Chase R Parsons1,2, Jonathan D Hron1,2, Fabienne C Bourgeois1,2. 1. Boston Children's Hospital, Division of General Pediatrics Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates and characterizes the use of a confidential clinic note type as part of the implementation of open notes at a free-standing children's hospital. We describe how this electronic health record feature which disables patient and family access to selected notes in the patient portal is used across our institution, which clinicians are using this feature, and the type of data our clinicians consider confidential. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Through retrospective chart review, we have evaluated the use of a confidential note type over a 1-year period. RESULTS: We identified 402 964 clinic notes created during a 1-year period, of which 9346 (2.3%) were flagged as confidential. Use of this confidential note type was associated with female patient sex and increase in patient age. It was used most frequently by a small subset of providers. 922 (83.8%) of 1100 notes manually reviewed contained sensitive information. Reasons for confidential notes varied, but patient's mental health was most commonly identified. DISCUSSION: Our data demonstrate variability in the use of a confidential note type across specialties, patient ages, and types of confidential information. This note type is frequently utilized by a subset of providers who often manage sensitive patient and parent information. As vendors and institutions enable open notes, thoughtful implementation and provider education surrounding the use of this confidential feature is needed. CONCLUSION: A confidential clinic note feature is an integral aspect of pediatric open notes implementation. This feature supports protection of confidential information pertaining to our patients and their caregivers.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates and characterizes the use of a confidential clinic note type as part of the implementation of open notes at a free-standing children's hospital. We describe how this electronic health record feature which disables patient and family access to selected notes in the patient portal is used across our institution, which clinicians are using this feature, and the type of data our clinicians consider confidential. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Through retrospective chart review, we have evaluated the use of a confidential note type over a 1-year period. RESULTS: We identified 402 964 clinic notes created during a 1-year period, of which 9346 (2.3%) were flagged as confidential. Use of this confidential note type was associated with female patient sex and increase in patient age. It was used most frequently by a small subset of providers. 922 (83.8%) of 1100 notes manually reviewed contained sensitive information. Reasons for confidential notes varied, but patient's mental health was most commonly identified. DISCUSSION: Our data demonstrate variability in the use of a confidential note type across specialties, patient ages, and types of confidential information. This note type is frequently utilized by a subset of providers who often manage sensitive patient and parent information. As vendors and institutions enable open notes, thoughtful implementation and provider education surrounding the use of this confidential feature is needed. CONCLUSION: A confidential clinic note feature is an integral aspect of pediatric open notes implementation. This feature supports protection of confidential information pertaining to our patients and their caregivers.
Authors: Mari M Nakamura; Marvin B Harper; Allan V Castro; Feliciano B Yu; Ashish K Jha Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2015-03-09 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Tom Delbanco; Jan Walker; Sigall K Bell; Jonathan D Darer; Joann G Elmore; Nadine Farag; Henry J Feldman; Roanne Mejilla; Long Ngo; James D Ralston; Stephen E Ross; Neha Trivedi; Elisabeth Vodicka; Suzanne G Leveille Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Sigall K Bell; Roanne Mejilla; Melissa Anselmo; Jonathan D Darer; Joann G Elmore; Suzanne Leveille; Long Ngo; James D Ralston; Tom Delbanco; Jan Walker Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Fabienne C Bourgeois; Patrick L Taylor; S Jean Emans; Daniel J Nigrin; Kenneth D Mandl Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2008-08-28 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Macda Gerard; Hannah Chimowitz; Alan Fossa; Fabienne Bourgeois; Leonor Fernandez; Sigall K Bell Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Eric Wright; Jonathan Darer; Xiaoqin Tang; Jason Thompson; Lorraine Tusing; Alan Fossa; Tom Delbanco; Long Ngo; Jan Walker Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Simone Arvisais-Anhalt; May Lau; Christoph U Lehmann; A Jay Holmgren; Richard J Medford; Charina M Ramirez; Clifford N Chen Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 7.076
Authors: Wui Ip; Samuel Yang; Jacob Parker; Austin Powell; James Xie; Keith Morse; Rachael C Aikens; Jennifer Lee; Manjot Gill; Shravani Vundavalli; Yungui Huang; Jeannie Huang; Jonathan H Chen; Jeffrey Hoffman; Cynthia Kuelbs; Natalie Pageler Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-09-01