Literature DB >> 32976674

Magnification loupes in dentistry: A qualitative study of dental students' perspectives.

Danielle Wajngarten1, Ana Carolina Botta2, Patrícia Petromilli Nordi Sasso Garcia3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The nature of the oral operating field makes it a challenge for dentists to work while maintaining musculoskeletal health. Strategies have been studied in recent years to improve visualisation of the operating field, and the use of magnification systems has been recommended for providing additional benefits. Despite the growing body of evidence suggesting that the use of magnification improves visual acuity, the dentist's posture and the quality of dental procedures, few studies have analysed users' perspectives on these devices in terms of their adaptation process. These types of studies are important because they provide insight into the reality of the adaptation process required by magnification systems so that adjustments and improvements can be made to adapt these systems to the users' reality. Thus, we sought to explore the perspectives held by second-year students in an undergraduate dental program on the use of dental loupes during pre-clinical laboratory activities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 24 second-year dental students participated in semi-structured interviews exploring their perspectives of wearing dental loupes during their pre-clinical activities. Data collection and analysis were consistent with the qualitative content analysis methodology. All interview data were analysed using version 10 of the NVivo® analytical software.
RESULTS: Participants described that magnification can lead to the improvement of their work postures, hand skills and quality of dental procedures. Nevertheless, they reported a need for an adaptation period and for adjustments to the technical features of the magnification system.
CONCLUSION: The students had positive perspectives on the use of magnification in their dentistry training program, including improvements in posture, hand skills and procedure quality.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dental; education; lenses; qualitative research

Year:  2020        PMID: 32976674     DOI: 10.1111/eje.12605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Dent Educ        ISSN: 1396-5883            Impact factor:   2.355


  1 in total

1.  A RULA-Based Comparison of the Ergonomic Risk of Typical Working Procedures for Dentists and Dental Assistants of General Dentistry, Endodontology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, and Orthodontics.

Authors:  Fabian Holzgreve; Laura Fraeulin; Werner Betz; Christina Erbe; Eileen M Wanke; Dörthe Brüggmann; Albert Nienhaus; David A Groneberg; Christian Maurer-Grubinger; Daniela Ohlendorf
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.576

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.