Literature DB >> 32976877

Deep learning-based synthetic CT generation for paediatric brain MR-only photon and proton radiotherapy.

Matteo Maspero1, Laura G Bentvelzen2, Mark H F Savenije2, Filipa Guerreiro3, Enrica Seravalli3, Geert O Janssens4, Cornelis A T van den Berg2, Marielle E P Philippens3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To enable accurate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based dose calculations, synthetic computed tomography (sCT) images need to be generated. We aim at assessing the feasibility of dose calculations from MRI acquired with a heterogeneous set of imaging protocol for paediatric patients affected by brain tumours.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty paediatric patients undergoing brain radiotherapy were included. MR imaging protocols varied among patients, and data heterogeneity was maintained in train/validation/test sets. Three 2D conditional generative adversarial networks (cGANs) were trained to generate sCT from T1-weighted MRI, considering the three orthogonal planes and its combination (multi-plane sCT). For each patient, median and standard deviation (σ) of the three views were calculated, obtaining a combined sCT and a proxy for uncertainty map, respectively. The sCTs were evaluated against the planning CT in terms of image similarity and accuracy for photon and proton dose calculations.
RESULTS: A mean absolute error of 61 ± 14 HU (mean±1σ) was obtained in the intersection of the body contours between CT and sCT. The combined multi-plane sCTs performed better than sCTs from any single plane. Uncertainty maps highlighted that multi-plane sCTs differed at the body contours and air cavities. A dose difference of -0.1 ± 0.3% and 0.1 ± 0.4% was obtained on the D > 90% of the prescribed dose and mean γ2%,2mm pass-rate of 99.5 ± 0.8% and 99.2 ± 1.1% for photon and proton planning, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Accurate MR-based dose calculation using a combination of three orthogonal planes for sCT generation is feasible for paediatric brain cancer patients, even when training on a heterogeneous dataset.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Brain tumors; Image-to-image translation; Machine learning; Pediatric oncology; Synthetic CT

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32976877     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  12 in total

Review 1.  A Survey on Deep Learning for Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Ching-Wei Wang; Muhammad-Adil Khalil; Nabila Puspita Firdi
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17

2.  Feasibility of Synthetic Computed Tomography Images Generated from Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans Using Various Deep Learning Methods in the Planning of Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Gyu Sang Yoo; Huan Minh Luu; Heejung Kim; Won Park; Hongryull Pyo; Youngyih Han; Ju Young Park; Sung-Hong Park
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Prospective Clinical Feasibility Study for MRI-Only Brain Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Minna Lerner; Joakim Medin; Christian Jamtheim Gustafsson; Sara Alkner; Lars E Olsson
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Facilitating MR-Guided Adaptive Proton Therapy in Children Using Deep Learning-Based Synthetic CT.

Authors:  Chuang Wang; Jinsoo Uh; Thomas E Merchant; Chia-Ho Hua; Sahaja Acharya
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-06-25

5.  Influence of eye movement on lens dose and optic nerve target coverage during craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Bianca A W Hoeben; Enrica Seravalli; Amber M L Wood; Mirjam Bosman; Witold P Matysiak; John H Maduro; Astrid L H M W van Lier; Matteo Maspero; Gijsbert H Bol; Geert O Janssens
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-29

6.  Comparison of Synthetic Computed Tomography Generation Methods, Incorporating Male and Female Anatomical Differences, for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Only Definitive Pelvic Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Laura M O'Connor; Jae H Choi; Jason A Dowling; Helen Warren-Forward; Jarad Martin; Peter B Greer
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  An overview of artificial intelligence in oncology.

Authors:  Eduardo Farina; Jacqueline J Nabhen; Maria Inez Dacoregio; Felipe Batalini; Fabio Y Moraes
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2022-02-10

Review 8.  Generative Adversarial Networks in Brain Imaging: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Maria Elena Laino; Pierandrea Cancian; Letterio Salvatore Politi; Matteo Giovanni Della Porta; Luca Saba; Victor Savevski
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-03-23

9.  Dosimetric evaluation of cone-beam CT-based synthetic CTs in pediatric patients undergoing intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Khadija Sheikh; Dezhi Liu; Heng Li; Sahaja Acharya; Matthew M Ladra; William T Hrinivich
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.243

10.  Cone beam computed tomography based image guidance and quality assessment of prostate cancer for magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy in the pelvis.

Authors:  Jens M Edmund; Daniel Andreasen; Koen Van Leemput
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.