Literature DB >> 32979371

Subclinical Structural Valve Degeneration in Young Patients With Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves.

Edward D Percy1, Morgan Harloff1, Sameer Hirji1, Alexandra Malarczyk1, Olena Cherkasky1, Farhang Yazdchi1, Siobhan McGurk1, Prem Shekar1, Tsuyoshi Kaneko2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bioprosthetic structural valve degeneration (SVD) has previously been a clinical diagnosis, but subclinical changes have been increasingly recognized in transcatheter valves. The significance of subclinical SVD after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), however, is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to characterize the incidence and outcomes of subclinical SVD in young patients after SAVR.
METHODS: Patients aged ≤65 years who underwent bioprosthetic SAVR between January 2002 and June 2018 at a single institution were included. Endocarditis cases and those with in-hospital mortality were excluded. All available longitudinal postoperative echocardiograms were reviewed. Subclinical SVD was defined as an increase in mean transvalvular gradient of at least 10 mm Hg and/or new onset of mild intraprosthetic regurgitation or increase by at least 1 grade, compared with baseline postoperative echocardiogram.
RESULTS: Overall, 822 unique SAVR cases were included. Over the study period, 356 (43.3%) patients developed subclinical SVD. Only 21.5% of those with subclinical SVD progressed to clinical SVD or to repeat aortic valve procedures. In those with progression, the first signs of SVD occurred significantly earlier than in those whose changes remained stable (11 months vs 23 months; P = .036). Anticoagulation did not impact the development or progression of subclinical SVD. There was no difference in long-term survival for those who did or did not develop subclinical SVD.
CONCLUSIONS: Subclinical SVD occurred in a large proportion of young patients undergoing bioprosthetic SAVR. Despite its high prevalence, subclinical SVD was not associated with decreased survival or repeat procedures.
Copyright © 2021 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 32979371     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  2 in total

1.  Mechanical aortic valve prostheses offer a survival benefit in 50-65 year olds: AUTHEARTVISIT study.

Authors:  Denise Traxler; Pavla Krotka; Maria Laggner; Michael Mildner; Alexandra Graf; Berthold Reichardt; Ralph Wendt; Johann Auer; Bernhard Moser; Julia Mascherbauer; Hendrik Jan Ankersmit
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 5.722

2.  Trifecta versus Perimount Magna Ease aortic valves: Failure mechanisms.

Authors:  Ryo Suzuki; Toshiro Ito; Masato Suzuki; Shunsuke Ohori; Ryo Takayanagi; Shiro Miura
Journal:  Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann       Date:  2022-05-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.