Robert F Valois1, Keith J Zullig2, Larry K Brown3, Michael P Carey3, Peter A Vanable4, Daniel Romer5, Ralph J DiClemente6. 1. Department of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, Schools of Public Health and Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA. 2. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA. 3. Miriam Hospital and Brown University, Centers for Behavioral & Preventive Medicine, Providence, RI, 02903 USA. 4. Department of Psychology, Center for Health and Behavior, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA. 5. Adolescent Communication Institute, Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA. 6. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY 10003 USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Health promotion/education strive to promote healthful conditions that improve quality of life1 based on the perceptions of those whose lives are affected.2-4 Though health promotion/education might have instrumental value in reducing risks for premature morbidity and mortality, their ultimate value lies in contributions to quality of life.1 Life satisfaction (LS) has been defined as an individual's assessment of their quality of life based upon personal criteria5,6 and linked to adolescent health risk behaviors7,8 and developmental assets.9. PURPOSE: We investigated the psychometrics of the Brief Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale [BMSLSS] with an adolescent sample of African Americans (N=1,658) from four mid-sized cities in the United States (US). Reliability and validity of the BMSLSS has not been determined for samples of exclusively African American adolescents. METHODS: Data analysis included calculating mean ratings, standard deviations and effect sizes (Cohen's d) and inspecting the scale's internal structure, reliability, and relationships to other variables. RESULTS: Evidence of internal structure, internal consistency reliability, and hypothesized relationships to other variables for participants were determined. TRANSLATION TO HEALTH EDUCATION PRACTICE: The BMSLSS is a useful indicator of LS for research and health education assessment purposes among African American adolescents where brevity of psychometric measures is imperative.
BACKGROUND: Health promotion/education strive to promote healthful conditions that improve quality of life1 based on the perceptions of those whose lives are affected.2-4 Though health promotion/education might have instrumental value in reducing risks for premature morbidity and mortality, their ultimate value lies in contributions to quality of life.1 Life satisfaction (LS) has been defined as an individual's assessment of their quality of life based upon personal criteria5,6 and linked to adolescent health risk behaviors7,8 and developmental assets.9. PURPOSE: We investigated the psychometrics of the Brief Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale [BMSLSS] with an adolescent sample of African Americans (N=1,658) from four mid-sized cities in the United States (US). Reliability and validity of the BMSLSS has not been determined for samples of exclusively African American adolescents. METHODS: Data analysis included calculating mean ratings, standard deviations and effect sizes (Cohen's d) and inspecting the scale's internal structure, reliability, and relationships to other variables. RESULTS: Evidence of internal structure, internal consistency reliability, and hypothesized relationships to other variables for participants were determined. TRANSLATION TO HEALTH EDUCATION PRACTICE: The BMSLSS is a useful indicator of LS for research and health education assessment purposes among African American adolescents where brevity of psychometric measures is imperative.
Entities:
Keywords:
African American; adolescents; life satisfaction; psychometric measurement; quality of life; reliability; validity
Authors: D C Des Jarlais; D Paone; J Milliken; C F Turner; H Miller; J Gribble; Q Shi; H Hagan; S R Friedman Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-05-15 Impact factor: 79.321