Literature DB >> 32988670

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Guided Transoral Core Needle Biopsy: A Novel, Safe and Well-Tolerated Procedure for Obtaining High-Quality Tissue in Patients with Oral Cancer.

Ting Wei1, Man Lu2, Lu Wang1, Zirui Jiang3, Minggang Wu1, Juan Li1, Ziyue Hu1, Xueqing Cheng1, Tingting Li1, Zhenqi Zhang1, Xiaobo Wu1, Bo Tan1, Jifen Liao4.   

Abstract

The aim of the prospective study described here was to compare the tolerability, safety and diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided transoral core needle biopsy (CEUS-CNB) with that of conventional US-guided transoral CNB (US-CNB) and standard incisional biopsy in patients with oral masses. Between June 2017 and November 2019, consecutive patients with oral masses referred for biopsy were randomly assigned to undergo incisional biopsy, US-CNB or CEUS-CNB. Procedure time, intra‑operative blood loss volume, diagnostic performance and pain level before and after the procedure assessed by visual analogue score (VAS) were recorded and compared among the three procedures. Finally, 238 patients with pathology confirmation were analyzed: 80 patients underwent incisional biopsy, 78 patients US-CNB and 80 patients CEUS-CNB. In this study, no significant difference was found in biopsy time between CEUS-CNB, US-CNB and incisional biopsy (75 ± 11 s vs. 73.6 ± 12 s vs. 77 ± 13 s, p = 0.24). CEUS-CNB achieved the highest sensitivity (CEUS-CNB: 100%, US-CNB: 88.5%, incisional biopsy: 84.3%), negative predictive value (CEUS-CNB: 100%, US-CNB: 81.3%, incisional biopsy: 78.4%) and accuracy (CEUS-CNB: 100%, US-CNB: 92.3%, incisional biopsy: 90%). The VAS score for incision biopsy was higher (p = 0.01) and the amount of bleeding was larger (p < 0.001), yet there was no significant difference between CEUS-CNB and US-CNB. Our results indicate CEUS-guided transoral CNB is an efficient, safe and well-tolerated procedure, with biopsy time comparable to and diagnostic performance better than those of conventional US-guided transoral CNB and incisional biopsy.
Copyright © 2020 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Contrast medium; Oral cancer; Ultrasonography

Year:  2020        PMID: 32988670     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  4 in total

1.  Comparative study on efficacy and safety of ultrasound guided transoral and transcutaneous core needle biopsy in patients with oral masses.

Authors:  Ting Wei; Man Lu; Juan Li; Ziyue Hu; Tingting Li; Xueqing Cheng; Lu Wang; Wei Pu
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 1.930

2.  Transnasal Endoscopic and Transoral Approaches in the Biopsies of Ventral Atlas and Axis Vertebrae: A Comprehensive Retrospective Study for Preprocedural Scheme, Biopsy Procedure, Core Technique Analysis, Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Xianhao Shao; Jianmin Li; Qiang Yang; Ka Li; Yuan Yao; Feifei Sun; Zhenfeng Li
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 3.  A Systematic Review of Oral Biopsies, Sample Types, and Detection Techniques Applied in Relation to Oral Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Guanghuan Yang; Luqi Wei; Benjamin K S Thong; Yuanyuan Fu; Io Hong Cheong; Zisis Kozlakidis; Xue Li; Hui Wang; Xiaoguang Li
Journal:  BioTech (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-02

4.  Ultrasound-guided microwave ablation in the treatment of early-stage tongue cancer.

Authors:  Jianquan Yang; Wen Guo; Rong Huang; Zhengmin Xu; Chunyang Zhou; Man Lu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 5.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.