Literature DB >> 32977101

Syncope at SARS-CoV-2 onset.

Ciro Canetta1, Silvia Accordino1, Elisabetta Buscarini2, Gianpaolo Benelli3, Giuseppe La Piana4, Alessandro Scartabellati5, Giovanni Viganò6, Roberto Assandri7, Alberto Astengo8, Chiara Benzoni8, Gianfranco Gaudiano8, Daniele Cazzato9, Davide Sebastiano Rossi9, Susanna Usai10, Irene Tramacere11, Giuseppe Lauria12.   

Abstract

We describe clinical and laboratory findings in 35 patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction on nasopharyngeal swab experiencing one or multiple syncope at disease onset. Clinical neurologic and cardiologic examination, and electrocardiographic findings were normal. Chest computed tomography showed findings consistent with interstitial pneumonia. Arterial blood gas analysis showed low pO2, pCO2, and ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) indicating hypocapnic hypoxemia. Patients who presented with syncope showed significantly lower heart rate as compared to 68 SARS-CoV-2 positive that did not. Such poorer than expected compensatory heart rate increase may have led to syncope based on individual susceptibility. We speculate that SARS-CoV-2 could have caused angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor internalization in the nucleus of the solitary tract and other midbrain nuclei, impairing baroreflex and chemoreceptor response, and inhibiting the compensatory tachycardia during acute hypocapnic hypoxemia.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor; Baroreceptor reflex; Central chemoreceptors; Hypocapnic hypoxemia; SARS-CoV-2; Syncope

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32977101      PMCID: PMC7505046          DOI: 10.1016/j.autneu.2020.102734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Auton Neurosci        ISSN: 1566-0702            Impact factor:   3.145


Since the beginning of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic in Italy on February 19th, 2020, the Lombardy Region in Northern Italy has been one the most affected areas in Europe. The public hospital in the town of Crema was one of the first to face the exponential influx of patients. Thanks to the immediate adoption of available local procedures to cope with the hospitalization of patients with a potential viral spread, based on 2009 SARS and H1N1 pandemic strategic plan revised on December 2014 after Ebola outbreak, the Emergency Department could set up a standardized triage for any individual either reporting or presenting with fever, cough, or dyspnea, or having had contact with potentially COVID-19 carriers. Since February 21th, all consecutive suspected patients admitted to the hospital underwent a procedure including body temperature and pulse oximetry (SO2) recording, hematological screening, chest X-ray and/or computed tomography (CT) scan, and nasopharyngeal swab. Swabs were stored at +4 °C and immediately shipped to one of the laboratory of virology accredited by the Lombardy Region to perform diagnostic SARS-COV-2 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. Based on the clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings, patients were discharged to home in quarantine or admitted to the hospital. Recently, some case series have reported syncope as the first manifestation of SARS-CoV-2 infection, even in the absence of other common symptoms such as fever, cough, and dyspnea (Ebrille et al., 2020; Tape et al., 2020). Patients had in common comorbidities for heart disease, coronary artery disease, post-permanent pacemaker (PPM) or cardiac loop recorder implantation (Ebrille et al., 2020; Tape et al., 2020). We analyzed 411 consecutive patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction at nasopharyngeal swab among whom nearly 10% reported syncope at the onset of the infection (Benelli et al., 2020). Herewith we describe clinical and laboratory findings in 35 consecutive patients of whom all data were available that presented one or multiple (9 patients; 25.7%) syncopal events at disease onset. Findings were compared with those from 68 SARS-CoV-2 patients who did not experience any syncope and were admitted during the same period. Demographic data, functional respiratory findings, and mean arterial pressure values, did not differ between the two groups. Conversely, mean heart rate was significantly lower in patients who experienced syncope (Table 1 ).
Table 1

SARS-Cov-2 patients presenting with syncope initial features. SO2 is oxygen saturation; pCO2 and pO2 are partial pressure of CO2 and O2; FiO2 is fraction of inspired oxygen; PaO2/FiO2 is the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) to fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2); MAP is mean arterial pressure calculated as [diastolic + 1/3(systolic − diastolic)]. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE); angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB). Mean heart rate was significantly lower in syncope group both considering all patients (*p < 0.02; unpaired t-test) and those not taking beta-blockers (**p < 0.01; unpaired t-test).

Patients with syncope(n = 35)Patients without syncope(n = 68)
Age, years
 Mean (SD)74 (12)72 (12)
 Median (range)76 (44–93)73 (35–99)
Sex, n (%)
 Male24 (69%)51 (75%)
 Female11 (31%)17 (25%)
Repeated syncope, n (%)9 (26%)
SO2
 Mean (SD)94 (8)92 (5)
 Median (range)96 (52–99)93 (75–99)
pCO2
 Mean (SD)32 (40)33 (7)
 Median (range)32 (21–40)33 (17–65)
 pCO2 < 35, n (%)27 (77%)47 (70%)
pO2
 Mean (SD)64 (8)63 (14)
 Median (range)64 (51–81)62 (32−120)
 pO2 < 60, n (%)12 (34%)27 (40%)
FiO2
 Mean (SD)0.23 (0.05)0.26 (0.14)
 Median (range)0.21 (0.21–0.40)0.21 (0.21–0.9)
PaO2/FiO2
 Mean (SD)284 (60)266 (65)
 Median (range)289 (139–379)274 (80–375)
 P/F ≤ 300, n (%)20 (57%)43 (64%)
Heart rate (all patients)
 Mean (SD)*87 (17)95 (16)
 Median (range)88 (50–120)94 (58–140)
 FC > 100, n (%)6 (17%)19 (28%)
Heart rate (no beta-blocker)
 Mean (SD) **84 (15)96 (16)
 Median (range)82 (50–120)93 (58–140)
 FC > 100, n (%)5 (15%)17 (34%)
MAP
 Mean (SD)90 (16)93 (14)
 Median (range)87 (56–133)93 (56–129)
Drugs
 ACE inhibitors/ARB41.4%44%
 Beta-blockers31.4%26.5%
 Neuroleptic6.2%7.3%
SARS-Cov-2 patients presenting with syncope initial features. SO2 is oxygen saturation; pCO2 and pO2 are partial pressure of CO2 and O2; FiO2 is fraction of inspired oxygen; PaO2/FiO2 is the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) to fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2); MAP is mean arterial pressure calculated as [diastolic + 1/3(systolic − diastolic)]. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE); angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB). Mean heart rate was significantly lower in syncope group both considering all patients (*p < 0.02; unpaired t-test) and those not taking beta-blockers (**p < 0.01; unpaired t-test). Syncope occurred within 3.6 ± 2.7 days from hospital admission. Nine (25.7%) patients reported head trauma and one subdural haemorrhage. Associated onset symptoms were fever >37.5 °C in 17 (48.5%) patients, cough in 8 (22.8%), and dyspnoea in 7 (20%). Hypertension (45.7%), dyslipidaemia (17%), renal insufficiency (20%), hypothyroidism (5.7%), dementia (11.4%), cancer (11.4%), and atrial fibrillation (5.7%) were the most common comorbidities. Besides the personal history of first-ever syncope, no other signs of dysautonomia were reported. Among patients not reporting any syncope, onset symptoms were fever >37.5 °C in 48 (70.6%) patients, cough in 27 (39.7%), and dyspnoea in 21 (31%). Hypertension (42.6%), cancer (8.4%), renal insufficiency (7.4%), and atrial fibrillation (4.4%) were the most common comorbidities. The distribution of drugs potentially interfering with the heart rate was also similar between the groups (Table 1). The neurological examination was normal in all patients. Chest computed tomography showed single or multiple ground-glass and/or consolidative lung opacities consistent with interstitial pneumonia in all patients. Patients reporting syncope had normal clinical cardiac assessment. Consistently, their electrocardiogram showed corrected QT interval at rest ranging 409–511 ms (mean 451 ± 30; median 449.5; interquartile range 433–474), PR interval ranging 104–220 ms (mean 161 ± 35.5; median 153; interquartile range 136.5–195.5), and QRS complex duration ranging 66–134 ms (mean 95 ± 18; median 93; interquartile range 83–105.5), which were nearly within normal values. These findings made unlikely that patients suffered from a cardiomyopathy and sinus node disease related to the SARS-COV-2, which however was not systematically assessed. Initial arterial blood gas analysis showed low pO2, pCO2, and ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure (in mmHg) to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) which was consistent with a hypocapnic hypoxemia condition in most patients, with no difference between patients who reported syncope and those who did not (Table 1). However, patients with syncope showed a significantly lower compensatory heart rate increase, which could explain the clinical episodes (Yasuma and Hayano, 2000). This difference remained significant when patients not taking beta-blockers in the two groups were analyzed (Table 1), thus strengthening the pathophysiological hypothesis. Cardiovascular and respiratory systems strongly interact to ensure adequate oxygen release to tissues and organs in response to systemic variability under the control of two integrated pathways: central baroreception and chemoreception. The balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic inputs predominantly regulates heart rate response through the baroreflex control. The increased compensatory tachycardia response to hypoxia induces higher cardiac output, while stroke volume remains unchanged. Central chemoreception, besides detecting brain blood flow and metabolism and acid-base balance, alters the sympathetic tone in response to arterial PCO2 changes. The baroreceptor reflex control of heart rate is regulated by the brain renin–angiotensin system mainly in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) of the brainstem, where ACE2 is expressed (Doobay et al., 2007; Xia and Lazartigues, 2010). The chemoreception system has a wider nuclear involvement in the hindbrain, including the NTS (Nattie and Li, 2012). SARS-CoV-2 viral coat expresses the spike protein that contains a receptor-binding region with high affinity for the extracellular domain of angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor. Binding leads to ACE2 internalization. It has been shown that the loss of ACE2 at cell surface could precipitate existing cardiovascular, kidney and brain diseases (South et al., 2020). In patients experiencing syncope, SARS-CoV-2 could have caused ACE2 internalization in the NTS and other midbrain nuclei, thus altering the baroreflex and chemoreceptor responses, and partly inhibiting the compensatory increase of heart rate during acute hypocapnic hypoxemia. The causes of such individual susceptibility are unknown. However, this hypothesis finds support from some preclinical evidence. ACE2 in the NTS is required to maintain the normal sensitivity of the baroreflex control on heart rate (Xia and Lazartigues, 2010) and the experimental injection of ACE2 antagonist in the NTS reduced the baroreceptor response for reflex bradycardia (Diz et al., 2008). We speculated that individual patients with specific susceptibility developed an impaired response of baroreceptors and chemoreceptors to endogenous stimuli which led to the occurrence of syncope.
  8 in total

1.  Impact of acute hypoxia on heart rate and blood pressure variability in conscious dogs.

Authors:  F Yasuma; J I Hayano
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Differential expression of neuronal ACE2 in transgenic mice with overexpression of the brain renin-angiotensin system.

Authors:  Marc F Doobay; Lauren S Talman; Teresa D Obr; Xin Tian; Robin L Davisson; Eric Lazartigues
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Injections of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 inhibitor MLN4760 into nucleus tractus solitarii reduce baroreceptor reflex sensitivity for heart rate control in rats.

Authors:  Debra I Diz; Maria A Garcia-Espinosa; Stephen Gegick; Ellen N Tommasi; Carlos M Ferrario; E Ann Tallant; Mark C Chappell; Patricia E Gallagher
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.969

4.  COVID-19, ACE2, and the cardiovascular consequences.

Authors:  Andrew M South; Debra I Diz; Mark C Chappell
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  COVID-19 in a Patient Presenting with Syncope and a Normal Chest X-ray.

Authors:  Chantal Tapé; Katrina M Byrd; Su Aung; John R Lonks; Timothy P Flanigan; Natasha R Rybak
Journal:  R I Med J (2013)       Date:  2020-03-26

Review 6.  Central chemoreceptors: locations and functions.

Authors:  Eugene Nattie; Aihua Li
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 9.090

Review 7.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: central regulator for cardiovascular function.

Authors:  Huijing Xia; Eric Lazartigues
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.369

8.  Syncope as the presenting symptom of COVID-19 infection.

Authors:  Elisa Ebrille; Maria Teresa Lucciola; Claudia Amellone; Flavia Ballocca; Fabrizio Orlando; Massimo Giammaria
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2020-05-05
  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Factors Associated with Falls During Hospitalization for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Marcin Mikos; Błażej Szydło; Ivan Szergyuk; Maria Helena Santos de Oliveira; Michał Kuboń; Grzegorz Juszczyk; Brandon Michael Henry
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-05-27

Review 2.  COVID-19 and the peripheral nervous system. A 2-year review from the pandemic to the vaccine era.

Authors:  Arens Taga; Giuseppe Lauria
Journal:  J Peripher Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 5.188

3.  Syncope and silent hypoxemia in COVID-19: Implications for the autonomic field.

Authors:  Jacquie Baker; Anthony V Incognito; Richard J A Wilson; Satish R Raj
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.145

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.