Jonas R Te Paske1, Sarah DeWitt1,2, Robin Hicks1,3, Shana Semmens1,4, Leigh Vaughan1. 1. 2345Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. 2. 246010Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA. 3. 3740UPMC Pinnacle Health, Harrisburg, PA, USA. 4. Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening (P-CaRES) tool has been validated to identify patients in the emergency department (ED) with unmet palliative care needs, but no prognostic data have been published. The Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) has been validated to predict survival based on performance status and separately has been shown to predict survival among adults admitted to the hospital from the ED. OBJECTIVE: To concurrently validate the 6-month prognostic utility of P-CaRES with a replication of prior studies that demonstrated the prognostic utility of the PPS among adults admitted to the hospital from the ED. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING/ SUBJECTS: Adults >55 years admitted to the hospital from the ED at an urban academic hospital in South Carolina. MEASUREMENT: Baseline PPS score and P-CaRES status were evaluated within 51 hours of admission. Vital status at 6 months was evaluated by phone or chart review. RESULTS: 131 of 145 participants completed the study. Six-month survival was 79.2% of those with a PPS of 60-100 (22/106 died) and 48% of those with a PPS of 10-50 (13/25 died) (p = 0.0004). Six-month survival was 85.2% for P-CaRES negative (13/88 died) and 48.8% for P-CaRES positive (22/43 died) (p < 0.0001). The inferred hazard ratio (HR) for PPS 10-50, as compared to PPS 60-100 was 3.003 (95%CI (1.475, 6.112) p = 0.0024) and the HR for P-CaRES positive, as compared to P-CaRES negative was 4.186 (95%CI (2.052, 8.536) p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The P-CaRES tool and PPS can predict 6-month survival of older adults admitted from the ED.
BACKGROUND: The Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening (P-CaRES) tool has been validated to identify patients in the emergency department (ED) with unmet palliative care needs, but no prognostic data have been published. The Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) has been validated to predict survival based on performance status and separately has been shown to predict survival among adults admitted to the hospital from the ED. OBJECTIVE: To concurrently validate the 6-month prognostic utility of P-CaRES with a replication of prior studies that demonstrated the prognostic utility of the PPS among adults admitted to the hospital from the ED. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING/ SUBJECTS: Adults >55 years admitted to the hospital from the ED at an urban academic hospital in South Carolina. MEASUREMENT: Baseline PPS score and P-CaRES status were evaluated within 51 hours of admission. Vital status at 6 months was evaluated by phone or chart review. RESULTS: 131 of 145 participants completed the study. Six-month survival was 79.2% of those with a PPS of 60-100 (22/106 died) and 48% of those with a PPS of 10-50 (13/25 died) (p = 0.0004). Six-month survival was 85.2% for P-CaRES negative (13/88 died) and 48.8% for P-CaRES positive (22/43 died) (p < 0.0001). The inferred hazard ratio (HR) for PPS 10-50, as compared to PPS 60-100 was 3.003 (95%CI (1.475, 6.112) p = 0.0024) and the HR for P-CaRES positive, as compared to P-CaRES negative was 4.186 (95%CI (2.052, 8.536) p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The P-CaRES tool and PPS can predict 6-month survival of older adults admitted from the ED.
Entities:
Keywords:
PPS; Palliative Performance Scale; emergency medicine; palliative care; palliative care and rapid emergency screening; prognostication