age 24 ± 2 years) and 14 older (68 ± 5 years) males to measure regional sweat rate (RSR) at rest (30 min) and during exercise (30 min), at a fixed heat production (200 W m-2). Gastrointestinal (Tgi) and skin temperature (Tsk), heart rate, thermal sensation, and thermal comfort were also measured. RESULTS: Whole body sweat maps showed that despite equal heat production, healthy older males had significantly lower gross sweat loss (GSL) than the young and significantly lower RSR at almost all body regions at rest and at the hands, legs, ankles, and feet during exercise. The lower sweat loss in the older group coincided with a greater increase in Tgi and a consistently higher Tsk at the legs, despite subjectively feeling slightly cooler than younger individuals. CONCLUSION: These findings support the evidence of age-related deterioration in both autonomic and subjective responses in the heat and highlight the lower extremities as the most affected body region.
Entities:
Keywords:
Ageing; Body mapping; Exercise; Heat; Skin temperature; Sweating
Authors: D J Casa; L E Armstrong; S K Hillman; S J Montain; R V Reiff; B S Rich; W O Roberts; J A Stone Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: W Larry Kenney; S Tony Wolf; Gabrielle A Dillon; Craig W Berry; Lacy M Alexander Journal: J Sci Med Sport Date: 2020-12-25 Impact factor: 4.597
Authors: Josh Foster; James W Smallcombe; Simon Hodder; Ollie Jay; Andreas D Flouris; George Havenith Journal: Int J Biometeorol Date: 2021-11-06 Impact factor: 3.787