Literature DB >> 3297567

Analysis of recurrence following curative low anterior resection and stapled anastomoses for carcinoma of the middle third and lower rectum.

P L Colombo, C L Foglieni, C Morone.   

Abstract

In a series of 93 patients with middle and lower rectal cancer, who underwent potentially curative surgery by low anterior resection (LAR) with EEA stapled anastomosis or by abdominoperineal excision (APE) between January 1977 and December 1981, the incidence of recurrence and survival rate was compared. LAR with stapler was performed in 61 patients: 55 (90.2 percent) with tumors of the middle third and six (9.8 percent) for tumors of the lower third of the rectum. APE was performed in 32 patients: 13 (40.6 percent) with cancer of the midrectum and 19 (59.4 percent) of the lower rectum. Tumor site, Dukes' distribution, grade of malignancy, and extent of local spread were recorded. The tumor stages for LAR with stapler and for APE, respectively, were Dukes' A 7/1; Dukes' B 27/10; Dukes' C 25/18; Dukes' D 2/3. In a follow-up period of four years (range, 6 to 52 months) the overall recurrence rates were 20.4 percent in the LAR with stapled anastomosis group and 21 percent in the APE group. Local recurrence percentages were 9.8 percent after LAR and 14 percent after APE (P = N.S.). Distant recurrences were 12 percent and 14 percent, respectively. The four-year overall survival rates were 76.7 percent after LAR and 65.5 percent after APE (P = N.S.) The clinical and pathologic factors correlated with recurrence in low rectal carcinoma were reanalyzed and the controversial points of the surgical management for and against LAR with stapled anastomosis and APE were discussed. It is concluded that LAR with the EEA stapler can be carried out in the middle and lower rectum with the prospect of ultimate cure, when performed with proper technical skills in selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3297567     DOI: 10.1007/BF02556497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  8 in total

1.  Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the truth lies underneath.

Authors:  Jesús A Fernández-Represa; Julio M Mayol; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Parasacral surgery for curative treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  A K Huber; M von Flue
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Analysis of local recurrence rates after surgery alone for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J L McCall; M R Cox; D A Wattchow
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Survival and recurrence after low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: the results of a long-term study with a review of the literature.

Authors:  M Konn; T Morita; R Hada; Y Yamanaka; M Sasaki; H Munakata; H Suzuki; S Inoue; M Endoh; Y Sugiyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Results of the double stapling procedure in pelvic surgery.

Authors:  F D Griffen; C D Knight; C D Knight
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Variables related to risk of recurrence in rectal cancer without lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  H Ogiwara; T Nakamura; S Baba
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Sphincter-saving procedures for distal carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  T J Yeatman; K I Bland
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Routine pathologic evaluation of circular stapler anastomotic rings is not useful after resection for colorectal cancer: retrospective study and systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  James R Holden; Pam McIntosh; Garrett G R J Johnson; Jason Park; David J Hochman; Ashley Vergis; Benson Yip; Ramzi M Helewa; Eric Hyun
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-09-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.