Jeong Hee Yoon1, Jae Seok Bae1, Siwon Jang2, Jeong Min Lee3. 1. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea. 2. Department of Radiology, SMG - SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. 3. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea. jmsh@snu.ac.kr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether reduced field-of-view (rFOV) DWI sequences can improve image quality and diagnostic performance compared with conventional full FOV (fFOV) DWI in the prediction of complete response (CR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancers. METHODS: Between September 2015 and December 2017, seventy-three patients with locally advanced rectal cancers (≥ T3 or lymph node positive) who underwent CRT and subsequent surgery were included in this retrospective study. All patients had tumor located no more than 10 cm from the anal verge, and underwent rectal MRI including fFOV b-1000 DWI and rFOV b-1000 DWI at 3 T before and after CRT. Image quality and diagnostic performance in predicting CR were compared between rFOV DWI and fFOV DWI sets by two reviewers. RESULTS: Based on a 12-point scale, rFOV DWI provided better image quality scores than fFOV DWI (9.1 ± 1.7 vs. 8.4 ± 1.0, respectively, P < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy (Az) in evaluating CR was better with the rFOV DWI set than with the fFOV DWI set for both reviewers: reviewer 1, 0.78 vs. 0.57 (P = .004); reviewer 2, 0.72 vs. 0.61 (P = .031). CONCLUSION: rFOV DWI of rectal cancer can provide better overall image quality, and its addition to conventional rectal MRI may provide better diagnostic accuracy than fFOV DWI in the evaluation of CR to neoadjuvant CRT in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
PURPOSE: To determine whether reduced field-of-view (rFOV) DWI sequences can improve image quality and diagnostic performance compared with conventional full FOV (fFOV) DWI in the prediction of complete response (CR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancers. METHODS: Between September 2015 and December 2017, seventy-three patients with locally advanced rectal cancers (≥ T3 or lymph node positive) who underwent CRT and subsequent surgery were included in this retrospective study. All patients had tumor located no more than 10 cm from the anal verge, and underwent rectal MRI including fFOV b-1000 DWI and rFOV b-1000 DWI at 3 T before and after CRT. Image quality and diagnostic performance in predicting CR were compared between rFOV DWI and fFOV DWI sets by two reviewers. RESULTS: Based on a 12-point scale, rFOV DWI provided better image quality scores than fFOV DWI (9.1 ± 1.7 vs. 8.4 ± 1.0, respectively, P < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy (Az) in evaluating CR was better with the rFOV DWI set than with the fFOV DWI set for both reviewers: reviewer 1, 0.78 vs. 0.57 (P = .004); reviewer 2, 0.72 vs. 0.61 (P = .031). CONCLUSION: rFOV DWI of rectal cancer can provide better overall image quality, and its addition to conventional rectal MRI may provide better diagnostic accuracy than fFOV DWI in the evaluation of CR to neoadjuvant CRT in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.