Takahisa Yamashita1,2, Claudia Vollbrecht1,3,4, Burkhard Hirsch1, Karsten Kleo1, Ioannis Anagnostopoulos1, Michael Hummel1. 1. Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany. 2. Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan. 3. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany. 4. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
MYC is a transcriptional factor that regulates growth and proliferation through cell cycle pathways. MYC alterations, in particular MYC rearrangements, are important in assessing the prognosis of aggressive B-cell lymphoma. In this study, we focused on the impact of nine major cell cycle genes for MYC-driven aggressive mature B-cell lymphoma and analyzed the mutational status using targeted next generation sequencing. Our 40 cases of aggressive mature B-cell lymphomas included 5 Burkitt lymphomas, 17 high-grade B-cell lymphomas and 18 diffuse large B-cell lymphomas with MYC breaks in 100%, 88% and 11%, respectively. Our data allowed a molecular classification into four categories partially independent from the histopathological diagnosis but correlating with the Ki-67 labelling index: (I) harboring TP53 and CDKN2A mutations, being highly proliferative, (II) with MYC rearrangement associated with MYC and/or ID3 mutations, being highly proliferative, (III) with MYC rearrangement combined with additional molecular changes, being highly proliferative, and (IV) with a diverse pattern of molecular alterations, being less proliferative. Taken together, we found that mutations of TP53, CDKN2A, MYC and ID3 are associated with highly proliferative B-cell lymphomas that could profit from novel therapeutic strategies.
MYC is a transcriptional factor that regulates growth and proliferation through cell cycle pathways. MYC alterations, in particular MYC rearrangements, are important in assessing the prognosis of aggressive B-cell lymphoma. In this study, we focused on the impact of nine major cell cycle genes for MYC-driven aggressive mature B-cell lymphoma and analyzed the mutational status using targeted next generation sequencing. Our 40 cases of aggressive mature B-cell lymphomas included 5 Burkitt lymphomas, 17 high-grade B-cell lymphomas and 18 diffuse large B-cell lymphomas with MYC breaks in 100%, 88% and 11%, respectively. Our data allowed a molecular classification into four categories partially independent from the histopathological diagnosis but correlating with the Ki-67 labelling index: (I) harboring TP53 and CDKN2A mutations, being highly proliferative, (II) with MYC rearrangement associated with MYC and/or ID3 mutations, being highly proliferative, (III) with MYC rearrangement combined with additional molecular changes, being highly proliferative, and (IV) with a diverse pattern of molecular alterations, being less proliferative. Taken together, we found that mutations of TP53, CDKN2A, MYC and ID3 are associated with highly proliferative B-cell lymphomas that could profit from novel therapeutic strategies.
MYC is a transcriptional factor and proto-oncoprotein that mediates apoptosis,
differentiation and proliferation, deregulation of its gene is detected in 50-70% of all
humanmalignancies., In particular, MYC
rearrangement is often strongly correlated with a poor prognosis in a variety of malignant
hematological tumors and is known not only as a hallmark of Burkitt lymphoma (BL), but also
as a prognostic factor in other aggressive mature B-cell lymphomas such as diffuse large
B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HBL)., HBL
was established as a new disease entity in the current 2017 World Health Organization (WHO)
classification of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissue, and partly replaced the provisional
entity of B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable with features intermediate between DLBCL and BL
(BCL-U) of the previous classification.
The HBL category is further divided into two subtypes: (1) HBL associated with
MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements
[HBL-double hit (DH)/triple hit (TH)], and (2) HBL not otherwise specified (NOS). HBL-DH/TH
harbors chromosomal rearrangements of MYC at the 8q24 locus and
BCL2 at the 18q21 locus, and/or BCL6 at the 3q27 locus.
HBL with MYC/BCL2 rearrangements accounts for most cases of this entity and
has a more dismal prognosis than typical DLBCL., On the
other hand, HBL NOS does not harbor double rearrangements, but approximately 20-35% of these
have isolated MYC rearrangement with or without copy number alteration or
amplification of the BCL2 region. Some cases harbor BCL2
rearrangement with MYC copy number alteration or amplification.- However, the precise definition of HBL NOS is currently
controversial and not well defined. Additionally, the differentiation from DLBCL with
MYC abnormalities or BL and HBL NOS is impeded due to limited knowledge
of the biological background, allowing merely insufficient morphological or
immunophenotypical categorization. Therefore, a more reliable, easily applicable and
accurate method to classify these categories is required. Next generation sequencing (NGS)
of BL has elucidated recurrent somatic mutations in CCND3,
ID3, TCF3 and TP53, which add to the
malignant potential of BL by activating the cell cycle pathway.- Momose et al. reported that recurrent somatic
mutations of CCND3, ID3, TCF3 and
MYC were detected not only in BL, but also in the other MYC-driven
aggressive mature B-cell lymphomas, like HBL and DLBCL with MYC
rearrangement. Furthermore,
inactivating mutations of tumor suppressor genes (e.g. BTG1,
BTG2, CDKN2A, and TP53) mediating cell
cycle arrest were detected in MYC-driven aggressive mature B-cell lymphomas.,-
Recently, many alterations of cell cycle- or apoptosis-genes were detected in approximately
40% of HBL-DH/TH cases. In this context,
it is conceivable that the molecular change in these specific cell cycle genes affects many
MYC-driven aggressive mature B-cell lymphomas. Moreover, the mutational status may allow a
sub-classification into molecular subgroups independent from the histopathological
diagnosis.In this study, we focused on the mutational status of cell cycle genes
(BTG1, BTG2, CCND3,
CDKN2A, ID3, MAX, MYC,
TCF3 and TP53) to gain deeper insights into the
molecular mechanisms of MYC-driven aggressive mature B-cell lymphoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Case selection
We selected 168 cases of aggressive mature B-cell lymphoma diagnosed as BL (n=12),
HBL-DH/TH (n=17), HBL NOS (n=8) and DLBCL NOS (n=131) according to the criteria of the
current WHO classification between 2016 and 2018 diagnosed at the Institute of Pathology
at the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin. These cases were reviewed by two pathologists
(I.A and T.Y). Next, we selected 68 of 168 cases that fulfilled our criteria for
MYC-driven aggressive mature B-cell lymphoma, which were analyzed for not only MYC
expression (≥40%), but also the Ki-67 labeling index (LI) (≥80%). As we used the Ki-67 LI
for case selection, Ki-67 was both a useful prognostic marker and cell cycle-related
cellular marker for cell proliferation in the cases of aggressive lymphoma. Recent studies
reported that overexpression of Ki-67 was a predictor of a dismal prognosis in patients
treated using rituximab.-
Moreover, MYC expression was independent of Ki-67 and mature B-cell lymphomas harboring
high MYC expression did not always have high proliferation rates. Our criteria of MYC-driven aggressive mature B-cell
lymphoma referenced the previous report, which compared the expression of MYC with that of
Ki-67., Finally, we excluded 28 cases, in
particular CD5-positive DLBCL, DLBCL with coexistent or transformed follicular lymphoma
(FL), human immune deficiency virus-related lymphoma, primary central nervous system
lymphoma, and cases mostly exhibiting necrotic tissue or insufficient material for our
analysis (Supplementary figure 1).This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved
by the Ethics Commission of the Charité-Universitätsmedizin (approval number:
EA4/129/15).
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
The following antibodies were used for IHC: anti-CD3 (clone: LN10, dilution: 1:100,
Novocastra, Leica Biosystems, Germany), anti-CD10 (clone: 56C6, dilution: 1:25,
Novocastra, Leica Biosystems), anti-CD20 (clone: L26, dilution: 1:100, DAKO, Agilent-Dako,
USA), anti-BCL2 (clone: 124, dilution: 1:25, Agilent-Dako), anti-BCL6 (clone: PG-B6p,
dilution: 1:25, Agilent-Dako), anti-IRF4 (clone: MUM1p, dilution: 1:25, Agilent-Dako),
anti-MYC (clone: Y69, dilution: 1:300, Epitomics, USA) and anti-Ki-67 (clone: MIB-1,
dilution: 1:200, Agilent-Dako). Immunohistochemical staining was performed using BOND-MAX
(Leica, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Protein expression was
assessed independently by two pathologists (I.A and T.Y) and was categorized into two
groups according to the proportion of expressing cells in several areas of the specimens
by visual examination. The cut-off value for positive expression of each antibody was set
as follows: ≥90% of lymphoma cells stained for CD20, ≥30% of lymphoma cells stained for
CD10, BCL2, BCL6 and IRF4, and ≥40% of lymphoma cells stained for MYC. The definition of
double expressor (DE) lymphoma followed the WHO criteria for MYC expression (≥40%) and
BCL2 expression (≥50%). The percentage of lymphoma cells with Ki-67 nuclear immunostaining
was defined as Ki-67 LI. We separated our cases into 3 groups according to the expression
rate of MYC as follows: M1: 40-59%, M2: 60-79% and M3: 80-100%. A further subdivision was
made according to Ki-67 LI in the following manner: less proliferative K1: 80-94% and
highly proliferative K2: 95-100% because a Ki-67 LI over 95% is one of the criteria for
highly aggressive lymphoma such as BL.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis
The interphase FISH analyses were carried out to detect translocations of
MYC (Vysis LSI MYC-dual color break-apart rearrangement probe, Abbott,
Germany), BCL2 (dual color break-apart probe, DAKO) and
BCL6 (Vysis LSI BCL6-dual color break-apart rearrangement probe,
Abbott). The cut-off levels for positivity were 18%, 7% and 11% for MYC,
BCL2 and BCL6 in the routine diagnostic setting,
respectively. The total counted number of target cells was 50 to 100 cells for the
detection of breaks, and all cases were independently evaluated by two or more
investigators. Initially, we selected 168 cases consisting of 46 cases (27%) of MYC
rearrangement, 39 cases (23%) of BCL2 rearrangement, 43 cases (26%) of BCL6 rearrangement
and 68 cases (40%) without rearrangements (Supplementary figure 1).
Next generation sequencing (NGS) DNA preparation
DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections using
the Maxwell 16 FFPE plus LEV DNA purification kit (Promega, Germany) according to the
manufacturer’s protocol, followed by fluorescence-based quantification using Qubit dsDNA
HS assay kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA).
Design of B-cell lymphoma gene panel
The B-cell lymphoma specific gene panel spans a genomic region of 6.72 kb covering
proportions of the coding regions of nine genes relevant for cell cycle regulation
(BTG1, BTG2, CCND3,
CDKN2A, ID3, MAX,
MYC, TCF3 and TP53) and was
custom-designed using the Ion Ampliseq Designer (Version v7.0.9, Thermo Fisher Scientific)
(Supplementary table 1).
Library preparation, sequencing and data analysis
Amplification of the selected gene regions by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
was performed with 40 ng of DNA input for each primer pool. (Supplementary table 2).
Subsequently, adaptors were ligated following the instructions of NEXTflex DNA Sequencing
Kit for Ion Torrent, Manual V15.12 (Bioo Scientific, USA). Finally, library quality was
analyzed by microfluidic electrophoresis using Fragment Analyzer (Agilent Technologies,
USA) and quantified using Ion Library TaqMan Quantitation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Libraries were sequenced on the Ion S5XL system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Fastq files
were analyzed using the CLC Genomics Workbench, version 5.0.1 (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany)
after alignment, mapping to the hg19 human reference genome and corresponding target
regions as determined in the custom panel bed file. The quality of base scoring and
minimum depth of coverage met the criteria of Q20, which is equal to an error rate of 1%
and a minimum of > 250 reads. The
cut-off value of allele frequency for mutation detection was set to 5% for tissue sample
analysis according to our results of the limit of detection (LoD).
Determining the limit of detection (LoD)
In order to determine the LoD of our NGS assay, DNA from BL cell line Raji with known
mutations (MYC, NP_002458: p.V20A, p.S21T, p.E54D, p.A59V;
TP53, NP_000537: p.R213Q, p.Y234H) was serially diluted to 5%, 20% or
undiluted (100%) with un-mutated tonsil reference DNA, and analyzed in duplicate by NGS as
described above.
Prediction analysis of single nucleotide variants
To investigate the impact of the DNA variants detected in the histological samples on
protein structure/function, we used the web-based tools MutationAssessor (cBio@MSKCC,
release 3), Functional Analysis
through Hidden Markov Model (FATHMM, version 2.3) and Clinical Interpretation of Genetic Variants by the 2015
ACMG-AMP Guidelines (InterVar, version 0.1.7).
RESULTS
Immunohistochemistry and FISH
The majority of cases (28 out of 40; 70%) displayed a germinal center B-cell lymphoma
immunophenotype (GCB) according to the Hans algorithm, whereby 12 cases (30%) were assigned to non-germinal center
B-cells (non-GCB). All HBL cases with the exception of one (16 out of 17; 94%) were also
of the GCB type. Thirty-one (89%) of 35 cases of DLBCL or blastoid morphology (not
including BL) demonstrated co-expression of MYC and BCL2 (DE lymphoma), and were divided
into subgroups according to their percentage of MYC or Ki-67-expressing tumor cells. All
cases of the BL subgroup belonged to M3/K2, whereas a decreasing percentage of HBL cases
(71% M3, 88% K2) and DLBCL cases (61% M3, 56% K2) was assigned to these two subgroups
(Table 1 and Supplementary figure 2). The
detection of chromosomal breaks was performed by FISH for MYC,
BCL2 and BCL6 genes. MYC breaks were
detectable in all 5 cases of BL, 15 out of 17 cases (88%) of HBL and 2 out of 18 cases
(11%) of DLBCL. Correlation with MYC expression demonstrated the presence of
MYC breaks in 50% (1/2) of subgroup M1, 30% (3/10) of subgroup M2 and
64% (18/28) of subgroup M3. BCL6 breaks were detectable in 7 cases of
DLBCL and in 3 cases of HBL; BCL2 breaks were found in 8 cases of HBL and
3 cases of DLBCL. Seventeen HBL cases were classified as HBL-DH, 9 cases as HBL-TH and 8
cases as HBL NOS using a combined evaluation of FISH, and morphological and
immunohistochemical findings (Figure 1).
Table 1
FISH and IHC results
BL
HBL-DH/TH
HBS NOS
DLBCL
Total
Case number
5
9
8
18
40
Hans algorithm
GCB/non-GCB
5/0
9/0
7/1
7/11
28/12
FISH
Rearrangement
MYC
5 (100%)
9 (100%)
6 (75%)
2 (11%)
21 (53%)
BCL2
0 (0%)
8 (89%)
0 (0%)
3 (17%)
11 (28%)
BCL6
0 (0%)
2 (22%)
1 (13%)
7 (39%)
10 (25%)
IHC
MYC
M1 (40-59%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
2 (10%)
2 (5%)
M2 (60-79%)
0 (0%)
3 (33%)
2 (25%)
5 (28%)
10 (25%)
M3 (80-100%)
5 (100%)
6 (67%)
6 (75%)
11 (61%)
28 (70%)
BCL2
0 (0%)
9 (100%)
5 (65%)
17 (94%)
31 (78%)
BCL6
5 (100%)
8 (89%)
7 (88%)
17 (94%)
37 (93%)
CD10
5 (100%)
8 (89%)
6 (75%)
7 (39%)
26 (65%)
IRF4
5 (100%)
2 (22%)
4 (50%)
16 (89%)
27 (68%)
Ki-67
K1 (80-94%)
0 (0%)
2 (22%)
0 (100%)
8 (44%)
10 (25%)
K2 (95-100%)
5 (100%)
7 (78%)
8 (100%)
10 (56%)
30 (75%)
DE lymphoma
Positive
0 (0%)
9 (100%)
5 (63%)
17 (94%)
31 (78%)
FISH: Fluorescence in situ hybridization, IHC: Immunohistochemistry,
BL: Burkitt lymphoma, HBL-DH/TH: high-grade B-cell lymphoma double hit/triple hit, HBL
NOS: high-grade B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified, DLBCL: diffuse large B-cell
lymphoma, GCB: germinal center B-cell lymphoma immunophenotype, DE lymphoma: double
expressor lymphoma
FISH: Fluorescence in situ hybridization, IHC: Immunohistochemistry,
BL: Burkitt lymphoma, HBL-DH/TH: high-grade B-cell lymphoma double hit/triple hit, HBL
NOS: high-grade B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified, DLBCL: diffuse large B-cell
lymphoma, GCB: germinal center B-cell lymphoma immunophenotype, DE lymphoma: double
expressor lymphomaRepresentative FISH results(a) Case 35 (BL) MYC (+)/BCL2
(-)/BCL6 (-), (b) Case 42 (HBL NOS)
MYC (+)/BCL2 (-)/BCL6 (-),
(c) Case14 (HBL-TH) MYC (+)/BCL2
(+)/BCL6 (+). FISH: Fluorescence in situ
hybridization, BL: Burkitt lymphoma, HBL NOS: high-grade B-cell lymphoma, not
otherwise specified, HBL TH: high-grade B-cell lymphoma triple hit.
Targeted next generation sequencing (NGS)
In order to determine the sensitivity of mutation detection and uniformity of the
amplicon distribution, we employed serial dilutions of DNA of BL cell line Raji extracted
from non-diseased human tonsils. The resulting allelic frequencies of mutations, as
exemplified by the MYC and TP53 genes, demonstrated high
correlation with the calculated dilution of cell line DNA ranging from 100% to 5% (Figure 2 and Supplementary table 3). Non-synonymous
mutations determined by NGS of clinical samples consisted of 57 missense mutations, 7
frameshifts and 6 nonsense mutations (Figure 3,
Supplementary table 4). All analyzed cell cycle regulating genes were mutated at varying
frequencies: MYC (number of variants/number of samples: 19/10),
TP53 (11/10), ID3 (8/7), BTG2 (11/5),
BTG1 (5/4), CDKN2A (4/4), TCF3 (3/3),
CCND3 (2/2) and MAX (1/1), respectively. Five variants
were excluded because of non-cancerous change and low impact defined on all predictive
analyses. According to our results, almost all cases were able to be classified
molecularly into four categories (Figure 4). Category
I (12/40 cases) is characterized by the dominance of TP53 and
CDKN2A mutations, which were exclusively found in this subgroup. The
majority of cases belonged to DLBCL (7 cases), and the remaining cases belonged to HBL (3
cases) and BL (2 cases). For example, case 46 (DLBCL) had three mutations in
CDKN2A (p.A148T), BTG1 (p.L37M) and
BTG2 (p.L10F), and no chromosomal rearrangements. BTG1
mutation (p.L37M, MSKCC impact: medium, FATHMM impact: oncogenic/non-cancer associated)
located in the potential phosphorylation site commonly found in aggressive B-cell lymphoma
has a significant function to accelerate the cell cycle. The in silico analysis predicted a functional
impact of the CDKN2A mutation p.A148T (MSKCC impact: medium, FATHMM
impact: neutral/cancer-associated) (Table 2).
Category II (9/40 cases) was dominated by mutations in ID3 and
MYC, and samples harbored MYC translocations in the
majority of cases (7 cases). With the exception of one case, all others belonged to HBL (5
cases) or BL (3 cases). Almost all cases of category III (9 cases) carried
MYC breaks, and 6 cases displayed additional BCL2 (5
cases) or BCL6 (1 case) breaks. Only three of the investigated genes
(BTG2, TCF3 and MAX) were associated
with mutations. Category IV (10 cases) is composed of mainly DLBCL cases; only two cases
belonged to the HBL group. Based on the molecular status, this category is heterogeneous
with few scattered mutations and a predominance of BCL6 breaks.
Categories I, II and III are characterized by a very high proliferation rate (Ki-67 LI:
≥95%) and categories I and II are dominated by a high load of mutations in genes involved
in proliferation control. Interestingly, category III had only few mutations in
proliferation-associated genes despite a high proportion of HBL-DH/TH cases. Taken
together, our approach allows a molecular categorization of MYC-driven aggressive mature
B-cell lymphoma into four groups, which is partially independent from pathological
diagnosis.
Fig. 2
Determining the limit of detection
Sequencing results of serial dilutions of mutated Burkitt lymphoma cell line Raji
with unmutated tonsil DNA. A high correlation of expected and effective variant allele
frequencies was noted, even at tumor cell dilutions down to 5%.
Fig. 3
Summary of non-synonymous variants detected by the B-cell lymphoma specific NGS
panel
(a) Splitting the number of non-synonymous variants by disease
revealed the highest amount for HBL and DLCBL; (b) Number of
non-synonymous detected variants by gene; Most alteration types were missense
mutations (81%), with MYC as the most frequently altered gene (23
variants). NGS: next generation sequencing, HBL: high-grade B-cell lymphoma, DLBCL:
diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Fig. 4
Molecular classification of MYC-driven aggressive mature B-cell lymphoma based on
IHC, FISH and NGS
The block color represents the type of rearrangement and mutational status lined by
expression of MYC and Ki-67. Categories I and II are included in the aggressive type
(K2 group) and Category III (K1 group) is a less aggressive type than the others. IHC:
immunohistochemistry, FISH: fluorescence in situ hybridization, NGS:
next generation sequencing, DLBCL: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Table 2
TP53 and CDKN2A mutations
N
Diag.
Gene
Mut.
Changed
DBD
Func.
MSKCC impact
FATHMMImpact
DNA
amino acid
5
DL
TP53
N
c.586C>T
p.R196
+
LOF
NA
Onco./ Cancer
11
HBS NOS
TP53
M
c.738G>A
p.M246I
+
LOF
Med.
Onco./ Cancer
16
DL
TP53
M
c.818G>A
p.R273H
+
LOF
Med.
Onco./ Cancer
28
HBLDH
TP53
M
c.417G>T c.700T>G
p.K139N p.Y234D
+
LOF LOF
Med.
Onco./ Cancer
32
BL
TP53
M
c.843C>A
p.D281E
+
LOF
Med.
Onco./ Cancer
44
DL
TP53
M
c.413C>T
p.A138V
+
LOF
Med.
Onco./ Cancer
52
DL
TP53
M
c.817C>G
p.R273G
+
LOF
Med.
Onco./ Cancer
58
DL
TP53
M
c.701A>G
p.Y234C
+
LOF
Med.
Onco./ Cancer
62
HBLNOS
TP53
M
c.847C>T
p.R283C
+
LOF
Low
Onco./ Cancer
66
DL
TP53
M
c.542G>C
p.R181P
+
LOF
Med.
Onco./ Cancer
5
DL
CDKN2A
M
c.442G>A
p.A148T
-
LOF?
Med.
Neut./ Cancer
35
BL
CDKN2A
M
c.442G>A
p.A148T
-
LOF?
Med.
Neut./ Cancer
46
DL
CDKN2A
M
c.442G>A
p.A148T
-
LOF?
Med.
Neut./ Cancer
66
DL
CDKN2A
M
c.442G>A
p.A148T
-
LOF?
Med.
Neut./ Cancer
N: case number, Diag: diagnosis, DL: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, HBL NOS:
high-grade B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified, HBL DH: high-grade B-cell lymphoma
double hit, BL: Burkitt lymphoma, Mut: mutational type, N: nonsense mutation, M:
missense mutation, DBD: DNA-binding region, Func: function, LOF: loss of function, NA:
not available, Med: medium impact, Onco: oncogenic impact, Neut: neutral impact,
Cancer: cancer-associated variant
Determining the limit of detectionSequencing results of serial dilutions of mutated Burkitt lymphoma cell line Raji
with unmutated tonsil DNA. A high correlation of expected and effective variant allele
frequencies was noted, even at tumor cell dilutions down to 5%.Summary of non-synonymous variants detected by the B-cell lymphoma specific NGS
panel(a) Splitting the number of non-synonymous variants by disease
revealed the highest amount for HBL and DLCBL; (b) Number of
non-synonymous detected variants by gene; Most alteration types were missense
mutations (81%), with MYC as the most frequently altered gene (23
variants). NGS: next generation sequencing, HBL: high-grade B-cell lymphoma, DLBCL:
diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Molecular classification of MYC-driven aggressive mature B-cell lymphoma based on
IHC, FISH and NGSThe block color represents the type of rearrangement and mutational status lined by
expression of MYC and Ki-67. Categories I and II are included in the aggressive type
(K2 group) and Category III (K1 group) is a less aggressive type than the others. IHC:
immunohistochemistry, FISH: fluorescence in situ hybridization, NGS:
next generation sequencing, DLBCL: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.N: case number, Diag: diagnosis, DL: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, HBL NOS:
high-grade B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified, HBL DH: high-grade B-cell lymphoma
double hit, BL: Burkitt lymphoma, Mut: mutational type, N: nonsense mutation, M:
missense mutation, DBD: DNA-binding region, Func: function, LOF: loss of function, NA:
not available, Med: medium impact, Onco: oncogenic impact, Neut: neutral impact,
Cancer: cancer-associated variant
DISCUSSION
In this study, we examined the mutational status of nine cell cycle genes of
MYC-driven aggressive mature B-cell lymphoma, and identified four
molecular categories according to the combined results of targeted NGS and FISH that
correlated with proliferative activity but only partially with the histopathological
diagnosis. Of note, the highly proliferative types (Categories I and II) demonstrated a high
mutational frequency in the analyzed cell cycle-regulating genes. Category I is mainly based
on the mutations of TP53 and CDKN2A (Table 2). The missense and nonsense mutations of these
tumor suppressor genes are known to be driver mutations and prognostic factors in numerous
tumors, and directly affect cell cycle progression.- In
particular, the DNA-binding site of TP53, which ranges from exon 4 to 9, is
very important for p53 activity and mutations in this region lead to not only
loss-of-function due to their ability to act as dominant-negative function of wild type p53,
but also to a gain-of-function independent of the effects on wild type p53. In our cases, the missense mutations of
this region matched those described in previous reports.,
Moreover, the cases with point mutations in the DNA binding site of TP53 had a significantly
poorer prognosis than those with mutations in the non-DNA binding domain. This is in concordance with our results, as
Category I (highly proliferative) consists of cases with mutations in the
TP53 DNA-binding domain. The other frequent molecular alterations in
Category I are alterations of CDKN2A that encode two cycle-dependent kinase
inhibitors, p16INK4a and p14AR, which directly negatively regulate the cell cycle like
p53. Deletion of this gene is a
prognostic factor in many tumors and
missense mutations of this gene were detected previously in some DLBCL cases. The common CDKN2A
polymorphism p.A148T found in 4 cases was previously described in several cancer types such
as colon-, lung-, breast-, bladder-cancer and melanoma.,
This variant and amino acid change located in exon 2 of CDKN2A and in the
open reading frame of p16INK4a are not directly involved in binding to cyclin kinases, CDK4
or CDK6. Thus, this variant (p.A148T) may not have direct effects on the inhibitor activity,
but the functional impact is unclear. However, previous functional studies suggested that
this alteration (p.A148T) can reduce its ability to inhibit the cell cycle in both melanoma
and acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines.,
Debniak et al. reported that the variant p.A148T may affect the function of
p16INK4a through the CDKN2A promoter.,
Our in silico analysis demonstrated that this alteration induced
cancer-associated ability (MSKCC impact; medium, FATHMM impact; cancer-associated). Taken
together, these mutations of TP53 and CDKN2A may affect
the progression, development and survival of MYC-driven aggressive mature B-cell
lymphoma.The highly proliferative cases of Category II are characterized by MYC
rearrangement with MYC and/or ID3 mutation, and consisted
of 5 HBL cases (63%) and 3 BL cases (37%). Most of the Category II samples had two or more
mutations in all nine cell-cycle associated genes. Both HBL with MYC
mono-rearrangement and BL cases of this category are similar in terms of the mutational
status (MYC, ID3 and CCND3). These
BL-specific mutations may give the aggressive malignant ability not only for BL, but also
for HBL and DLBCL as previously assumed., For
example, case 30 (HBL NOS) displayed not only BL-like morphological features, but also a
BL-like mutational status of MYC (p.E54D, p.S107R, p.G152A),
ID3 (p.V67I, p.E68fs) and CCND3 (p.L292fs), with
MYC rearrangement and, in addition, a strong expression of BCL2 (Figure 5). In particular, both the transactivation domain
(aa position: 12-155) in exon 2 of MYC and loop-helix-loop (HLH) domain (aa
position: 43-80) in exon 1 of ID3 commonly mutated in BL (known as a hot
spot region) and may be important for the pathogenesis of these tumors.,,
Almost all cases of Category III had MYC rearrangements – comparable to
Category II - but additional chromosomal rearrangements are found frequently. The high
proliferative activity of this category is likely supported by the chromosomal
rearrangements and modulated by other molecular changes. Evrard et al.
recently reported that CREBBP mutations - most frequently mutated in
HBL-DH/TH cases - lead not only to accelerated BCL6 activity, but were also
able to suppress p53 function. For this
reason, Category III may be influenced by the other alterations of cell cycle pathway. Taken
together, Categories I, II and III had increased proliferative activity, which is associated
with characteristic molecular alterations. Lastly, 15 (83%) of 18 DLBCL cases were
classified into either Category I (7 cases) or IV (8 cases). Seven cases of 8 DLBCL cases in
Category IV had at least one rearrangement and half had additional alterations
(MYC, BTG1, BTG2 and
TCF3) of cell cycle genes. This suggested that TP53 and
CDKN2A alterations separate Category I (highly proliferative type) from
Category IV (less proliferative type) in MYC-driven DLBCL cases.
Fig. 5
Histopathological findings in HBL NOS
Case 30 (HBL, NOS: Category II) exhibited (a) morphology (H&E
stain) and expression of (b) CD20, (c) CD10,
(d) MYC, and (e) Ki-67 similar to BL, but
(f) with the additional expression of BCL2. HBL NOS: high-grade
B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified.
Histopathological findings in HBL NOSCase 30 (HBL, NOS: Category II) exhibited (a) morphology (H&E
stain) and expression of (b) CD20, (c) CD10,
(d) MYC, and (e) Ki-67 similar to BL, but
(f) with the additional expression of BCL2. HBL NOS: high-grade
B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified.In conclusion, our targeted NGS approach using a gene panel for cell cycle related genes in
conjunction with chromosomal rearrangements was able to identify four molecular categories
of aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Category I based on TP53 and
CDKN2A mutations, Category II based on MYC rearrangement
with MYC and/or ID3 mutation, Category III based on
MYC rearrangement with one additional molecular alteration, and Category
IV based on one rearrangement of BCL2 or BCL6 without
TP53, CDKN2A, ID3 or
MYC mutations. Thus, our study demonstrated, despite the limited number
of cases and lack of clinical information, that alterations in cell cycles genes provide
added value for a more precise sub-classification of highly aggressive B-cell lymphoma.
Consequently, Categories I, II and III having characteristic molecular features and the
highest Ki-67 LI should be further evaluated for novel treatment strategies.
Authors: Julia Richter; Matthias Schlesner; Steve Hoffmann; Markus Kreuz; Ellen Leich; Birgit Burkhardt; Maciej Rosolowski; Ole Ammerpohl; Rabea Wagener; Stephan H Bernhart; Dido Lenze; Monika Szczepanowski; Maren Paulsen; Simone Lipinski; Robert B Russell; Sabine Adam-Klages; Gordana Apic; Alexander Claviez; Dirk Hasenclever; Volker Hovestadt; Nadine Hornig; Jan O Korbel; Dieter Kube; David Langenberger; Chris Lawerenz; Jasmin Lisfeld; Katharina Meyer; Simone Picelli; Jordan Pischimarov; Bernhard Radlwimmer; Tobias Rausch; Marius Rohde; Markus Schilhabel; René Scholtysik; Rainer Spang; Heiko Trautmann; Thorsten Zenz; Arndt Borkhardt; Hans G Drexler; Peter Möller; Roderick A F MacLeod; Christiane Pott; Stefan Schreiber; Lorenz Trümper; Markus Loeffler; Peter F Stadler; Peter Lichter; Roland Eils; Ralf Küppers; Michael Hummel; Wolfram Klapper; Philip Rosenstiel; Andreas Rosenwald; Benedikt Brors; Reiner Siebert Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2012-11-11 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Roland Schmitz; Ryan M Young; Michele Ceribelli; Sameer Jhavar; Wenming Xiao; Meili Zhang; George Wright; Arthur L Shaffer; Daniel J Hodson; Eric Buras; Xuelu Liu; John Powell; Yandan Yang; Weihong Xu; Hong Zhao; Holger Kohlhammer; Andreas Rosenwald; Philip Kluin; Hans Konrad Müller-Hermelink; German Ott; Randy D Gascoyne; Joseph M Connors; Lisa M Rimsza; Elias Campo; Elaine S Jaffe; Jan Delabie; Erlend B Smeland; Martin D Ogwang; Steven J Reynolds; Richard I Fisher; Rita M Braziel; Raymond R Tubbs; James R Cook; Dennis D Weisenburger; Wing C Chan; Stefania Pittaluga; Wyndham Wilson; Thomas A Waldmann; Martin Rowe; Sam M Mbulaiteye; Alan B Rickinson; Louis M Staudt Journal: Nature Date: 2012-08-12 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Ken H Young; Karen Leroy; Michael B Møller; Gisele W B Colleoni; Margarita Sánchez-Beato; Fábio R Kerbauy; Corinne Haioun; Jens C Eickhoff; Allen H Young; Philippe Gaulard; Miguel A Piris; Terry D Oberley; William M Rehrauer; Brad S Kahl; James S Malter; Elias Campo; Jan Delabie; Randy D Gascoyne; Andreas Rosenwald; Lisa Rimsza; James Huang; Rita M Braziel; Elaine S Jaffe; Wyndham H Wilson; Louis M Staudt; Julie M Vose; Wing C Chan; Dennis D Weisenburger; Timothy C Greiner Journal: Blood Date: 2008-06-17 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Nathalie A Johnson; Graham W Slack; Kerry J Savage; Joseph M Connors; Susana Ben-Neriah; Sanja Rogic; David W Scott; King L Tan; Christian Steidl; Laurie H Sehn; Wing C Chan; Javeed Iqbal; Paul N Meyer; Georg Lenz; George Wright; Lisa M Rimsza; Carlo Valentino; Patrick Brunhoeber; Thomas M Grogan; Rita M Braziel; James R Cook; Raymond R Tubbs; Dennis D Weisenburger; Elias Campo; Andreas Rosenwald; German Ott; Jan Delabie; Christina Holcroft; Elaine S Jaffe; Louis M Staudt; Randy D Gascoyne Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-07-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael J Kluk; Bjoern Chapuy; Papiya Sinha; Alyssa Roy; Paola Dal Cin; Donna S Neuberg; Stefano Monti; Geraldine S Pinkus; Margaret A Shipp; Scott J Rodig Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Heng Xu; Hui Zhang; Wenjian Yang; Rachita Yadav; Alanna C Morrison; Maoxiang Qian; Meenakshi Devidas; Yu Liu; Virginia Perez-Andreu; Xujie Zhao; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Philip J Lupo; Geoff Neale; Elizabeth Raetz; Eric Larsen; W Paul Bowman; William L Carroll; Naomi Winick; Richard Williams; Torben Hansen; Jens-Christian Holm; Elaine Mardis; Robert Fulton; Ching-Hon Pui; Jinghui Zhang; Charles G Mullighan; William E Evans; Stephen P Hunger; Ramneek Gupta; Kjeld Schmiegelow; Mignon L Loh; Mary V Relling; Jun J Yang Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 14.919