| Literature DB >> 32976643 |
Owyn Butters1, Matt N Krosch2, Michell Roberts1, Donna MacGregor3,4.
Abstract
Traditional methods of cadaver detection in outdoor environments include manual ground search, cadaver dogs, and manned aerial reconnaissance during daylight. These methods have limitations; however, a potential low-cost alternative may be to employ thermal imaging equipment mounted on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to detect heat emitted by insect and bacterial activity on the decomposing remains. No studies have addressed the influence of wrappings on detection of maggot mass thermal signatures nor assessed thermal detection of smaller body fragments. We addressed these knowledge gaps by utilizing a two-phase experimental approach to explore thermal detection of carcasses using UAV-mounted infrared imaging. In Phase 1, pig body fragments were deposited on the surface or shallow buried. In Phase 2, whole pig carcasses were deposited in four conditions: on the surface uncovered, wrapped in plastic or carpet, or buried. Our results demonstrated that observable heat emissions from remains corresponded to peak insect activity during active decay and could be readily detected in uncovered whole carcasses and fragments. Although plastic and carpet wrappings partly impeded detection of insect heat signatures, these materials were clearly detectable themselves because of their contrast to the background ground surface. Thermal signatures of buried partial remains and disturbed gravesoil were also observed; however, the buried whole carcass transitioned to adipocere prior to the decay stage and without any insect colonization or heat signature. These data can inform operational implementation of this technique to complement existing search strategies to offer a robust, low-cost alternative for use where scene characteristics allow.Entities:
Keywords: drone; forensic search; maggot mass; surface deposition; thermal signature; wrappings
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32976643 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14581
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Forensic Sci ISSN: 0022-1198 Impact factor: 1.832