Literature DB >> 32978659

Silicone Breast Implant Injector: A Retooled Breast Augmentation Device.

Su-Ben Tsao1, Cheng-Chun Wu2.   

Abstract

Silicone breast implants are used worldwide for breast augmentation. After an axillary, periareolar or inframmary incision has been made to create an adequately sized pocket; the surgeon usually uses his or her fingers to insert the implant. The use of fingers makes the insertion process time-consuming, a few minutes or more. There are some complications, including need to ensure that the incision is long enough for the implant to be inserted, scar hypertrophy caused by implant insertion friction damage to the edge of incision, and the occasional need to ask the surgical assistant to lend more fingers to facilitate satisfactory insertion and placement. In addition, the use of gloved fingers to repeatedly push on the implant can increase the risk of contamination, postoperative silicone microleakage, and capsular contracture. To resolve these problems, we developed an improved silicone breast implant injector (reusable stainless steel 2007; single use polypropylene 2018) that can be used more easily than fingers and other "no touch" devices. From 2013 to 2017, the first author, a plastic surgeon at our clinic, used the 2007 reusable stainless steel injector to perform breast augmentations in 53 patients (Ave. age 23.8 years; range 19-67 years), 5 (8.8%) receiving 250-ml implants, 41 (77.4%) 251-300-ml implants, and 7 (13.8%) 301-400-ml implants. Overall, results were satisfactory except for two patients (3.7%) in whom capsular contracture occurred. There were no ruptures. Use of the injector made it possible to shorten the length of the incisions from the traditional 4-7 to 3-4 cm and expedited insertion time from a few minutes to a few seconds. This "no touch" insertion technique reduced implant damage caused by finger pushing, leading to a decrease in silicone microleakage and capsular contracture rate. It was performed with no friction trauma to the incision edge or harm to the surgeon's fingers. It was found to be an effective alternative operative tool for the insertion of silicone breast implants.Level of evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast augmentation; Implant; Injector; Insertion; Tool

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32978659     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-020-01966-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  9 in total

1.  Textured silicone breast implants.

Authors:  Richard Mladick
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Subclinical infection as a possible cause of significant breast capsules.

Authors:  David T Netscher
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Contamination in smooth gel breast implant placement: testing a funnel versus digital insertion technique in a cadaver model.

Authors:  Hunter R Moyer; Bahair Ghazi; Neil Saunders; Albert Losken
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 4.  Understanding the Etiology and Prevention of Capsular Contracture: Translating Science into Practice.

Authors:  Simon J Chong; Anand K Deva
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.017

5.  Subclinical infection of the silicone breast implant surface as a possible cause of capsular contracture.

Authors:  C P Virden; M K Dobke; P Stein; C L Parsons; D H Frank
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.326

6.  An illuminating no-touch device for breast augmentation.

Authors:  Michael Sg Bell; Daniel McKee
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2009

7.  A simple method to inset and position polyurethane-covered breast implants.

Authors:  Manuel Francisco Castello; Sheng Han; Alessandro Silvestri; Luca Grassetti; Matteo Torresetti; Yi Xin Zhang; Aurelia Trisliana Perdanasari; Claudio Marcelli; Diego Gigliotti; Davide Lazzeri
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 8.  Infection in breast implants.

Authors:  Brigitte Pittet; Denys Montandon; Didier Pittet
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 9.  Capsular Contracture after Breast Augmentation: An Update for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Hannah Headon; Adbul Kasem; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-09-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.