Literature DB >> 3298658

Promoter properties and negative regulation of the uvrA gene by the LexA repressor and its amino-terminal DNA binding domain.

E Bertrand-Burggraf, S Hurstel, M Daune, M Schnarr.   

Abstract

A comparative study of the interaction of the LexA repressor of Escherichia coli and of its amino-terminal DNA binding domain to the uvrA operator has been undertaken. Most of the binding constants are determined from competition experiments with RNA polymerase by measuring the time-course of the abortive initiation transcriptional activity. The presence of repressor increases the lag time, tau, without affecting the final maximum activity. The inhibition of transcription by LexA, at least in the case of the uvrA gene, is thus a transient, time-dependent phenomenon, because once the RNA polymerase is engaged in a stable "open" complex, it is quasi-irreversibly trapped in this state. A study of the binding constants as a function of ionic strength suggests the formation of 5.5(+/- 1) salt bridges between the uvrA operator and a LexA dimer. Surprisingly, the binding affinity of the amino-terminal domain was only about one order of magnitude smaller than that of the entire LexA repressor. The determination of the binding constant of the RNA polymerase to the "closed" uvrA promoter (KB approximately 1 X 10(7) to 2 X 10(7) M-1) allowed us to determine theoretical repression curves for the two repressor species. These calculations show that the binding constant found for LexA is sufficiently high to account for substantial or complete repression, and that of the amino-terminal domain is sufficiently low to account for partial or nearly full induction. Under solvent conditions used by others for the determination of binding constants to other SOS operators by DNAase I footprinting, the uvrA operator turns out to be a rather weak one (K approximately 3 X 10(7) M-1), being comparable with that of the uvrB gene. The uvrA promoter is "association-limited" with a KB X k2 product fitting very nicely the homology score for the promoter of 55.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3298658     DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90220-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  20 in total

Review 1.  Repression of transcription initiation in bacteria.

Authors:  F Rojo
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Characterization of the two Mycobacterium tuberculosis recA promoters.

Authors:  Krishna K Gopaul; Patricia C Brooks; Jean-François Prost; Elaine O Davis
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Genetic analysis of the LexA repressor: isolation and characterization of LexA(Def) mutant proteins.

Authors:  P Oertel-Buchheit; R M Lamerichs; M Schnarr; M Granger-Schnarr
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1990-08

4.  Identification of some DNA damage-inducible genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: apparent lack of correlation with LexA binding.

Authors:  P C Brooks; F Movahedzadeh; E O Davis
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  The amino-terminal domain of LexA repressor is alpha-helical but differs from canonical helix-turn-helix proteins: a two-dimensional 1H NMR study.

Authors:  R M Lamerichs; A Padilla; R Boelens; R Kaptein; G Ottleben; H Rüterjans; M Granger-Schnarr; P Oertel; M Schnarr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Determination of DNA sequences required for regulated Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecA expression in response to DNA-damaging agents suggests that two modes of regulation exist.

Authors:  F Movahedzadeh; M J Colston; E O Davis
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Rhodobacter sphaeroides LexA has dual activity: optimising and repressing recA gene transcription.

Authors:  Angels Tapias; Silvia Fernández; Juan C Alonso; Jordi Barbé
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  DNA sequence determinants of LexA-induced DNA bending.

Authors:  R Lloubès; C Lazdunski; M Granger-Schnarr; M Schnarr
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Transcriptional repression: conserved and evolved features.

Authors:  Sandhya Payankaulam; Li M Li; David N Arnosti
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Repressor CopG prevents access of RNA polymerase to promoter and actively dissociates open complexes.

Authors:  Ana M Hernández-Arriaga; Tania S Rubio-Lepe; Manuel Espinosa; Gloria del Solar
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.