Literature DB >> 32977956

COVID-19 and occupational skin hazards for anaesthetists.

Nicole Z Spence1, Maegan E Lu2, Allison R Larson3, Rafael Ortega4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; contact dermatitis; dermatitis; gloves; hand hygiene; irritant dermatitis; occupational hazards; personal protective equipment

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32977956      PMCID: PMC7467089          DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.08.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


× No keyword cloud information.
Editor—Anaesthesiologists are expected to adhere strictly to the WHO ‘5 Moments for Hand Hygiene’ during patient care, including tracheal intubation and extubation. These moments include before and after touching a patient or their surroundings, before aseptic procedures, and after patient bodily fluid exposure. Thus, the hazards of frequent hand hygiene are an important consideration for anaesthesiologists. The presence of a pandemic further highlights these risks; in particular, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has reinforced awareness regarding hazards exacerbated by hand hygiene practices and use of personal protective equipment (PPE). The Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) recommends hand decontamination between each step of donning and doffing PPE. These practices increase exposure to a variety of irritants and allergens that can have deleterious effects on the skin and the individual. Anaesthesiologists who have suffered from irritant or allergic contact dermatitis can be subject to incapacitating personal and professional losses as this ailment may prevent them from providing direct patient care. Survey evidence before COVID-19 suggests that contact dermatitis affects ∼4% of healthcare workers and comprises 70–90% of skin diseases among them. Risk stratification is based on several factors. Those who have a history of atopy are at higher risk of developing contact dermatitis. Although Black and Hispanic populations may have a higher incidence of severe atopic dermatitis, studies on skin barrier function in different racial or ethnic groups have not shown consistent differences in epidermal structure or the development of contact dermatitis with exposure to irritants. , Extrinsic risk factors for contact dermatitis include prolonged glove use and hand washing. Thus, the prevalence of dermatitis is expected to increase during a pandemic as a result of excessive precautionary measures. , Hand hygiene techniques have a broad spectrum of potential adverse effects, ranging from cutaneous xerosis (abnormally dry skin) to severe allergic or irritant reactions. Acutely, contact dermatitis may present with skin erythema, oozing, scaling, crusting, or vesicles (Fig. 1 ). If chronic, contact dermatitis can lead to lichenification and fissures. About 80% of contact dermatitis is irritant in nature and the remainder true type IV hypersensitivity reactions. Soaps and detergents are a common cause of irritant contact dermatitis.
Fig 1

Irritant contact dermatitis in an anaesthesiologist after repetitive hand sanitising that developed in April 2020 during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The contact dermatitis was complicated by Staphylococcus aureus superinfection.

Irritant contact dermatitis in an anaesthesiologist after repetitive hand sanitising that developed in April 2020 during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The contact dermatitis was complicated by Staphylococcus aureus superinfection. Hand cleansing, while important in maintaining provider and patient safety, may be excessive during a pandemic and potentiate adverse dermatologic outcomes. Excessive use of an alcohol-based hand rub every 15 min for 8 h for 5 sequential days increased volunteers' irritant contact dermatitis scores and subjective complaints. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increased rate of irritant contact dermatitis associated with hand washing >10 times per day between January and February 2020 amongst Chinese healthcare workers. Rates of occupational contact dermatitis amongst 280 healthcare workers were higher in February 2020 (74.5%) than during normal working conditions (31.5%) and during the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak (21.4–35.5%). Increased precaution may encompass excessive hand hygiene practices, which can lead to harmful dermatologic effects for the provider. Another source of potentially avoidable contact dermatitis may be the excessive use of occlusive gloves. Between January and February 2020, 542 healthcare workers in Hubei, China reported that prolonged glove use was associated with skin damage symptoms such as erythema, maceration, and fissures. Irritant and allergic components of occlusive gloves include natural rubber latex, neoprene, elastyrene, nitrile, and polyvinyl chloride, which may further exacerbate the condition. Anaesthesiologists should seek treatment early to minimise the risk of worsening dermatitis, even though there is insufficient evidence that healthcare workers with dermatitis are more likely to transmit infection. Frequent application of moisturisers and diligent avoidance of identifiable triggers is paramount to management. For active therapy of localised lesions, moderate to high potency topical corticosteroids may be used as first-line treatment. Serous crusting may indicate bacterial superinfection, which can be confirmed with cultures and treated with topical or oral antibiotics. The WHO proposed several strategies to mitigate the development or exacerbation of irritant contact dermatitis in the healthcare setting. These strategies include using less irritating hand hygiene products, avoiding unnecessary hand hygiene techniques that can cause excess irritation, and moisturising the skin. Frequent hand washing with soap and water before or after using alcohol-based hand rubs is unnecessary and may potentiate dermatitis. To minimise skin exposure to irritants while maintaining proper antisepsis, cleaning hands with alcohol-based sanitisers is preferred over antimicrobial soap, which often contains irritating additives such as iodophors, chlorhexidine, chloroxylenol, and triclosan. Chlorhexidine can also be found as an additive in alcohol-based sanitisers and is more likely to cause irritation when its concentration exceeds 4%. To mitigate skin damage from the combined effects of irritants and occlusion, lipid-based moisturisers should be incorporated into hand hygiene practices. Alcohol-based hand rinses containing 1–3% glycerol promote moisture retention. Additionally, hand creams containing humectants, fats, and oils can be used in between patient encounters. Diligent hand hygiene is crucial to prevent infection transmission. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, anaesthetists must be mindful to avoid redundant or excessive hand hygiene practices that can result in deleterious dermatologic complications and subsequent personal and professional losses.

Authors' contributions

Literature review and manuscript writing: NZS, ML Manuscript editing: all authors Dermatological input: ARL Topic development: RO NZS was afflicted with hand dermatitis and has given permission to reproduce the figure.

Declarations of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Ethnicity as a possible endogenous factor in irritant contact dermatitis: comparing the irritant response among Caucasians, blacks, and Asians.

Authors:  S P Modjtahedi; H I Maibach
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 2.  Diagnosis and management of contact dermatitis.

Authors:  Richard P Usatine; Marcela Riojas
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.292

Review 3.  Contact dermatitis.

Authors:  Rabia Sofia Rashid; Tang Ngee Shim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-06-30

4.  Does Adherence to World Health Organization Hand Hygiene Protocols in the Operating Room Have the Potential to Produce Irritant Contact Dermatitis in Anesthesia Providers?

Authors:  David J Birnbach; Nathan T McKenty; Lisa F Rosen; Kristopher L Arheart; Ruth Everett-Thomas; Scott F Lindsey
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  Atopic Dermatitis: Racial and Ethnic Differences.

Authors:  Adeline Mei-Yen Yong; Yong-Kwang Tay
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 3.478

6.  Adverse skin reactions among healthcare workers during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak: a survey in Wuhan and its surrounding regions.

Authors:  P Lin; S Zhu; Y Huang; L Li; J Tao; T Lei; J Song; D Liu; L Chen; Y Shi; S Jiang; Q Liu; J Xie; H Chen; Y Duan; Y Xia; Y Zhou; Y Mei; X Zhou; J Wu; M Fang; Z Meng; H Li
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 9.302

7.  Skin damage among health care workers managing coronavirus disease-2019.

Authors:  Jiajia Lan; Zexing Song; Xiaoping Miao; Hang Li; Yan Li; Liyun Dong; Jing Yang; Xiangjie An; Yamin Zhang; Liu Yang; Nuoya Zhou; Liu Yang; Jun Li; JingJiang Cao; Jianxiu Wang; Juan Tao
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 11.527

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.