| Literature DB >> 32988516 |
Wenjing Wang1, Chunguang Wang1, Zichuang Zhang2, Peng Zhang1, Shanshan Yao1, Jingru Liu1, Xianghe Zhai1, Tie Zhang3.
Abstract
In this study, specific primers and fluorescent probes were designed to target the thymidine kinase (TK) gene sequence of avian infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV). Through specificity and sensitivity tests, a real-time fluorescence-based recombinase-aided amplification (RF-RAA) method for detecting ILTV was established. The results showed that the method was specific and could be used to accurately detect ILTV, and there was no cross-reaction with Newcastle disease virus (NDV), avian influenza virus (AIV), or infectious bronchitis virus (IBV). Real-time fluorescence-based recombinase-aided amplification had high sensitivity, and the lowest detectable limit (LDL) for ILTV could reach 10 copies/μL, 1,000 times more sensitive than conventional PCR (104 copies/μL), to rival that of real-time fluorescence-based quantitative PCR (RFQ-PCR) (10 copies/μL). This method and RFQ-PCR were used to detect 96 samples of chicken throat swabs with ILT initially diagnosed in clinic from the north of China, and the coincidence rate of the 2 methods was 100%. The RF-RAA reaction required only 20-30 minutes to completing, and its sensitivity was much higher than that of conventional PCR. Real-time fluorescence-based recombinase-aided amplification is similar to RFQ-PCR and has the advantages of specificity, sensitivity, and high efficiency, so it is suitable for early clinical detection and epidemiological investigation of ILTV.Entities:
Keywords: TK gene; infectious laryngotracheitis virus; real-time fluorescence-based recombinase-aided amplification
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32988516 PMCID: PMC7598125 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
Figure 1Sensitivity verification of 3 kinds of technology in ILTV detection. (A) Sensitivity verification of RF-RAA in ILTV detection.1: Negative control; 2-7: Template concentration was 100-105 copies/μL. The results showed that the lowest detectable limit of RF-RAA was 10 copies/μL. B. Sensitivity verification of RFQ-PCR in ILTV detection.1: Negative control; 2-8: Template concentration was 100-106 copies/μL. The results showed that the lowest detectable limit of RFQ-PCR was 10 copies/μL. C. Sensitivity verification of conventional PCR in ILTV detection. M: Marker; 1-8: Template concentration was 107-100 copies/μL; 9: Negative control. The results showed that the lowest detectable limit of conventional PCR was 104copies/μL. Abbreviations: RF-RAA, real-time fluorescence-based recombinase-aided amplification; RFQ-PCR, real-time fluorescence-based quantitative PCR.
The comprehensive comparison of 3 techniques for ILTV detection.
| Method | Primer design | Enzyme components | Instrument price | Response time | Reaction temperature | Cross-reaction | LDL | Degree of detection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RF-RAA | 1 pair of primers, 1 probe | Recombinase, SSB, and polymerase | Cheap | 20–30 min | 37°C Constant | No | 1-10 copies/μL | Real time quantitative, qualitative |
| RFQ-PCR | 1 pair of primers | Taq polymerase | Expensive | 1–2 hour | High and variable | No | 10 copies/μL | Real time quantitative, qualitative |
| Conventional PCR | 1 pair of primers | Taq polymerase | Expensive | 2–3 hour | High and variable | No | 104 copies/μL | Qualitative |
Abbreviations: RF-RAA, real-time fluorescence-based recombinase-aided amplification; RFQ-PCR, real-time fluorescence-based quantitative PCR; SSB, single-strand DNA-binding protein.