Gianluca Piras1,2, Golda Grinblat3, Riccardo Albertini4,5, Vittoria Sykopetrites6,7, Shi-Xun Zhong8, Lorenzo Lauda6,7, Mario Sanna6,7. 1. Department of Otology and Skull Base Surgery, Gruppo Otologico and Mario Sanna Foundation, Via Emmanueli 42, 29121, Piacenza-Rome, Italy. gianlu.piras@libero.it. 2. Casa Di Cura "Piacenza" S.P.A., Piacenza, Italy. gianlu.piras@libero.it. 3. Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Affiliated to Technion University, Haifa, Israel. 4. Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Bologna, Italy. 5. Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy. 6. Department of Otology and Skull Base Surgery, Gruppo Otologico and Mario Sanna Foundation, Via Emmanueli 42, 29121, Piacenza-Rome, Italy. 7. Casa Di Cura "Piacenza" S.P.A., Piacenza, Italy. 8. Department of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma (TBSCC) is a rare, aggressive tumor. Surgery, alone or combined with radiotherapy, represent the mainstay of treatment. To report our experience in the treatment of TBSCC and evaluate the disease-specific survival, identifying the factors influencing this outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 66 patients between 1993 and 2018. Patients were staged according to the University of Pittsburgh-modified TNM staging system. Nine cases (13.6%) were Stage I, 7 cases (10.6%) Stage II, 20 cases (30.3%) Stage III and 30 cases (45.5%) Stage IV. Twenty-four patients underwent lateral temporal bone resection (LTBR) and 42 patients underwent subtotal temporal bone resection (STBR). RESULTS: One hundred percent of Stage I and II patients showed no evidence of disease (NED) after a median follow-up of 101 months (range 1-289 months). NED resulted in 88.2% of Stage III (mean follow-up 80.3 months; range 8-257) and 46.4% of stage IV (mean follow-up 50.6 months; range 3-217). Pittsburgh Stage or involvement of mastoid, facial nerve, medial wall of the middle ear, temporomandibular joint and middle fossa dura emerged as negative prognostic factors. The highest mortality rate occurred in the first 2 years after treatment, due to local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis of TBSCC can be excellent in early stage tumors, employing a LTBR. In more advanced cases, prognosis is poor. STBR with adjuvant radiotherapy represents the treatment of choice, offering acceptable survival rates. Given the rarity of the pathology, many controversies still exist concerning optimal management.
OBJECTIVE: Temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma (TBSCC) is a rare, aggressive tumor. Surgery, alone or combined with radiotherapy, represent the mainstay of treatment. To report our experience in the treatment of TBSCC and evaluate the disease-specific survival, identifying the factors influencing this outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 66 patients between 1993 and 2018. Patients were staged according to the University of Pittsburgh-modified TNM staging system. Nine cases (13.6%) were Stage I, 7 cases (10.6%) Stage II, 20 cases (30.3%) Stage III and 30 cases (45.5%) Stage IV. Twenty-four patients underwent lateral temporal bone resection (LTBR) and 42 patients underwent subtotal temporal bone resection (STBR). RESULTS: One hundred percent of Stage I and II patients showed no evidence of disease (NED) after a median follow-up of 101 months (range 1-289 months). NED resulted in 88.2% of Stage III (mean follow-up 80.3 months; range 8-257) and 46.4% of stage IV (mean follow-up 50.6 months; range 3-217). Pittsburgh Stage or involvement of mastoid, facial nerve, medial wall of the middle ear, temporomandibular joint and middle fossa dura emerged as negative prognostic factors. The highest mortality rate occurred in the first 2 years after treatment, due to local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis of TBSCC can be excellent in early stage tumors, employing a LTBR. In more advanced cases, prognosis is poor. STBR with adjuvant radiotherapy represents the treatment of choice, offering acceptable survival rates. Given the rarity of the pathology, many controversies still exist concerning optimal management.