Literature DB >> 32982423

Digital Image Analysis of CD8+ and CD3+ Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Yenlin Huang1,2, Chieh Lin3, Huang-Kai Kao2,4, Shao-Yu Hung4, Hung-Ju Ko2, Yu-Chen Huang5, Yu-Liang Chang5, Kai-Ping Chang2,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The presence of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been reported to be associated with treatment outcomes in many types of solid tumors. However, the results vary due to the various methods of visual estimation and subjective interpretation. The current study is the first to use digital image analyses to evaluate the density of CD8+/CD3+ TILs in tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2005 to 2015, a cohort of 258 TSCC patients were consecutively enrolled in this study. After immunohistochemistry on representative sections, the density of CD8+/CD3+ TILs at tumor invasive margins was evaluated by digital image analysis. The subjects were stratified by the median values of CD3+ cell density, CD8+ cell density, CD8/CD3, and scores (0, 1, and 2) to demonstrate the association with various clinicopathological manifestations.
RESULTS: Low CD8+ TIL counts were associated with advanced tumor stages (p=0.034), and low CD8/CD3 ratios were associated with perineural invasion (p=0.043). Both parameters were also associated with increased tumor depths (p=0.034 and 0.004, respectively). Univariate analyses revealed that advanced tumor stages, perineural invasion, extranodal extension, tumor depth, lower CD8 counts, and lower scores (score 0 vs 2) were associated with poorer overall survival, and multivariate analysis further indicated that extranodal extension and low scores (score 0 vs 2) were both independent factors for overall survival (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0369, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The use of digital image analysis to assess CD8+ TILs at the invasive margins provides an objective indicator of prognoses including overall survival.
© 2020 Huang et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SCC; TIL; oral cancer; oral cavity; squamous cell carcinoma; tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte

Year:  2020        PMID: 32982423      PMCID: PMC7490039          DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S255816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Manag Res        ISSN: 1179-1322            Impact factor:   3.989


Introduction

Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a key cause of mortality in patients with head and neck cancer worldwide and the fifth most common type of cancer among males in Taiwan.1 Furthermore, tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) is the most common malignancy in the oral cavity worldwide.1–3 The 5-year overall survival (OS) for TSCC remains 50~60% in spite of aggressive multimodal treatments including radical surgery, concurrent chemoradiotherapy and/or adjuvant chemotherapy.4 Several previous studies have attempted to predict the OS of OSCC patients by evaluating the density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in OSCC tumors in various parts of the oral cavity:5–8 However, the heterogeneous anatomic location of OSCC and the lack of consistent evaluation methods has delayed the generation of a solid conclusion. Among the different subsets of leukocytes that play distinct roles in the tumor microenvironment, CD8+ TILs have been shown to play a major role in antitumor immunity by releasing cytotoxic granules containing perforin, granulysin and granzymes to eliminate the encountered tumor cells, and a higher number of CD8+ TILs have been noted to be associated with better prognosis in several types of cancer, including breast, colorectal, and head and neck cancer.6–11 Lee et al used cytokeratin immunohistochemistry to separate the epithelial from the stromal compartment in tissue microarrays from 91 patients (corresponding to 182 samples).12 The authors found that high infiltrating CD8+ TILs (that is, in the epithelial compartment) were associated with an inferior survival status in patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. The authors hypothesized that radiotherapy might alter the tumor microenvironment. Additionally, previous studies had several limitations. First, the association of CD8+ TILs with clinicopathological features and their clinical impacts on OS might vary due to the heterogeneity of the tumor location in the oral cavity. Second, manual methods of evaluating the density of CD8+ TILs in the tumor microenvironment might lead to inconsistent intra- and interobserver reproducibility. Although one study investigated the role of CD8+ TILs in TSCC tumors,5 it was limited by a small number of patients and a manual method to enumerate CD8+ TILs. To the best of our knowledge, no application of digital image analysis for studying the role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in a large cohort of TSCC cases has been reported. The aim of this study was to use digital image analyses to quantify the density of CD3+ and CD8+ TILs by examining the invasive margins in a large cohort of TSCC patients. The density of CD3+ and CD8+ TILs in histopathological examination was stratified by the median values of CD3+ and CD8+ TILs based on the density (TILs/mm2). The association of the CD8 to CD3 ratio with clinicopathological factors and survival was further analyzed to demonstrate the potential roles of CD8+ and CD3+ TILs in TSCC tumors and patients.

Patients and Methods

Patient Characteristics and Clinical Specimens

In this study, we retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients with TSCC who were diagnosed at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between September 2005 and December 2015. The patients were defined as betel nut chewers if they chewed 2 or more betel nuts daily for at least 1 year, as cigarette smokers if they smoked every day for at least 1 year, and as alcohol drinkers if they consumed an alcoholic beverage 1 or more times per week for at least 6 months. Patients with at least one of the following conditions were considered ineligible for study inclusion: other concomitant primary cancer (synchronous or metachronous), recurrent disease, any prior history of malignancy, or treatment with neoadjuvant therapy. This study was approved by the institutional review board. The patients underwent standard preoperative work-ups per institutional guidelines, including a detailed medical history, complete physical examination, blood tests, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans of the head and neck, chest radiographs, bone scan, and abdominal ultrasound. The primary tumors were excised with adequate margins using intraoperative frozen section controls transorally or via lip splitting with a mandibular swing approach, and neck dissections were simultaneously performed in level I–III (for clinical N0 neck disease) or level I–V (for clinical N+ disease). Surgical defects were primarily closed or immediately reconstructed, if necessary, by plastic surgeons using local, pedicled, or free flaps. Following surgical treatment, the pathological TNM classification of all tumors was established according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual (2010). Patients with stage pT4 tumors, pathologically positive lymph nodes, or microscopic close margins (<5 mm) were administered adjuvant radiotherapy, and concurrent chemoradiation therapy was administered to patients with extranodal extension, positive surgical margins, or multiple positive lymph node metastases. The chemotherapy was a cisplatin-based regimen, and the total radiation dose for radiotherapy was usually ~70 Gy. The prescribed dose was delivered 2 Gy per day and 5 days per week. After discharge, all patients underwent regular follow-up visits every 2 months for the first year, every 3 months for the second year, and every 6 months thereafter.4

Immunohistochemistry and Digital Image Analysis

Hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained slides were obtained from the archives of the Department of Anatomic Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Taoyuan, Taiwan). The invasive margin was defined as a region centered on the border separating the host tissue from the tumor cells, with an extent of 1 mm.13 An automatic slide scanner was unfortunately not available at the time of conducting this study; therefore, four representative fields (region of interest, ROI, corresponding to 0.58 mm2) in each section were selected at 200x magnification per field after an initial screen under a microscope at low power (40x). The representative images photographed at low magnification (20x) are shown in Figure 1. The corresponding sections were cut at 3 μm thickness and incubated with mouse anti-human monoclonal CD3 (1:100; Novocastra LN10, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and CD8 (1:100; Novocastra 4B11, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) antibodies using a Leica BOND-MAX autostainer (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Isotype-matched mouse monoclonal antibodies were used as negative controls.
Figure 1

(A–D) The invasive margin of two representative cases of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. (hematoxylin and eosin stain; 20x (A, B) and 200x (C, D) original magnification). (E–H) A case example of the tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) counting strategy. Examples of images from the same region of interest under 200x magnification from used to extract total positive staining counts in Image Pro. The total TIL counts were calculated based on the transfer of data from CD3 and CD8 IHC images to black-and-white grid format. (E, CD3 IHC image; F, CD3 Image-Pro image; G, CD8 IHC image, H, CD8 Image-Pro image; 200x original magnification).

(A–D) The invasive margin of two representative cases of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. (hematoxylin and eosin stain; 20x (A, B) and 200x (C, D) original magnification). (E–H) A case example of the tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) counting strategy. Examples of images from the same region of interest under 200x magnification from used to extract total positive staining counts in Image Pro. The total TIL counts were calculated based on the transfer of data from CD3 and CD8 IHC images to black-and-white grid format. (E, CD3 IHC image; F, CD3 Image-Pro image; G, CD8 IHC image, H, CD8 Image-Pro image; 200x original magnification). Images were captured in four different areas with the highest densities of CD3+ and CD8+ cells along the invasive margin under 200X magnification, equivalent to 0.58 mm2 with a 22-mm field of ocular view. The ROI images were captured under the Olympus BX50 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The numbers of CD3 + and CD8 + TILs were identified using ImagePro software and then averaged for each slide. The results are shown as the mean number per mm2 (Figure 1E–H). The densities of CD3+ and CD8+ cells (number of positive cells per mm2) were analyzed using Image-Pro Premier 9.1 (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA).

Statistical Analysis

Chi-square and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare the clinicopathological characteristics in TSCC patients. All patients underwent follow-up evaluations at our outpatient clinic until June 2018 or death. Survival analyses were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were evaluated using the Log rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were employed to define the independent factors for OS. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (version 9.3; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The statistical significance of all p-values was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Patient Characteristics and Clinicopathological Data

During the study period, 258 patients consisting of 222 (86.0%) males and 36 (14.0%) females were enrolled. Of the enrolled patients, 73.3% were smokers, 62.8% were alcohol consumers, and 73.6% were betel nut chewers. The patient age at diagnosis ranged from 21.9 to 83.9 years old (mean, 52.7 ± 11.8); CD3+ cell density ranged from 309.4 to 4594.8/mm2 (mean, 2059.0 ± 868.7); CD8+ cell density ranged from 151.7 to 3491.3/mm2 (mean, 1253.8 ± 693.3); and the CD8 to CD3 ratio ranged from 0.16 to 1.02 (mean, 0.59 ± 0.16). The most common TNM stage was IV (34.5%), followed by II (24.8%), I (24%) and III (16.7%). All patient characteristics are described in Table 1. Dichotomization of the patients by CD3+ cell density, CD8+ cell density and the CD8 to CD3 ratio was performed using the median values as cut-offs, which were 2016/mm2 for CD3+ cell density, 1125/mm2 for CD8+ cell density and 0.592 for CD8/CD3.
Table 1

Clinical, Pathological, and Laboratory Characteristics of Patients

CharacteristicsNumberPercentage, %
Sex
 Male22286.0
 Female3614.0
pT classification
 T17027.1
 T210239.5
 T32911.3
 T45722.1
pN classification
 N016564.0
 N13312.8
 N26023.2
Overall pathological stage
 I6224.0
 II6424.8
 III4316.7
 IV8934.5
Alcohol consumption
 No9637.2
 Yes16262.8
Betel nut chewing
 No6826.4
 Yes19073.6
Smoking
 No6926.7
 Yes18973.3
CharacteristicsNumberMean ± SD (Max, Min)
Age (years)25852.7 ± 11.8 (83.9, 21.9)
CD3 (/mm2)2582059.0 ± 868.7 (4594.8, 309.4)
CD8 (/mm2)2581253.8 ± 693.3 (3491.3, 151.7)
CD8/CD32580.59 ± 0.16 (1.02, 0.16)
Clinical, Pathological, and Laboratory Characteristics of Patients

Association of Clinicopathological Manifestations with CD3+ TILs, CD8+ TILs, CD8/CD3, and Scores

The subjects were stratified by the median values of CD3+ cell density, CD8+ cell density, CD8/CD3, and scores (0, 1, and 2) to demonstrate the association with various clinicopathological manifestations. Cases with CD8+ cell counts and CD8/CD3 ratio lower than the median values were given a score of 0, and cases with CD8+ cell counts and CD8/CD3 ratio higher than the median values were given a score of 2. The related details are shown in Table 2. Decreased CD8+ cell density and CD8/CD3 values were associated with a higher pT classification (p = 0.034 and 0.043, respectively) and positive perineural invasion (p = 0.449 and 0.043, respectively). More interestingly, lower CD8+ cell densities, CD8/CD3 values and scores were associated with increased tumor depths (p = 0.034, 0.004, and 0.018, respectively). These results indicate that lower CD8+ cell densities, CD8/CD3 values and scores may be related to more aggressive TSCC tumors in this retrospective cohort.
Table 2

Associations of CD3+ Cell Density, CD8+ Cell Density, CD8/CD3 and Scores with Clinicopathological Characteristics

CharacteristicsCD3CD8CD8/CD3Score
>2016/mm2a≤2016/mm2aP-values>1125/mm2a≤1125/mm2aP-values>0.592a≤0.592aP-values012P-values
n= 129n=129n= 129n= 129n= 129n=129n= 92n=74n=92
Age (years)b52.2 ± 11.9 (83.9, 28.5)53.2 ± 11.7 (83.6, 21.9)0.474652.6 ± 11.6 (83.9, 28.5)52.8 ± 12.0 (83.6, 21.9)0.919654.2 ± 12.6 (83.9, 21.9)51.1 ± 10.7 (83.6, 28.5)0.0409c52.2 ± 10.7 (83.6, 29.9)51.4 ± 13.1 (82.6, 21.9)54.2 ± 11.7 (83.9, 29.5)0.2541
Sex
 Male1141080.28101091130.47231071150.15068166750.2889
 Female15212016221411817
pT classification
 1–293790.064594780.0346c89830.42815551660.2023
 3–4365035514046372326
pN classification
 (-)82830.896879860.364185800.51686046590.9194
 (+)474650434449322833
Overall pathological stage
 I–II64620.803365610.618367590.31914236480.6755
 III–IV656764686270503844
ENE
 (-)104990.4472104990.4472106970.17136958760.4508
 (+)253025302332231616
Perineural invasion
 No79710.312778720.448983670.0435c4745580.2224
 Yes505851574662452934
Tumor depth (mm) b11.2 ± 9.7 (65.0, 0.0)13.1 ± 12.4 (73.0, 1.0)0.502410.7 ± 9.7 (65.0. 0.0)13.6 ± 12.3 (73.0, 1.0)0.0346c10.6 ± 10.3 (65.0, 0.5)13.7 ± 11.8 (73.0, 0.0)0.0040c14.8 ± 13.1 (73.0, 1.0)11.0 ± 8.3 (35.0, 0.0)10.5 ± 10.6 (65.0, 0.5)0.0184c

Notes: aMedian. bMean ± SD (Maximum, Minimum). cStatistically significant.

Abbreviation: ENE, extranodal extension.

Associations of CD3+ Cell Density, CD8+ Cell Density, CD8/CD3 and Scores with Clinicopathological Characteristics Notes: aMedian. bMean ± SD (Maximum, Minimum). cStatistically significant. Abbreviation: ENE, extranodal extension.

Association of CD3+ TILs, CD8+ TILs, CD8/CD3, and Scores with OS

The mean follow-up period was 4.5 ± 3.2 years, and the survival analyses for the entire cohort of 258 patients demonstrated that the five-year OS was 70.6%. The OS probability analysis revealed the five-year OS incidence for patients in subgroups stratified by overall stages, perineural invasion, extranodal extension, tumor depth (<5 mm or ≥5 mm), CD3+ cell densities, CD8+ cell densities, and the CD8/CD3 ratio (Figure 2). In addition to the significant difference by overall pathological stages, perineural invasion, extranodal extension, and tumor depths, the current study further demonstrated that the OS rates in for patients in subgroups stratified by CD3+ cell densities >2016/mm2 and ≤2016/mm2 were 76.4% and 63.5%, respectively. These differences in OS were not significant based on the Log rank test (p =0.096; Figure 2E). Similarly, the OS probability analysis revealed that the five-year OS rates for patients in subgroups stratified by CD8/CD3 >0.592 and ≤0.592 were 76.5% and 64.5%, respectively. These differences in OS were also not significant (p =0.056; Figure 2G): however, the OS probability analysis revealed that the five-year OS rates for patients in subgroups stratified by CD8+ cell densities >1125/mm2 and ≤1125/mm2 were 77.2% and 62.7%, respectively. These differences in OS were statistically significant (p =0.021; Figure 2F). Likewise, the OS probability analysis revealed that the five-year OS rates for patients in subgroups stratified by scores 2, 1 and 0 were 79.1%, 71.3% and 61.2%, respectively, and these differences were also significant (p =0.034; Figure 2H).
Figure 2

The Kaplan-Meier plots demonstrates the association of (A) overall stage, (B) Perineural invasion, (C) Extranodal extension, (D) Tumor depth, (E) CD3+ tumor-infiltrating leukocytes (TILs), (F) CD8+ TILs, (G) CD8/CD3, and (H) Scores with patient prognoses.

The Kaplan-Meier plots demonstrates the association of (A) overall stage, (B) Perineural invasion, (C) Extranodal extension, (D) Tumor depth, (E) CD3+ tumor-infiltrating leukocytes (TILs), (F) CD8+ TILs, (G) CD8/CD3, and (H) Scores with patient prognoses. A Cox proportional hazards model was also used to evaluate the association of the studied parameters and various clinicopathological factors with OS. When using the CD3 counts, the CD8 counts, and the CD8/CD3 ratio as the continuous variables, univariate analysis demonstrated that the hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] was 1.00 [0.999–1.000] (p =0.040), 1.00 [0.999–1.000] (p =0.037), and 0.859 [0.206–3.575] (p =0.834), respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that more advanced overall stages, perineural invasion, extranodal extension, tumor depth (>5 mm), lower CD8 counts, and lower scores (score 0 vs 2) indicated poorer OS (Table 3). To validate the independent prognostic factors, we performed a multivariate analysis that consisted of all the risk factors listed in the current AJCC staging as well as perineural invasion, which has long been regarded as a risk factor for locoregional recurrence and poorer survival. The results indicated that extranodal extension and lower scores (score 0 vs 2) were both independent factors associated with OS (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0369, respectively; Table 3).
Table 3

Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Overall Survival in Patients with Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Treatment

VariablesUnivariateMultivariate
Hazard Ratio95% CIP-valueHazard Ratio95% CIP-value
Age (years)1.0020.984–1.0200.84451.0110.990–1.0330.2933
Sex
 MaleReferenceReference
 Female0.8340.430–1.6190.59211.0330.514–2.0760.9279
Overall pathological stage
 I–IIReferenceReference
 III–IV5.4493.145–9.440<0.0001b2.5721.321–5.0070.0054
Perineural invasion
 NoReference
 Yes1.9261.453–2.553<0.0001b
ENE
 (-)ReferenceReference
 (+)5.9523.799–9.325<0.0001b3.0841.827–5.206<0.0001b
Tumor depth (mm)
 ≤5 mmaReferenceReference
 >5 mma5.4602.206–13.5130.0002b2.3320.872–6.2340.0916
CD3
 <2016/mm2aReference
 >2016/mm2a0.6900.444–1.0710.0980
CD8
 <1125/mm2aReference
 >1125/mm2a0.5970.383–0.9300.0227b
CD8/CD3
 <0.592aReference
 >0.592a0.6520.419–1.0150.0580
Score
 2ReferenceReference
 10.6570.388–1.1110.11740.7180.420–1.2290.2270
 00.5120.301–0.8710.0135b0.5590.324–0.9650.0369b

Notes: aMedian. bStatistically significant

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ENE, extranodal extension.

Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Overall Survival in Patients with Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Treatment Notes: aMedian. bStatistically significant Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ENE, extranodal extension.

Discussion

T cells mediate cellular immunity and are categorized into CD4+ helper T cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, with the latter releasing cytotoxic granules to kill tumor cells.14 The role of TILs has been studied in melanoma for decades, but its prognostic importance was only recently emphasized in colorectal cancer.15,16 Galon et al quantified the densities of CD8+ and CD3+ TILs at both the invasive margin and tumor center in whole sections of colorectal cancer tumor tissue slides and found that the extent of CD8+ and CD3+ TILs at the tumor center and invasive margin was more predictive of clinical outcome than traditional TNM staging.17 In addition to colorectal cancer, extensive tumor lymphocyte infiltration is also associated with better overall survival and disease-free survival in non-small cell lung cancer.9 The total CD8+ cell count was also associated with improved cancer-specific survival in 1344 breast cancer patients:10 however, in head and neck cancer, a standardized method to evaluate tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is still lacking. Here, digital image analysis was used for the first time to evaluate CD3+/CD8+ TILs at tumor invasive margins in a large homogeneous cohort of TSCC patients. The results showed that the CD8+ TIL density was significantly associated with more aggressive phenotypes and OS. The spatial distribution of TILs can be divided into those in the tumor (epithelial component, intratumoral) or in the stroma (stromal component). Prior studies usually divide the TILs into these two components and many have focused on the intratumoral (epithelial) component. The stromal component has not been clearly defined in the literature and may or may not consist of the invasive margin, which may underlie the inconsistent conclusions on the TIL component that plays a more important role regarding patient survival. The role of TILs at the invasive margin has been rarely studied in the setting of head and neck cancers. The importance of the invasive margin has already been emphasized in other types of cancer, for example in colorectal cancer.11 In addition, the risk model proposed by Brandwein-Gensler et al consists of perineural invasion, lymphocytic host response, and a worse pattern of invasion.18 The latter two parameters actually represent the evaluation of the invasive margin. We hypothesize that the invasive margin is the site where TILs mostly interact with the tumor cells for TSCC and other types of cancer as well. In addition, previous studies did not conclude whether epithelial or stromal CD8+ TILs are a better predictor associated with the survival of OSCC patients. Therefore, we focused on the role of TILs at the invasive margin in our large, homogeneous population. Prior studies have demonstrated that TILs in different compartments are associated with patient prognosis and/or treatment outcomes in OSCC. Distel et al found that in the low-risk group, higher numbers of intraepithelial CD8+ TILs were associated with better survival.19 Oguejiofor et al found that the stromal infiltration of CD8+ TILs was associated with improved outcomes in HPV-related oropharyngeal SCC.20 More recently, another study demonstrated that a high density of CD8+ TILs in the tumor center (probably representing the intratumoral TILs) was associated with increased OS in OSCC.21 Lechner et al investigated TILs in both the tumor centers and invasive margins, but little information was provided in their results regarding the spatial distribution and prognosis.22 Poropatich et al reported that a subset of cases (HPV-positive) displayed a unique TIL pattern consisting of a circumferential peritumoral population of T cells, which was absent in the HPV-negative cases in 40 oral tongue and oropharyngeal cancer patients.23 In breast cancer, TILs also contribute to patient response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Khoury et al found that intratumoral TILs were an independent prognosticator of a pathological complete response in the luminal type of breast cancer, while both intratumoral and stromal TILs were independent predictors of a pathological complete response in triple negative breast cancer.24 The conflicting results may be due to the following: (1) the studied populations were not homogeneous, ranging from HPV-related oropharyngeal cancers to oral cancers that probably includes oral tongue, base of the tongue, gingiva, and buccal mucosa; (2) the definition of the stromal and epithelial compartments was not clear. The epithelial compartment might be defined as TILs infiltrating in the tumor, but the TILs in the stromal compartment include all the TILs distributed from micrometers to millimeters away from the tumor; and (3) the number of patients included in each study differed, ranging from tens to hundreds of patients. The definition of the epithelial and stromal compartment of TILs differed among previous studies, and the TILs in the invasive margin of OSCC were only studied by Lechner et al and Zhou et al with relatively small numbers of patients.21,22 Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the association of TILs at the invasive margins in a large, homogeneous population of TSCC. Based on our preliminary observation, in OSCC, tumor-infiltrating immune cells were more likely to be concentrated at the invasive margins than at the tumor centers. Thus, in the current study, we did not follow the methods used by previous studies to measure the TILs in the tumor cores.17 The current study demonstrated the superiority of evaluating TILs at the invasive margins to those at the tumor centers. The results showed that lower CD8+ cell counts and CD8 to CD3 ratio at the invasive margins were associated with increased tumor depths in TSCC. These findings might be explained by the cytotoxic activity of CD8+ TILs at the invasive margin, which could impede the growth of tumor cells and hence enhance antitumor immunity in the microenvironment. Similarly, in a previous study of malignant melanoma, TIL measurements revealed that the presence of sparse TILs and tumor thickness were significant and independent predictive histologic factors for prognosis.25 Several publications have discussed the prognostic role of TILs in OSCC. Fang et al found that a higher CD8 and CD57 expression in TILs in the tumor stroma was correlated with longer OS in 78 patients with oral cavity cancer.6 Cho et al evaluated the intratumoral and peritumoral densities of CD4+/CD8+ TILs, PD-L1 expression in tumor cells, and tumor-associated fibroblasts in 45 OSCC patients and found that peritumoral TILs were significantly associated with tumor size, lymph node metastasis and clinical stage.26 Shimizu et al evaluated the density of CD8+ TILs in five compartments of 193 OSCC patients and found that a high stromal CD8+ TIL density at the tumor periphery and high parenchymal CD8+ TIL density at the invading edge were independent prognostic markers for recurrence-free survival and OS.7 Wolf et al evaluated different subsets of tumor-infiltrating immune cells, including CD8+ TILs, in 39 OSCC patients and found that CD68+ tumor-associated macrophages rather than CD8+ TILs were associated with poorer overall survival, demonstrating conflicting results with other studies.5–8 Additionally, most previous studies evaluated TIL densities by subjective measurement under microscopy with various fields of interest within OSCC specimens. In our investigation, we identified two main obstacles that can reduce the reliability and reproducibility of the visual assessment of TIL counts under microscopy. First, at the invasive margin, TILs tend to form aggregates, making it difficult to accurately determine the actual numbers of CD8+ TILs. Second, the staining intensities of CD3 and CD8 are usually homogeneous and strong, and thus a weaker and heterogeneous staining pattern could be neglected. To overcome these potential biases in the current study, we adopted digital image analysis at the invasive margins of TSCC tumors and found that this method was more objective and efficient in assessing the density of TILs at invasive margins. OSCCs consist of tumors originating from the buccal mucosa, gingiva, hard palate, retromolar, floor of mouth, and tongue. Previous studies enrolled patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma from various sublocations.6–8 In addition to tumors in the tongue, tumors originating from other sublocations might encroach upon physical barriers, such as skin or bone. These physical barriers might impede the growth of tumor cells and therefore lead to an underestimation of the density of TILs at the invasive front. To achieve a more subjective and scientific evaluation, the current study only enrolled TSCC patients to investigate the effect of CD8+ TILs at the invasive margin on clinicopathological features and survival.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the association of CD8+ and CD3+ TILs with overall survival and tumor depth in a large homogeneous cohort of TSCC patients using a digital image analysis method. Along with extranodal extension, a low abundance of CD8+ and CD3+ TILs predicted a shorter OS in TSCC. Together, the results emphasize the importance of CD8+ TILs in the prognosis of TSCC, and the application of simple immunohistochemistry combined with digital image analysis to provide a novel parameter to supplement current TNM staging for TSCC patient stratification.
  25 in total

1.  Prognostic Significance of Stromal Versus Intratumoral Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Different Subtypes of Breast Cancer Treated With Cytotoxic Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Thaer Khoury; Vidya Nagrale; Mateusz Opyrchal; Xuan Peng; Dan Wang; Song Yao
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2018-09

2.  Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes predict clinical outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Sahar M A Mahmoud; Emma Claire Paish; Desmond G Powe; R Douglas Macmillan; Matthew J Grainge; Andrew H S Lee; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Tumor thickness and lymphocytic infiltration in malignant melanoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  M G Hansen; A B McCarten
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Density and location of CD3+ and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes correlate with prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Chen Zhou; Yaping Wu; Lei Jiang; Zhongwu Li; Pengfei Diao; Dongmiao Wang; Wei Zhang; Laikui Liu; Yanling Wang; Hongbing Jiang; Jie Cheng; Jianrong Yang
Journal:  J Oral Pathol Med       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.253

Review 5.  Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy.

Authors:  Mikhail Binnewies; Edward W Roberts; Kelly Kersten; Vincent Chan; Douglas F Fearon; Miriam Merad; Lisa M Coussens; Dmitry I Gabrilovich; Suzanne Ostrand-Rosenberg; Catherine C Hedrick; Robert H Vonderheide; Mikael J Pittet; Rakesh K Jain; Weiping Zou; T Kevin Howcroft; Elisa C Woodhouse; Robert A Weinberg; Matthew F Krummel
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Combined-modality treatment for advanced oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kang-Hsing Fan; Chen-Yu Lin; Chung-Jan Kang; Shiang-Fu Huang; Hung-Ming Wang; Eric Yen-Chao Chen; I-How Chen; Chun-Ta Liao; Ann-Joy Cheng; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes in squamous cell carcinoma of the oro- and hypopharynx: prognostic impact may depend on type of treatment and stage of disease.

Authors:  Luitpold V Distel; Rainer Fickenscher; Katrin Dietel; Alexander Hung; Heiner Iro; Johannes Zenk; Emeka Nkenke; Maike Büttner; Gerald Niedobitek; Gerhard G Grabenbauer
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 8.  Implications of the tumor immune microenvironment for staging and therapeutics.

Authors:  Janis M Taube; Jérôme Galon; Lynette M Sholl; Scott J Rodig; Tricia R Cottrell; Nicolas A Giraldo; Alexander S Baras; Sanjay S Patel; Robert A Anders; David L Rimm; Ashley Cimino-Mathews
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with operable tongue cancer.

Authors:  Wan-Yu Chen; Chen-Tu Wu; Chun-Wei Wang; Keng-Hsueh Lan; Hsiang-Kuang Liang; Bing-Shen Huang; Yih-Leong Chang; Sung-Hsin Kuo; Ann-Lii Cheng
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Computer-assisted image analysis of the tumor microenvironment on an oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma tissue microarray.

Authors:  Sangjune Laurence Lee; Michael Cabanero; Martin Hyrcza; Marcus Butler; Fei-Fei Liu; Aaron Hansen; Shao Hui Huang; Ming-Sound Tsao; Yuyao Song; Lin Lu; Wei Xu; Douglas B Chepeha; David P Goldstein; Ilan Weinreb; Scott V Bratman
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-05-18
View more
  6 in total

1.  Histologic evaluation of host immune microenvironment and its prognostic significance in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a comparative study on lymphocytic host response (LHR) and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs).

Authors:  Bin Xu; Abeer M Salama; Cristina Valero; Avery Yuan; Anjanie Khimraj; Maelle Saliba; Daniella K Zanoni; Ian Ganly; Ronald Ghossein; Snehal G Patel; Nora Katabi
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.309

2.  Soluble Sema4D in Plasma of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Is Associated With Underlying Non-Inflamed Tumor Profile.

Authors:  Rania H Younis; Ioana Ghita; Manar Elnaggar; Risa Chaisuparat; Vasileios Ionas Theofilou; Donita Dyalram; Robert A Ord; Eduardo Davila; Luke J Tallon; John C Papadimitriou; Tonya J Webb; Søren M Bentzen; Joshua E Lubek
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  The association between CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and the clinical outcome of cancer immunotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Li; Caichen Li; Xiuyu Cai; Zhanhong Xie; Liquan Zhou; Bo Cheng; Ran Zhong; Shan Xiong; Jianfu Li; Zhuxing Chen; Ziwen Yu; Jianxing He; Wenhua Liang
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-09-16

4.  Worst Pattern of Perineural Invasion Redefines the Spatial Localization of Nerves in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yong Fu; Xinwen Zhang; Zhuang Ding; Nisha Zhu; Yuxian Song; Xiaoxin Zhang; Yue Jing; Yijun Yu; Xiaofeng Huang; Lei Zhang; Qingang Hu; Yanhong Ni; Liang Ding
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  FOXM1 Inhibition Enhances the Therapeutic Outcome of Lung Cancer Immunotherapy by Modulating PD-L1 Expression and Cell Proliferation.

Authors:  Hamadi Madhi; Jeon-Soo Lee; Young Eun Choi; Yan Li; Myoung Hee Kim; Yongdoo Choi; Sung-Ho Goh
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 17.521

Review 6.  Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Head and Neck Cancer: Ready for Prime Time?

Authors:  Alhadi Almangush; Stijn De Keukeleire; Sylvie Rottey; Liesbeth Ferdinande; Tijl Vermassen; Ilmo Leivo; Antti A Mäkitie
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.