Literature DB >> 32986980

Work a key determinant in COVID-19 risk.

Alessandro Marinaccio1, Ranieri Guerra2, Sergio Iavicoli3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32986980      PMCID: PMC7518834          DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30411-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Glob Health        ISSN: 2214-109X            Impact factor:   26.763


× No keyword cloud information.
Using prevalence figures from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2017, Andrew Clark and colleagues (August, 2020) estimated the global numbers of individuals at increased risk of severe COVID-19. Age, sex, and country were considered variables of interest, and a list of underlying health conditions relevant to the disease risk were included in the analysis, grouped into 11 categories. 1·7 billion people (22% [UI 15–38] of the global population) were estimated to be at risk of severe COVID-19, with increased risk for men, older people, African countries with high HIV/AIDS prevalence, and nations with high diabetes prevalence. Ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation, and obesity were cited as other risk factors for severe COVID-19. However, occupational risk was not assessed nor cited as a potential risk factor in the study by Clark and colleagues. Despite the absence of systematic studies on work-related risk factors for COVID-19, the pandemic has been described as a substantial challenge for occupational health and several types of working condition have been reported as putting workers at risk of infection worldwide. At highest occupational risk are health-care workers, emergency response workers, and workers in social services and the care of older people. Clusters of other occupationally exposed groups have been reported. Outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have occurred in factories operated by the meat and poultry processing industry. In such an environment, crowded living and transport conditions, numerous high-touch areas, and difficulties with workplace physical distancing could result in high risk for SARS-CoV-2 transmission. In Italy, according to compensation claims, SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred at the workplace in 19·4% of all cases; 30% of people of working age (15–65 years) became infected in the workplace. Health-care workers have been recognised as the most involved occupational category (29 548 affected individuals as of July 5, 2020, in Italy), and these individuals' dual role as victims and vectors must be highlighted. It will be important to implement policies that adequately factor in the occupational dimension of risk. Specific risk management at workplaces, protection of vulnerable workers, and the development of an occupational epidemiological surveillance system has to be considered as a priority in anti-COVID-19 strategies and in the management of vaccination policies.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Booster Doses of Anti COVID-19 Vaccines: An Overview of Implementation Policies among OECD and EU Countries.

Authors:  Fabrizio Bert; Giacomo Scaioli; Lorenzo Vola; Davide Accortanzo; Giuseppina Lo Moro; Roberta Siliquini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in health care workers at a tertiary care academic medical center - An assessment of occupational infection risk.

Authors:  Derek Forster; Nan Lin; Justin Levens; Rachael Stone; Scott Berry; Eric Durbin; C Darrell Jennings; Robert DiPaola; Jill M Kolesar
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 4.303

3.  Validation of a COVID-19 Job Exposure Matrix (COVID-19-JEM) for Occupational Risk of a SARS-CoV-2 Infection at Work: Using Data of Dutch Workers.

Authors:  Sophie van der Feltz; Susan Peters; Anjoeka Pronk; Vivi Schlünssen; Zara A Stokholm; Henrik A Kolstad; Karin van Veldhoven; Ioannis Basinas; Martie van Tongeren; Alex Burdorf; Karen M Oude Hengel
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.779

4.  Association of working shifts, inside and outside of healthcare, with severe COVID-19: an observational study.

Authors:  T Yates; K Khunti; A V Rowlands; C Gillies; Y Chudasama; M J Davies; N Islam; D E Kloecker; C Lawson; M Pareek; C Razieh; F Zaccardi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  SARS-CoV-2 and Asbestos Exposure: Can Our Experience With Mesothelioma Patients Help Us Understand the Psychological Consequences of COVID-19 and Develop Interventions?

Authors:  Antonella Granieri; Michela Bonafede; Alessandro Marinaccio; Ivano Iavarone; Daniela Marsili; Isabella Giulia Franzoi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-12-22

6.  Role and Tasks of the Occupational Physician during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Lorenzo Spagnolo; Luigi Vimercati; Antonio Caputi; Marcello Benevento; Luigi De Maria; Davide Ferorelli; Biagio Solarino
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  Temporal trend in the compensation claim applications for work-related COVID-19 in Italy.

Authors:  Alessandro Marinaccio; Adelina Brusco; Andrea Bucciarelli; Silvia D'Amario; Sergio Iavicoli
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 1.275

8.  COVID-19 Impact on Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine Research: Maintaining Lab Continuity.

Authors:  Livia Roseti; Brunella Grigolo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.