| Literature DB >> 32987429 |
Žiga Snoj1,2, Timea Hebar3, Luca Maria Sconfienza4,5, Filip Maria H M Vanhoenacker6,7, Maryam Shahabpour8, Vladka Salapura1,2, Amanda Isaac9,10, Eleni Drakonaki11,12, Yurii Vasilev13, Jean-Luc Drape14, Miraude Adriaensen15, Klaus Friedrich16, Giuseppe Guglielmi17, Alberto Vieira18, Hatice Tuba Sanal19, Liisa Kerttula20, Johan Castberg Hellund21, Judit Nagy22, Andreas Heuck23, Matthieu Rutten24, Maria Tzalonikou25, Ulrich Hansen26, Joanna Niemunis-Sawicka27, Fabio Becce28, Enzo Silvestri29, Eva Llopis San Juan30, Klaus Wörtler31.
Abstract
No official data exist on the status of musculoskeletal (MSK) radiology in Europe. The Committee for National Societies conducted an international survey to understand the status of training, subspecialization, and local practice among the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) partner societies. This article reports the results of that survey. An online questionnaire was distributed to all 26 European national associations that act as official partner societies of the ESSR. The 24 questions were subdivided into six sections: society structure, relationship with the national radiological society, subspecialization, present radiology practice, MSK interventional procedures, and MSK ultrasound. The findings of our study show a lack of standardized training and/or accreditation methods in the field of MSK radiology at a national level. The European diploma in musculoskeletal radiology is directed to partly overcome this problem; however, this certification is still underrecognized. Using certification methods, a more homogeneous European landscape could be created in the future with a view to subspecialist training. MSK ultrasound and MSK interventional procedures should be performed by a health professional with a solid knowledge of the relevant imaging modalities and sufficient training in MSK radiology. Recognition of MSK radiology as an official subspecialty would make the field more attractive for younger colleagues as well as attracting the brightest and best, an important key to further development of both clinical and academic radiology. KEY POINTS: · Standardized training and/or accreditation methods in the field of MSK radiology is lacking at a national level.. · With certification methods, such as the European diploma in musculoskeletal radiology, a more homogeneous European landscape could be created in the future with a view to subspecialist training.. · Recognition of MSK radiology as an official subspecialty would make the field more attractive for younger colleagues as well as attracting the brightest and best, an important key to further development of both clinical and academic radiology.. Thieme. All rights reserved.Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32987429 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Semin Musculoskelet Radiol ISSN: 1089-7860 Impact factor: 1.777