Literature DB >> 32979121

Liquid biopsy as a perioperative biomarker of digestive tract cancers: review of the literature.

Katsutoshi Shoda1, Ryo Saito1, Suguru Maruyama1, Shinji Furuya1, Hidenori Akaike1, Yoshihiko Kawaguchi1, Hidetake Amemiya1, Hiromichi Kawaida1, Makoto Sudo1, Shingo Inoue1, Hiroshi Kono1, Daisuke Ichikawa2.   

Abstract

Tissue biopsies are the gold-standard for investigating the molecular characterization of tumors. However, a "solid" biopsy is an invasive procedure that cannot capture real-time tumor dynamics and may yield inaccurate information because of intratumoral heterogeneity. In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge about surgical treatment-associated "liquid" biopsy for patients with digestive organ tumors. A liquid biopsy is a technique involving the sampling and testing of non-solid biological materials, including blood, urine, saliva, and ascites. Previous studies have reported the potential value of blood-based biomarkers, circulating tumor cells, and cell-free nucleic acids as facilitators of cancer treatment. The applications of a liquid biopsy in a cancer treatment setting include screening and early diagnosis, prognostication, and outcome and recurrence monitoring of cancer. This technique has also been suggested as a useful tool in personalized medicine. The transition to precision medicine is still in its early stages. Soon, however, liquid biopsy is likely to form the basis of patient selection for molecular targeted therapies, predictions regarding chemotherapy sensitivity, and real-time evaluations of therapeutic effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digestive tract cancers; Liquid biopsies; Perioperative biomarkers

Year:  2020        PMID: 32979121     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02148-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  124 in total

1.  Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Yung-Jue Bang; Eric Van Cutsem; Andrea Feyereislova; Hyun C Chung; Lin Shen; Akira Sawaki; Florian Lordick; Atsushi Ohtsu; Yasushi Omuro; Taroh Satoh; Giuseppe Aprile; Evgeny Kulikov; Julie Hill; Michaela Lehle; Josef Rüschoff; Yoon-Koo Kang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Clinical significance of gene mutation in ctDNA analysis for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Tomoko Shibayama; Siew-Kee Low; Makiko Ono; Takayuki Kobayashi; Kokoro Kobayashi; Ippei Fukada; Yoshinori Ito; Takayuki Ueno; Shinji Ohno; Yusuke Nakamura; Shunji Takahashi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  The future of liquid biopsy.

Authors:  Catherine Alix-Panabières
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Monitoring the HER2 copy number status in circulating tumor DNA by droplet digital PCR in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Katsutoshi Shoda; Daisuke Ichikawa; Yuji Fujita; Kiyoshi Masuda; Hidekazu Hiramoto; Junichi Hamada; Tomohiro Arita; Hirotaka Konishi; Shuhei Komatsu; Atsushi Shiozaki; Naoki Kakihara; Kazuma Okamoto; Hiroki Taniguchi; Issei Imoto; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 5.  Implementing anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: challenges and future perspectives.

Authors:  E Martinelli; D Ciardiello; G Martini; T Troiani; C Cardone; P P Vitiello; N Normanno; A M Rachiglio; E Maiello; T Latiano; F De Vita; F Ciardiello
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 6.  Circulating tumor cell-derived organoids: Current challenges and promises in medical research and precision medicine.

Authors:  Prakash P Praharaj; Sujit K Bhutia; Sunitha Nagrath; Rhonda L Bitting; Gagan Deep
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 10.680

7.  Genome-wide cell-free DNA fragmentation in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Stephen Cristiano; Alessandro Leal; Jillian Phallen; Jacob Fiksel; Vilmos Adleff; Daniel C Bruhm; Sarah Østrup Jensen; Jamie E Medina; Carolyn Hruban; James R White; Doreen N Palsgrove; Noushin Niknafs; Valsamo Anagnostou; Patrick Forde; Jarushka Naidoo; Kristen Marrone; Julie Brahmer; Brian D Woodward; Hatim Husain; Karlijn L van Rooijen; Mai-Britt Worm Ørntoft; Anders Husted Madsen; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Marcel Verheij; Annemieke Cats; Cornelis J A Punt; Geraldine R Vink; Nicole C T van Grieken; Miriam Koopman; Remond J A Fijneman; Julia S Johansen; Hans Jørgen Nielsen; Gerrit A Meijer; Claus Lindbjerg Andersen; Robert B Scharpf; Victor E Velculescu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Tumor heterogeneity and clonal cooperation influence the immune selection of IFN-γ-signaling mutant cancer cells.

Authors:  Jason B Williams; Shuyin Li; Emily F Higgs; Alexandra Cabanov; Xiaozhong Wang; Haochu Huang; Thomas F Gajewski
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  CTC-Derived Models: A Window into the Seeding Capacity of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs).

Authors:  Tala Tayoun; Vincent Faugeroux; Marianne Oulhen; Agathe Aberlenc; Patrycja Pawlikowska; Françoise Farace
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Sequencing-based counting and size profiling of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA enhance population screening of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  W K Jacky Lam; Peiyong Jiang; K C Allen Chan; Suk H Cheng; Haiqiang Zhang; Wenlei Peng; O Y Olivia Tse; Yu K Tong; Wanxia Gai; Benny C Y Zee; Brigette B Y Ma; Edwin P Hui; Anthony T C Chan; John K S Woo; Rossa W K Chiu; Y M Dennis Lo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.