| Literature DB >> 32982436 |
Wolf Bäumler1, Mareike Sebald2, Ingo Einspieler1, Andreas Schicho1, Jan Schaible1, Philipp Wiggermann3, Marco Dollinger1, Christian Stroszczynski1, Lukas Philipp Beyer4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the incidence and evolution of biliary alterations adjacent to the ablation area in patients with hepatic malignancies during the first 3 months after percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) and to investigate associated changes in laboratory values.Entities:
Keywords: bile ducts; electroporation; hepatic tumors
Year: 2020 PMID: 32982436 PMCID: PMC7507879 DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S261838
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Manag Res ISSN: 1179-1322 Impact factor: 3.989
Baseline Patient and Disease Characteristics
| Characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Age (y) | |
| Mean ± SD | 68.3 ±11.6 |
| Range | 43–90 |
| Sex, n (%) | |
| Male | 34 (75.6) |
| Female | 11 (24.4) |
| Tumor diameter (cm) | |
| Mean ± SD | 2.0 ± 1.1 |
| Range | 0.4–4.4 |
| Patients with liver cirrhosis, n (%) | 16 (35.6) |
| Tumor localization, n (%) | |
| Segment I | 2 (3.2) |
| Segment II | 6 (9.7) |
| Segment III | 3 (4.8) |
| Segment IVa | 7 (11.3) |
| Segment IVb | 8 (12.9) |
| Segment V | 13 (21.0) |
| Segment VI | 7 (11.3) |
| Segment VII | 2 (3.2) |
| Segment VIII | 14 (22.6) |
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
Tumor Types of 45 Patients Treated by Irreversible Electroporation of Malignant Liver Tumors
| Diagnosis | Number of Patients | Number of Treated Lesions |
|---|---|---|
| Primary liver tumors | ||
| HCC | 23 | 30 |
| CCC | 4 | 4 |
| Metastasis of | ||
| Colorectal tumor | 12 | 20 |
| Mammarian carcinoma | 3 | 5 |
| Others* | 3 | 3 |
| |
Notes: *Carcinoma of unknown origin, choroidal melanoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Abbreviations: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; CCC, cholangiocellular carcinoma.
Number and Types of Biliary Alterations During the First 3 Months After IRE
| Day 1–3 | 6 Weeks | 3 Months | Alterations (Total) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alterations | Alterations | Alterations | ||||||
| Number | Number | New | Resolved | Number | New | Resolved | ||
| Dilatation | 14 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 |
| Narrowing | 16 | 9 | 3 | 10 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 22 |
| Biloma | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 38 | ||||||||
Abbreviation: IRE, irreversible electroporation.
Types and Numbers of Bile Ducts Adjacent to the Ablation Zone and Number of Bile Ducts with Alterations with Regard to Their Localization
| Bile Duct | Total Number of Bile Ducts/Number of Bile Ducts with Alterations | Number of Bile Ducts Adjacent to the Ablation Zone/Number of Bile Ducts with Alterations | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Encased/Altered | Abutting/Altered | Within a Radius of 0.1–1.0 cm/Altered | ||
| Major bile ducts | 12/4 | 4/1 | 6/2 | 2/1 |
| Minor bile ducts | 68/34 | 55/28 | 10/5 | 3/1 |
| Total | 80/38 | 59/29 | 16/7 | 5/2 |
Results of Binary Logistic Regression Model Predicting Biliary Alterations
| Variable | OR (95% CI) | P value |
|---|---|---|
| Age: <65y vs ≥65y | 3.76 (0.83–17.04) | 0.086 |
| Sex: female vs male | 1.24 (0.25–6.16) | 0.794 |
| Nature of bile ducts: minor vs major | 2.70 (0.32–22.69) | 0.360 |
| Liver cirrhosis | 5.83 (0.93–36.70) | 0.060 |
| Number of IRE electrodes: ≤4 vs >4 | 1.35 (0.27–6.84) | 0.719 |
| Bile duct location: abutting or distant vs encased | 1.01 (0.20–5.07) | 0.987 |
| Tumor type: primary vs secondary hepatic malignancy | 6.15 (0.84–44.84) | 0.073 |
| Ablation volume: ≤60 mL vs >60 mL | 0.74 (0.20–2.74) | 0.648 |
| Presence of hepatic stents or metallic implants | 0.59 (0.15–2.39) | 0.460 |
| Distance needle to bile duct: ≤0.3 cm vs >0.3 cm | 0.70 (0.19–2.61) | 0.592 |
Abbreviations: IRE, irreversible electroporation; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Results of Binary Logistic Regression Model Predicting Postinterventional Elevated Values of Alkaline Phosphatase or Serum Bilirubin
| Variable | OR (95% CI) | P value |
|---|---|---|
| Ablation volume: ≤60 mL vs >60 mL | 0.19 (0.32–1.08) | 0.061 |
| Tumor volume: ≤1.8 mL vs >1.8 mL | 2.36 (0.52–10.63) | 0.264 |
Abbreviations: IRE, irreversible electroporation; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Evolution of Laboratory Values During the First 3 Months After IRE in 53 Ablation Procedures
| Preinterventional | Day 1–3 | 6 Weeks | 3 Months | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Increased | Normal | Increased | Normal | Increased | Normal | Increased | |
| Bilirubin | 46 | 7 | 22 | 31 | 38 | 15 | 43 | 10 |
| Alkaline phosphatase | 38 | 15 | 33 | 20 | 30 | 23 | 34 | 19 |
Notes: Standard value of alkaline phosphatase: 45–117 U/L; Standard value of bilirubin: 0.2–1.0 mg/dL.
Abbreviation: IRE, irreversible electroporation.
Figure 1An 80-year-old woman with a centrally located HCC. (A) Coronal contrast-enhanced T1 vibe 3d fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging, conducted preinterventionally during the hepatobiliary phase, shows a centrally located HCC (white arrow) and a left major bile duct without any relevant narrowing (red arrow). (B) One day after IRE, coronal contrast-enhanced T1 vibe 3d fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging, conducted during the hepatobiliary phase, shows a hypointense ablation defect (white arrow) and a newly occurred narrowing of the left major bile duct (red arrow).
Figure 2A 67-year-old man with a centrally located HCC. (A) Axial contrast-enhanced T1 vibe 3d fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging, conducted preinterventionally during the hepatobiliary phase, shows a centrally located HCC (white arrow) and a major bile duct without any dilatation (red arrow). (B) One day after IRE, axial contrast-enhanced T1 vibe 3d fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging, conducted during the hepatobiliary phase, shows a slightly grown, hypointense ablation defect (white arrow) and a newly occurred mild dilatation of the major bile duct (red arrow).