Leah Morris1, Pam Moule2, Jennifer Pearson1, Dave Foster3, Nicola Walsh1. 1. Centre for Health and Clinical Research, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK. 2. Department of Nursing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK. 3. Patient Research Partner, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of general practitioner (GP) consultations are due to musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs). Physiotherapists are trained to assess, diagnose and treat MSKDs and provide an alternative to GP consultation for primary care patients as first contact physiotherapists (FCPs). AIM: To explore patient perceived acceptability of the FCP role using realist methods to understand what works for whom, how, why and in what circumstances. METHODS: A realist evaluation was undertaken, which involved three stages: forming the theory area framework; testing the theory framework and refining the programme theory. The theory framework was formed through realist synthesis. Realist interviews tested this framework. Data were collected from two GP practice case study sites and interviews were undertaken at each site. N = 20 participants were interviewed in total. In each practice, this constituted patients (n = 5), GPs (n = 1), FCPs (n = 2), receptionists (n = 1) and practice managers (n = 1). Interview data were analysed against preliminary hypotheses and, where appropriate, new theory areas were created. RESULTS: The evaluation highlighted that acceptability of the FCP role was influenced by 'expectations', 'accessibility' and 'promoting the role'. Whilst some findings were shared by both practices, different contexts resulted in unique practice findings. CONCLUSION: Patients were predominantly accepting of FCPs, nevertheless, there was a scope to increase acceptability through an implementation strategy that considered the contexts of the individual patient, as well as wider practice contexts.
BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of general practitioner (GP) consultations are due to musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs). Physiotherapists are trained to assess, diagnose and treat MSKDs and provide an alternative to GP consultation for primary care patients as first contact physiotherapists (FCPs). AIM: To explore patient perceived acceptability of the FCP role using realist methods to understand what works for whom, how, why and in what circumstances. METHODS: A realist evaluation was undertaken, which involved three stages: forming the theory area framework; testing the theory framework and refining the programme theory. The theory framework was formed through realist synthesis. Realist interviews tested this framework. Data were collected from two GP practice case study sites and interviews were undertaken at each site. N = 20 participants were interviewed in total. In each practice, this constituted patients (n = 5), GPs (n = 1), FCPs (n = 2), receptionists (n = 1) and practice managers (n = 1). Interview data were analysed against preliminary hypotheses and, where appropriate, new theory areas were created. RESULTS: The evaluation highlighted that acceptability of the FCP role was influenced by 'expectations', 'accessibility' and 'promoting the role'. Whilst some findings were shared by both practices, different contexts resulted in unique practice findings. CONCLUSION:Patients were predominantly accepting of FCPs, nevertheless, there was a scope to increase acceptability through an implementation strategy that considered the contexts of the individual patient, as well as wider practice contexts.