Jeongwook Lim1, Young Dae Cho2, Hyon-Jo Kwon1, Soo Hyoung Byoun1, Hyeon-Song Koh1, Bumsoo Park1, Seung-Won Choi1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea. 2. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea. aronnn@naver.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In medically refractory vasospasm, invasive intervention may be required. A commonly used approach is intra-arterial (IA) drug infusion. Although calcium channel blockers (CCBs) have been widely applied in this setting, studies comparing their efficacies and durations of action have been few. This study was performed to compare attributes of three CCBs (nicardipine, nimodipine, and verapamil), focusing on duration of the vasodilatory action based on angiography. METHODS: Vasospasm was produced in New Zealand white rabbits (N = 22) through experimentally induced subarachnoid hemorrhage and confirmed in each via conventional angiography, grouping them by IA-infused drug. After chemoangioplasty, angiography was performed hourly for 5 h to compare dilated and vasospastic arterial diameters. Drug efficacy, duration of action, and changes in mean arterial pressure (relative to baseline) were analyzed by group. RESULTS: Effective vasodilation was evident in all three groups immediately after IA drug infusion. The vasodilative effects of nimodipine and nicardipine peaked at 1 h and were sustained at 2 h, returning to initial vasospastic states at 3 h. In verapamil recipients, effects were more transient by comparison, entirely dissipating at 1 h. Only the nicardipine group showed a significant 3-h period of lowered blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Although nimodipine and nicardipine proved longer acting than verapamil in terms of vasodilation, their effects were not sustained beyond 2 h after IA infusion. Further study is required to confirm the vasodilatory duration of IA CCB based on perfusion status, and an effort should be made to find new alternative to extend the duration.
BACKGROUND: In medically refractory vasospasm, invasive intervention may be required. A commonly used approach is intra-arterial (IA) drug infusion. Although calcium channel blockers (CCBs) have been widely applied in this setting, studies comparing their efficacies and durations of action have been few. This study was performed to compare attributes of three CCBs (nicardipine, nimodipine, and verapamil), focusing on duration of the vasodilatory action based on angiography. METHODS:Vasospasm was produced in New Zealand white rabbits (N = 22) through experimentally induced subarachnoid hemorrhage and confirmed in each via conventional angiography, grouping them by IA-infused drug. After chemoangioplasty, angiography was performed hourly for 5 h to compare dilated and vasospastic arterial diameters. Drug efficacy, duration of action, and changes in mean arterial pressure (relative to baseline) were analyzed by group. RESULTS: Effective vasodilation was evident in all three groups immediately after IA drug infusion. The vasodilative effects of nimodipine and nicardipine peaked at 1 h and were sustained at 2 h, returning to initial vasospastic states at 3 h. In verapamil recipients, effects were more transient by comparison, entirely dissipating at 1 h. Only the nicardipine group showed a significant 3-h period of lowered blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Although nimodipine and nicardipine proved longer acting than verapamil in terms of vasodilation, their effects were not sustained beyond 2 h after IA infusion. Further study is required to confirm the vasodilatory duration of IA CCB based on perfusion status, and an effort should be made to find new alternative to extend the duration.
Authors: Thomas Kerz; Stephan Boor; Christian Beyer; Stefan Welschehold; Anke Schuessler; Joachim Oertel Journal: Br J Neurosurg Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 1.596
Authors: E Sander Connolly; Alejandro A Rabinstein; J Ricardo Carhuapoma; Colin P Derdeyn; Jacques Dion; Randall T Higashida; Brian L Hoh; Catherine J Kirkness; Andrew M Naidech; Christopher S Ogilvy; Aman B Patel; B Gregory Thompson; Paul Vespa Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Lei Feng; Brian-Fred Fitzsimmons; William L Young; Mitchell F Berman; Erwin Lin; Beverly D L Aagaard; Hoang Duong; John Pile-Spellman Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: G S Allen; H S Ahn; T J Preziosi; R Battye; S C Boone; S C Boone; S N Chou; D L Kelly; B K Weir; R A Crabbe; P J Lavik; S B Rosenbloom; F C Dorsey; C R Ingram; D E Mellits; L A Bertsch; D P Boisvert; M B Hundley; R K Johnson; J A Strom; C R Transou Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1983-03-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Chunyan Li; Timothy G White; Kevin A Shah; Wayne Chaung; Keren Powell; Ping Wang; Henry H Woo; Raj K Narayan Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 4.654