Literature DB >> 32988814

Inter-rater reliability of paediatric emergency assessment: physiological and clinical features.

Calvin Heal1, Sarah Cotterill2, Andrew Graeme Rowland3,4, Natalie Garratt5, Tony Long3, Stephen Brown5, Grainne O'Connor5, Chloe Rishton5, Steve Woby5, Damian Roland6,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Paediatric Admission Guidance in the Emergency Department (PAGE) score is an assessment tool currently in development that helps predict hospital admission using components including patient characteristics, vital signs (heart rate, temperature, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation) and clinical features (eg, breathing, behaviour and nurse judgement). It aims to assist in safe admission and discharge decision making in environments such as emergency departments and urgent care centres. Determining the inter-rater reliability of scoring tools such as PAGE can be difficult. The aim of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability of seven clinical components of the PAGE Score.
DESIGN: Inter-rater reliability was measured by each patient having their clinical components recorded by two separate raters in succession. The first rater was the assessing nurse, and the second rater was a research nurse.
SETTING: Two emergency departments and one urgent care centre in the North West of England. Measurements were recorded over 1 week; data were collected for half a day at each of the three sites. PATIENTS: A convenience sample of 90 paediatric attendees (aged 0-16 years), 30 from each of the three sites. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two independent measures for each child were compared using kappa or prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK). Bland-Altman plots were also constructed for continuous measurements.
RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability ranged from moderate (0.62 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.74) weighted kappa) to very good (0.98 (95% CI 95 to 0.99) weighted kappa) for all measurements except 'nurse judgement' for which agreement was fair (0.30, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.50 PABAK). Complete information from both raters on all the clinical components of the PAGE score were available for 73 children (81%). These total scores showed good' inter-rater reliability (0.64 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.74) weighted kappa).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest different nurses would demonstrate good inter-rater reliability when collecting acute assessments needed for the PAGE score, reinforcing the applicability of the tool. The importance of determining reliability in scoring systems is highlighted and a suitable methodology was presented. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accident & emergency; general paediatrics; paediatric practice

Year:  2020        PMID: 32988814      PMCID: PMC7841473          DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  7 in total

1.  Inter-rater reliability in a bespoke scoring tool: the Paediatric Observation Priority Score.

Authors:  Adam Bonfield; Damian Roland
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Validity of different pediatric early warning scores in the emergency department.

Authors:  Nienke Seiger; Ian Maconochie; Rianne Oostenbrink; Henriëtte A Moll
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  What can the randomness of missing values tell you about clinical practice in large data sets of children's vital signs?

Authors:  Damian Roland; Neslihan Suzen; Timothy J Coats; Jeremy Levesley; Alexander N Gorban; Evgeny M Mirkes
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.756

4.  Inter-rater reliability in the Paediatric Observation Priority Score (POPS).

Authors:  Lisa Langton; Adam Bonfield; Damian Roland
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Validity and effectiveness of paediatric early warning systems and track and trigger tools for identifying and reducing clinical deterioration in hospitalised children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rob Trubey; Chao Huang; Fiona V Lugg-Widger; Kerenza Hood; Davina Allen; Dawn Edwards; David Lacy; Amy Lloyd; Mala Mann; Brendan Mason; Alison Oliver; Damian Roland; Gerri Sefton; Richard Skone; Emma Thomas-Jones; Lyvonne N Tume; Colin Powell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-05       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of PAT-POPS and ManChEWS for admissions of children from the emergency department.

Authors:  Sarah Cotterill; Andrew G Rowland; Jacqueline Kelly; Helen Lees; Mohammed Kamara
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Refining and testing the diagnostic accuracy of an assessment tool (PAT-POPS) to predict admission and discharge of children and young people who attend an emergency department: protocol for an observational study.

Authors:  Samah Riaz; Andrew Rowland; Steve Woby; Tony Long; Joan Livesley; Sarah Cotterill; Calvin Heal; Damian Roland
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 2.125

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.