Literature DB >> 32981337

Evidence-Based Policy Making for Public Health Interventions in Cardiovascular Diseases: Formally Assessing the Feasibility of Clinical Trials.

Kathryn Foti1,2, Randi E Foraker3, Pamela Martyn-Nemeth4, Cheryl A M Anderson2,5, Nancy R Cook6, Alice H Lichtenstein7, Sarah D de Ferranti8,9, Deborah Rohm Young10, Marie-France Hivert11,12, Robert Ross13, Prakash Deedwania14, Laurie P Whitsel15, Lawrence J Appel1,2,16.   

Abstract

Implementation of prevention policies has often been impeded or delayed due to the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with hard clinical outcomes (eg, incident disease, mortality). Despite the prominent role of RCTs in health care, it may not always be feasible to conduct RCTs of public health interventions with hard outcomes due to logistical and ethical considerations. RCTs may also lack external validity and have limited generalizability. Currently, there is insufficient guidance for policymakers charged with establishing evidence-based policy to determine whether an RCT with hard outcomes is needed before policy recommendations. In this context, the purpose of this article is to assess, in a case study, the feasibility of conducting an RCT of the oft-cited issue of sodium reduction on cardiovascular outcomes and then propose a framework for decision-making, which includes an assessment of the feasibility of conducting an RCT with hard clinical outcomes when such trials are unavailable. We designed and assessed the feasibility of potential individual- and cluster-randomized trials of sodium reduction on cardiovascular outcomes. Based on our assumptions, a trial using any of the designs considered would require tens of thousands of participants and cost hundreds of millions of dollars, which is prohibitively expensive. Our estimates may be conservative given several key challenges, such as the unknown costs of sustaining a long-term difference in sodium intake, the effect of differential cotreatment with antihypertensive medications, and long lag time to clinical outcomes. Thus, it would be extraordinarily difficult to conduct such a trial, and despite the high costs, would still be at substantial risk for a spuriously null result. A robust framework, such as the one we developed, should be used to guide policymakers when establishing evidence-based public health interventions in the absence of trials with hard clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular disease; decision-making; policy; prevention; public health; randomized controlled trial

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32981337      PMCID: PMC7674216          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  45 in total

Review 1.  Can We End the Salt Wars With a Randomized Clinical Trial in a Controlled Environment?

Authors:  Daniel W Jones; Friedrich C Luft; Paul K Whelton; Michael H Alderman; John E Hall; Eric D Peterson; Robert M Califf; David A McCarron
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 2.  Screening for hypertension in children and adolescents to prevent cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Matthew Thompson; Tracy Dana; Christina Bougatsos; Ian Blazina; Susan L Norris
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Methodological issues in cohort studies that relate sodium intake to cardiovascular disease outcomes: a science advisory from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Laura K Cobb; Cheryl A M Anderson; Paul Elliott; Frank B Hu; Kiang Liu; James D Neaton; Paul K Whelton; Mark Woodward; Lawrence J Appel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  The effects of nonpharmacologic interventions on blood pressure of persons with high normal levels. Results of the Trials of Hypertension Prevention, Phase I.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-03-04       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Recent Trends in Cardiovascular Mortality in the United States and Public Health Goals.

Authors:  Stephen Sidney; Charles P Quesenberry; Marc G Jaffe; Michael Sorel; Mai N Nguyen-Huynh; Lawrence H Kushi; Alan S Go; Jamal S Rana
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 14.676

6.  Urinary sodium and potassium excretion, mortality, and cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Martin O'Donnell; Andrew Mente; Sumathy Rangarajan; Matthew J McQueen; Xingyu Wang; Lisheng Liu; Hou Yan; Shun Fu Lee; Prem Mony; Anitha Devanath; Annika Rosengren; Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo; Rafael Diaz; Alvaro Avezum; Fernando Lanas; Khalid Yusoff; Romaina Iqbal; Rafal Ilow; Noushin Mohammadifard; Sadi Gulec; Afzal Hussein Yusufali; Lanthe Kruger; Rita Yusuf; Jephat Chifamba; Conrad Kabali; Gilles Dagenais; Scott A Lear; Koon Teo; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Accelerating evidence reviews and broadening evidence standards to identify effective, promising, and emerging policy and environmental strategies for prevention of childhood obesity.

Authors:  Laura Brennan; Sarah Castro; Ross C Brownson; Julie Claus; C Tracy Orleans
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the Salt Substitute and Stroke Study (SSaSS)-A large-scale cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Bruce Neal; Maoyi Tian; Nicole Li; Paul Elliott; Lijing L Yan; Darwin R Labarthe; Liping Huang; Xuejun Yin; Zhixin Hao; Sandrine Stepien; Jingpu Shi; Xiangxian Feng; Jianxin Zhang; Yuhong Zhang; Ruijuan Zhang; Yangfeng Wu
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Low-fat dietary pattern and cardiovascular disease: results from the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ross L Prentice; Aaron K Aragaki; Linda Van Horn; Cynthia A Thomson; Shirley Aa Beresford; Jennifer Robinson; Linda Snetselaar; Garnet L Anderson; JoAnn E Manson; Matthew A Allison; Jacques E Rossouw; Barbara V Howard
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Charles Weijer; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Martin P Eccles; Andrew D McRae; Angela White; Jamie C Brehaut; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The impact of excessive salt intake on human health.

Authors:  Robert W Hunter; Neeraj Dhaun; Matthew A Bailey
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 2.  Rigorous Policy-Making Amid COVID-19 and Beyond: Literature Review and Critical Insights.

Authors:  Zhaohui Su
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.