Literature DB >> 32981051

Conventional landmark palpation vs. preprocedural ultrasound for neuraxial analgesia and anaesthesia in obstetrics - a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analyses.

B Young1, D Onwochei1, N Desai1,2.   

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the efficacy, time taken and the safety of neuraxial blockade performed for obstetric patients with the assistance of preprocedural ultrasound, in comparison with the landmark palpation method. The bibliographic databases Central, CINAHL, EMBASE, Global Health, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from inception to 13 February 2020 for randomised controlled trials that included pregnant women having neuraxial procedures with preprocedural ultrasound as the intervention and conventional landmark palpation as the comparator. For continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively, we calculated the mean difference using the inverse-variance method and the risk ratio with the Mantel-Haenszel method. In all, 22 trials with 2462 patients were included. Confirmed by trial sequential analysis, preprocedural ultrasound increased the first-pass success rate by a risk ratio (95%CI) of 1.46 (1.16-1.82), p = 0.001 in 13 trials with 1253 patients. No evidence of a difference was found in the total time taken between preprocedural ultrasound and landmark palpation, with a mean difference (95%CI) of 50.1 (-13.7 to 113.94) s, p = 0.12 in eight trials with 709 patients. The quality of evidence was graded as low and very low, respectively, for these co-primary outcomes. Sub-group analysis underlined the increased benefit of preprocedural ultrasound for those in whom the neuraxial procedure was predicted to be difficult. Complications, including postpartum back pain and headache, were decreased with preprocedural ultrasound. The adoption of preprocedural ultrasound for neuraxial procedures in obstetrics is recommended and, in the opinion of the authors, should be considered as a standard of care, in view of its potential to increase efficacy and reduce complications without significant prolongation of the total time required.
© 2020 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidural analgesia; landmark palpation; obstetric; spinal anaesthesia; ultrasound

Year:  2020        PMID: 32981051     DOI: 10.1111/anae.15255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  4 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound-facilitated neuraxial anaesthesia in obstetrics.

Authors:  A Sadeghi; R Patel; J C A Carvalho
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2021-08-19

Review 2.  Update on applied epidural anatomy.

Authors:  D Macpherson; F Quondamatteo; M Broom
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2022-02-23

3.  Recognized and unrecognized dural punctures in 12,981 labor epidurals: an audit of management.

Authors:  Victoria A Eley; Wally Abeypala; Andrea Kelley; Nihal Kumta; Adrian Chin
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Real-time ultrasound-guided versus anatomic landmark-based thoracic epidural placement: a prospective, randomized, superiority trial.

Authors:  Jatuporn Pakpirom; Kanthida Thatsanapornsathit; Nalinee Kovitwanawong; Suttasinee Petsakul; Pannawit Benjhawaleemas; Kwanruthai Narunart; Somrutai Boonchuduang; Manoj Kumar Karmakar
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 2.376

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.