| Literature DB >> 32982486 |
Gebrehiwot Gebremedhin Tafere1, Kald Beshir Tuem1, Abadi Kahsu Gebre1, Rajkapoor Balasubramaniam1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Liver disease is a major public health threat, particularly in developing countries. Several medicinal plants and formulations have been claimed to have liver protective activities. The present study aimed to evaluate in vitro antioxidant and in vivo hepatoprotective activities of root bark extracts of Croton macrostachyus (Euphorbiaceae).Entities:
Keywords: Croton macrostachyus; antioxidant; biochemical parameters; hepatoprotective; liver damage; paracetamol
Year: 2020 PMID: 32982486 PMCID: PMC7493212 DOI: 10.2147/JEP.S259081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Pharmacol ISSN: 1179-1454
Phytochemical Constituents of the Root Bark Extracts of Croton Macrostachyus
| Constituents | Test | Crude Extract | Aqueous Fraction | Chloroform Fraction | Indicator | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alkaloids | Mayer’s test | + | Whitish opalescence | |||
| Wagner’s test | Reddish brown | |||||
| Anthraquinones | Borntrager’s Test | Pink to red | ||||
| Polyphenol | Ferric Chloride Test | Blue green | ||||
| Flavonoids | Shinoda reduction test | Magnesium | Orange | |||
| Zink | ||||||
| Saponins | Foam test | Foam persistence | ||||
| Tannins | Gelatin test | Precipitate formation | ||||
| Coumarins | Ammonia test | Intense fluorescence | ||||
Notes: +→ presence, – → absence.
DPPH Scavenging Activities of Crude Extract and Solvent Fractions
| Concentration (µg/mL) | Percentage Radical Scavenging Activity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ascorbic Acid | Crude Extract | Aqueous Fraction | Chloroform Fraction | |
| 12.5 | 40.9 | 17.7 | 6.6 | 5.8 |
| 25 | 47.5 | 21.8 | 8 | 6.4 |
| 50 | 58.7 | 26.5 | 17.5 | 9.7 |
| 100 | 70.7 | 40.6 | 34 | 17.1 |
| 200 | 86 | 71 | 57.2 | 26.2 |
| IC50 (µg/µL) | 30.8 | 128.6 | 168.9 | 406 |
Abbreviation: IC50, 50% inhibitory concentration.
Effects of Crude Extract and Solvent Fractions on Liver Weight Variation
| Treatment Group | Dose | Liver Weight (g) |
|---|---|---|
| Normal | 5%DMSO | 1.16±0.09 |
| Paracetamol | 250mg/kg | 1.47±0.07a |
| Silymarin | 100mg/kg | 1.17±0.06* |
| Crude | 100mg/kg | 1.30±0.03 |
| 200mg/kg | 1.23±0.04 | |
| 400mg/kg | 1.18±0.02* | |
| Aqueous | 100mg/kg | 1.33±0.06 |
| 200mg/kg | 1.28±0.05 | |
| 400mg/kg | 1.19±0.06* | |
| Chloroform | 100mg/kg | 1.33±0.10 |
| 200mg/kg | 1.26±0.08 | |
| 400mg/kg | 1.21±0.04* |
Notes: N= 6, Results were expressed as Mean ±SEM. aP<0.01Vs Normal; *P<0.05 Vs paracetamol. Data were analyzed by One-Way ANOVA followed by Dunnet multiple comparison test.
Abbreviation: DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.
Effects of Crude Extract and Fractions on Biochemical Parameters Against Paracetamol-Induced Hepatotoxicity in Mice
| Serum Enzyme Levels | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | AST (U/L) | ALT(U/L) | ALP (U/L) | Total Bilirubin (mg/dl) | Total Protein |
| Normal(5% DMSO) | 105.83±3.46 | 56.83±2.91 | 219.66±7.12 | 0.45±0.04 | 8.48±0.93 |
| Paracetamol (250mg/kg) | 313.50±13.75a | 164.06±6.95a | 506.72±16.38a | 1.27±0.07a | 4.68±0.48b |
| Silymarin (100mg/kg) | 161.50±5.60*** | 82.33±3.49*** | 268.83±6.26*** | 0.70±0.08*** | 8.00±0.57** |
| Crude(100mg/kg) | 250.55±9.49*** | 122.6±5.48*** | 381.50±10.86*** | 1.07±0.05 | 6.67±0.45 |
| Crude(200mg/kg) | 214.46±5.91 | 103.43±6.87*** | 325.28±11.47*** | 0.99±0.06* | 6.91±0.37 |
| Crude (400mg/kg) | 183.42±5.86*** | 91.10±4.26*** | 303.98±8.47*** | 0.72±0.04*** | 7.90±0.55* |
| Aqueous(100mg/kg) | 242.03±7.35*** | 119.67±4.66*** | 402.04±9.28*** | 1.02±0.03 | 6.73±0.84 |
| Aqueous(200mg/kg) | 205.87±6.05*** | 98.72±5.08*** | 360.12±8.05*** | 0.96±0.0.07** | 7.16±0.45 |
| Aqueous (400mg/kg) | 197.65±5.68*** | 86.33±4.67*** | 317.21±10.72*** | 0.82±0.0.06*** | 7.86±0.37* |
| Chloroform(100mg/kg) | 256.47±8.14*** | 121.47±6.90*** | 416.32±12.72*** | 1.08±0.03** | 6.38±0.51 |
| Chloroform(200mg/kg) | 215.10±7.62*** | 104.57±5.48*** | 389.18±8.52*** | 0.98±0.05* | 6.93±0.49 |
| Chloroform(400mg/kg) | 196.55±4.84*** | 96.42±4.34*** | 321.50±9.35*** | 0.86±0.04*** | 7.29±0.68 |
Notes: N= 6; Results were expressed in mean ± SEM. aP<0.001;bP<0.01 Vs Normal group animals; ***P<0.001,**P<0.01, *P<0.05 vs paracetamol group animals. Data were analyzed by One-Way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test.
Abbreviation: DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.
Figure 1Continued.
Figure 1Histopathological changes of liver tissues (10x and 40x). (A) Normal control group (Normal hepatic cells with normal liver architecture) (B) paracetamol group (Necrotic hepatocytes, severe degeneration, hyperaemic/condensed blood vessels and cells with inflammation); Black arrow shows damaged hepatocytes. (C) Standard group (Liver architecture normal, cells with mild inflammation); Black arrow shows normal hepatocytes (D) Crude extract 100 mg/kg (Aggravated necrotic cells); Black arrow shows necrotized cells. (E) Crude extract 200 mg/kg (More necrotic hepatocytes and regenerated cells); Black arrow shows regenerated cells. (F) Crude extract 400mg/kg (Hepatocytes are normal in appearance with some mitotic figures); Black arrow shows normal hepatocytes. (G) Aqueous fraction 100mg/kg (Necrotized cells are by far more than normal cells); Black arrow shows necrotized hepatocytes. (H) Aqueous fraction 200 mg/kg (Normal hepatocytes are fewer than in Aqueous fraction 400mg/kg and haemorrhage); Black arrow shows haemorrhages. (I) Aqueous fraction 400 mg/kg (Most cells are normal with some dead cells and regenerated cells); Black arrow shows regenerated cells. (J) Chloroform fraction 100mg/kg (Shows inflammation and degeneration of hepatocytes); Black arrow shows degenerated cells. (K) Chloroform fraction 200 mg/kg (Mild inflammation and degeneration; regeneration). (L) Chloroform fraction 400mg/kg (Almost normal hepatocytes with mitotic figures); Black arrow shows normal hepatocytes.