| Literature DB >> 32977712 |
Marina A Katkova1, Grigory Y Zhigulin1, Roman V Rumyantcev1, Galina S Zabrodina1, Vladimir R Shayapov2, Maxim N Sokolov2,3, Sergey Y Ketkov1.
Abstract
Recently there has been a great deal of interest and associated research into aspects of the coordination chemistry of class="Chemical">lanthanides andEntities:
Keywords: DFT calculation; X-ray structure; bismuth(III); lanthanide(III); metallacrown; polynuclear metallamacrocyclic complex; tyrosinehydroximate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32977712 PMCID: PMC7582670 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25194379
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Schematic representation of Ln(III)-Cu(II) [15MC-5]. Hydrogen atoms, additional anions, and solvate molecules are omitted for the sake of simplicity.
Scheme 2Schematic representation of the synthesis of complex 1.
Figure 1UV-vis spectra of the aqueous solution of 1 (blue) and the analogous La complex (violet). Inset: Spectra at 575 nm (2.3 × 10−3 M).
Figure 2Diffuse reflection spectra of the sample obtained at temperatures: −175 °C (1), −141 °C (2), −100 °C (3), −58 °C (4), −21 °C (5), +21 °C (6).
Figure 3Dependence of dln(F(R)·E)/dE on energy at −175 °C.
Figure 4Temperature dependence of the dz2 → dx2-y2 transition energy (points) and its linear approximation (solid line). The graph shows the equation of a straight line that describes the experimental points in the best possible way.
Comparison of X-ray structural parameters of complex 1 with Bi(Cl)(H2O)[15-MCCu(II)Pyzha-5](NO3)2 [29] and Gd(H2O)3[15-MCCu(II)Tyrha-5](NO3)3 complexes [37].
| Distances [A] and angles [°] | 1A | 1B | Bi(Cl)(H2O)[15- MCCu(II)Pyzha-5] [ | Gd(H2O)3[15- MCCu(II)Tyrha-5] [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M-O(oxime) | 2.387(7)–2.506(8) | 2.412(8)–2.543(8) | 2.429(8)–2.451(7) | 2.406(5)–2.440(7) |
| Cu-O(oxime) | 1.911(7)–1.935(8) | 1.915(8)–1.941(9) | 1.912(8)–1.928(7) | 1.908(5)–1.944(6) |
| Cu-O(carbonyl) | 1.905(8)–1.961(8) | 1.916(8)–1.952(8) | 1.935(7)–1.951(7) | 1.909(7)–1.959(9) |
| Cu-N(imine) | 1.903(9)–1.914(10) | 1.898(10)–1.912(10) | 1.906(8)–1.947(10) | 1.866(9)–1.904(6) |
| Cu-N(amine) | 1.990(9)–2.021(9) | 2.000(9)–2.027(10) | 2.006(9)–2.024(10) | 1.990(9)–2.037(9) |
| Cu-O(solv) | 2.48(1), 2.57(2) | 2.42(1), 2.56(1) | 2.16(2)–2.37(1) | 2.553(9) |
| M-O(OH/H2O) | 2.106(8) | 2.047(7) | 2.555(10) | 2.35(1)–2.54(2) |
| Cu-O(NO3) | 2.44(1), 2.88(1) | 2.425(8), 2.95(1) | 2.32(2)–2.403(8) | 2.477(7), 2.95(1) |
| Cu-O(Tyrha) | 2.762(8) | 2.655(8) | - | 2.825(7) |
| M...M (across the dimer cavity) | 7.1742(6) | - | 8.3933(6) | |
| M...M (between dimers) | 9.2437(8) | - | 8.5158(6) | |
| O(oxime)-Cu-N(imine) | 90.8(4)–91.0(4) | 90.6(4)–91.5(4) | 89.5(3)–90.9(4) | 89.3(3)–90.9(4) |
| O(oxime)-M-O(oxime) | 70.6(3)–73.8(3) | 71.0(3)–72.9(3) | 71.5(3)–72.9(3) | 70.7(2)–71.5(2) |
Figure 5Top views of the structure of complex 1: (a) monomer and (b) dimer pair shown looking down the pseudo fivefold axis. The thermal ellipsoids drawn are at the 30% probability level. All hydrogen atoms, uncoordinated NO3ˉ and solvate water molecules are omitted for clarity.
Figure 6Side view of molecular structure of complex 1. The thermal ellipsoids drawn are at the 30% probability level. All hydrogen atoms, uncoordinated NO3ˉ, and solvate water molecules are omitted for clarity.
Figure 7Fragment of crystal packing of complex 1. All hydrogen atoms, uncoordinated NO3ˉ, and solvate water molecules are omitted for clarity.
Optimized interatomic distances and topological parameters at the (3,-1) critical points of the covalent bonds in the [Bi(15-MCCu(II)Tyrha-5)]3+/[La(15-MCCu(II)Tyrha-5)]3+ complexes. The level of DFT calculations is SR-PBE/rL2.
| Atoms | Distance, Å | ρ(rc), a.u. | ∇2ρ(rc), a.u. | ε |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-C 1 | 1.517–1.523/ | 0.250–0.252/ | –(0.508–0.494)/ | 0.106–0.107/ |
| 1.518–1.523 | 0.249–0.252 | –0.014 | 0.104–0.105 | |
| C-Nam 2 | 1.494–1.498/ | 0.244–0.246/ | –(0.485–0.475)/ | 0.016–0.019/ |
| 1.495–1.500 | 0.244–0.246 | –0.011 | 0.016–0.018 | |
| C-Nim 2 | 1.323/ | 0.358–0.359/ | –(1.177–1.172)/ | 0.277–0.279/ |
| 1.317–1.318 | 0.362 | –0.006 | 0.287–0.289 | |
| C-O | 1.283–1.284/ | 0.361–0.362/ | –(0.862–0.850)/ | 0.104–0.107/ |
| 1.285–1.286 | 0.36 | –0.011 | 0.099–0.102 | |
| N-O | 1.381–1.382/ | 0.323–0.324/ | –(0.131–0.128)/ | 0.069–0.070/ |
| 1.395–1.396 | 0.311–0.312 | –0.003 | 0.059–0.060 | |
| C-CR 3 | 1.549–1.552/ | 0.227–0.228/ | –(0.380–0.375)/ | 0.018–0.021/ |
| 1.547–1.550 | 0.228–0.230 | –0.008 | 0.018–0.021 | |
| C-Cring 4 | 1.508–1.509/ | 0.248/ | –(0.495–0.494)/ | 0.044–0.049/ |
| 1.508–1.510 | 0.247–0.248 | –0.003 | 0.043–0.048 |
1 C-C is the bond between the carbon atoms of the hydroximate chelate. 2 Herein after indices “am” and “im” correspond to the amine and imine nitrogen atoms respectively. 3 C-CR is the bond between the hydroximate chelate and the R = CH2(C6H4)OH substituent. 4 C-Cring is the bond between the CH2 and (C6H4)OH fragments.
Optimized interatomic distances, topological, and energy parameters at the (3,–1) critical points of the coordination bonds in the [Bi(15-MCCu(II)Tyrha-5)]3+/[La(15-MCCu(II)Tyrha-5)]3+ complexes. Table 2.
| Atoms | Distance, Å | ρ(rc), a.u. | ∇2ρ(rc), a.u. | ε | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bi-Oox 1/ | 2.433–2.442/ | 0.049–0.050/ | 0.167–0.170/ | –(0.053–0.052)/ | 16.3–16.8/ | 0.182–0.184/ |
| La-Oox 1 | 2.432–2.438 | 0.056–0.057 | 0.187–0.189 | –0.001 | 19.8–20.2 | 0.240–0.241 |
| Cu-Oox 1 | 1.973–1.984/ | 0.084–0.086/ | 0.381–0.396/ | –(0.129–0.124)/ | 38.8–40.4/ | 0.047–0.048/ |
| 1.992–2.006 | 0.080–0.082 | 0.352–0.369 | –0.006 | 35.9–37.7 | 0.041–0.042 | |
| Cu-Ocarb 1 | 1.933–1.936/ | 0.094/ | 0.444–0.447/ | –(0.150–0.148)/ | 46.5–47.0/ | 0.014–0.018/ |
| 1.934–1.937 | 0.094 | 0.442–0.446 | –0.001 | 46.3–46.9 | 0.023–0.027 | |
| Cu-Nim | 1.890–1.892/ | 0.114–0.115/ | 0.474–0.477/ | –(0.195–0.194)/ | 60.9–61.3/ | 0.071–0.074/ |
| 1.896–1.897 | 0.113 | 0.464–0.468 | –0.191 | 59.9–60.1 | 0.071–0.074 | |
| Cu-Nam | 2.034–2.049/ | 0.083–0.086/ | 0.281–0.293/ | –(0.121–0.115)/ | 36.0–37.9/ | 0.020–0.023/ |
| 2.036–2.054 | 0.083–0.086 | 0.277–0.292 | –0.007 | 35.4–37.6 | 0.019–0.021 |
1 Herein after indices “ox” and “carb” correspond to the oxime and carbonyl oxygen atoms, respectively.
Figure 8Deformation Electron Density maps in the plane of the oxime atoms O(1), O(2), and O(3): (a) For [Bi(15-MCCu(II)Tyrha-5)]3+; (b) For [La(15-MCCu(II)Tyrha-5)]3+. The contour lines start from 0.01 a.u. with step of 0.01 a.u. The maps are built at the same scale. The level of DFT calculations is PBE/x2c-TZVPall//SR-PBE/rL2.
Figure 9Deformation Electron Density isosurfaces at 0.01 a.u. in the region of the central ion and the five oxime oxygen atoms: (a) for [Bi(15-MCCu(II)Tyrha-5)]3+; (b) for [La(15-MCCu(II)Tyrha-5)]3+. The isosurfaces are built at the same scale. The level of DFT calculations is PBE/x2c-TZVPall//SR-PBE/rL2.