| Literature DB >> 32983327 |
Olunike Blessing Olofinbiyi1, Makhosazane Dube1, Euphemia Mbali Mhlongo1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: triage is gradually becoming an autonomous nursing role essential to patients' safety and the efficient delivery of emergency care. The increased need for more holistic and advanced care during triage makes the role of nurses during triage highly indispensable. However, several studies have shown that nurse-led triage has been so successful over the years in most African countries and in other developing countries. South African Triage Scale (SATS) is an example of triage tool that was designed in such a way that the lowest cadre nurse can successfully implement. The success recorded by this tool made most African countries and some other developing countries adopt the tool. The study was designed to explore the roles of nurses during triage in a selected public hospital in KwaZulu-Natal province.Entities:
Keywords: Emergency care; KwaZulu-Natal; nurses’ perceptions; nursing roles; public hospital; triage
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32983327 PMCID: PMC7501752 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2020.37.9.22211
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
percentage distribution of respondents on the roles of nurses during triage
| Roles of Nurses | Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly agree | Total (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The nurse must be at the frontline of the unit | 0% ( n=0) | 1% (n=1) | 6% (n=6) | 49 (n=49) | 44 (n=44) | 100% (n=100) |
| Manage the waiting room and control overcrowding. | 0% (n=0) | 0% (n=0) | 13% (n=13) | 57% (n=57 | 30% (n=30) | 100% (n=100) |
| Initiate contact with patients and family | 1% (n=1) | 2% (n=2) | 9% (n=9) | 53 (n=53) | 35 (n=35) | 100% (n=100) |
| Keep patients and relatives informed of delays and expected time to be seen | 0% (n=0) | 1% (n=1) | 9% (n=9) | 52% (n=52) | 38% (38) | 100% (n=100) |
| Institute first aid measures where necessary | 0% (n=0) | 1% (n=1) | 5% (n=5) | 55% (n=55) | 39% (n=39) | 100% (n=100) |
| Assessment (history taking) of patients | 0% (n=0) | 0% (n=0) | 10% (n=10) | 61% (n=61) | 29% (n=29) | 100% (n=100) |
| Focused physical examination and taking of vital signs | 1% (n=1) | 0% (n=0) | 6% (n=6) | 56% (n=56) | 37% (n=37) | 100% (n=100) |
| Brief investigations such as urinalysis and PCV | 1% (n=1) | 2% (n=2) | 6% (n=6) | 68% (n=68) | 23% (n=23) | 100% (n=100) |
| Prioritization of patients | 0% (n=0) | 0% (n=0) | 4% (n=4) | 51% (n=51) | 45% (n=45) | 100% (n=100) |
| Documentation | 0% (n=0) | 0% (n=0) | 5% (n=5) | 54% (n=54) | 41% (n=41) | 100% (n=100) |
| Infection control | 0% (n=0) | 0% (n=0) | 6% (n=6) | 56% (n=56) | 38% (n=38) | 100% (n=100) |
| Manage patient flow through the unit | 0% (n=0) | 0% (n=0) | 4% (n=4) | 57% (n=57) | 39% (n=39) | 100% (n=100) |
cross-tabulation of nurses' years of work experience and their roles during triage
| Years of work experience/roles | p-value | Df | Chi-Square |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.001 | 32 | 50.799 | |
| Total number of Valid Cases | 100 | ||