Brianna Kispal1,2, Sandra A N Walker3,4. 1. Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3M2, Canada. 2. Department of Pharmacy, Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart St, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7, Canada. 3. Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3M2, Canada. sandra.walker@sunnybrook.ca. 4. Department of Pharmacy Bayview Campus, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center (SHSC), 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada. sandra.walker@sunnybrook.ca.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Tigecycline is one of few antibiotics active against multidrug-resistant bacteria; however, the assessment of dosing strategies to optimize its activity is needed. The purpose was to use Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) to determine if safe tigecycline dosing options attaining breakpoints for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) targets in non-critically ill adults could be identified. METHODS: Publications that evaluated tigecycline dosing regimens and provided mean PK variables of interest (minimum 2 of: elimination rate constant or half-life and volume of distribution or clearance), with SDs, were included. Weighted mean (±SDs) for each PK parameter were determined. Food and Drug Administration minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) tigecycline breakpoints for susceptible (MIC ≤ 2 μg/mL), intermediate (MIC 4 μg/mL), and resistant (MIC ≥ 8 μg/mL) Enterobacteriaceae were used. MCS probability distributions for PK-PD target attainment of AUC for total tigecycline plasma concentration from 0 to 24 h following an intravenous dose (AUCtotal, 0-24h) to MIC ratios of ≥ 18, 7, and 4.5 were generated, with success defined as ≥ 80% probability of target attainment at a given MIC. RESULTS: Ten studies (n = 442) were eligible. Tigecycline 150 mg IV q12h for ward patients with resistant bacteria up to a MIC of 0.48, 1, and 2 μg/mL for an AUCtotal, 0-24h/MIC target attainment of 18, 7, and 4.5, respectively, may be appropriate. CONCLUSION: Bacterial infections with tigecycline MICs ≥ 0.48-2 μg/mL, depending on AUCtotal, 0-24h/MIC target, may require treatment with alternate antibiotics due to target attainment failure.
PURPOSE:Tigecycline is one of few antibiotics active against multidrug-resistant bacteria; however, the assessment of dosing strategies to optimize its activity is needed. The purpose was to use Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) to determine if safe tigecycline dosing options attaining breakpoints for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) targets in non-critically ill adults could be identified. METHODS: Publications that evaluated tigecycline dosing regimens and provided mean PK variables of interest (minimum 2 of: elimination rate constant or half-life and volume of distribution or clearance), with SDs, were included. Weighted mean (±SDs) for each PK parameter were determined. Food and Drug Administration minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) tigecycline breakpoints for susceptible (MIC ≤ 2 μg/mL), intermediate (MIC 4 μg/mL), and resistant (MIC ≥ 8 μg/mL) Enterobacteriaceae were used. MCS probability distributions for PK-PD target attainment of AUC for total tigecycline plasma concentration from 0 to 24 h following an intravenous dose (AUCtotal, 0-24h) to MIC ratios of ≥ 18, 7, and 4.5 were generated, with success defined as ≥ 80% probability of target attainment at a given MIC. RESULTS: Ten studies (n = 442) were eligible. Tigecycline 150 mg IV q12h for ward patients with resistant bacteria up to a MIC of 0.48, 1, and 2 μg/mL for an AUCtotal, 0-24h/MIC target attainment of 18, 7, and 4.5, respectively, may be appropriate. CONCLUSION: Bacterial infections with tigecycline MICs ≥ 0.48-2 μg/mL, depending on AUCtotal, 0-24h/MIC target, may require treatment with alternate antibiotics due to target attainment failure.
Entities:
Keywords:
Monte Carlo simulation; Non-critically ill patients; Pharmacodynamic(s); Pharmacokinetic(s); Resistant gram-negative bacteria; Tigecycline
Authors: Antonio T Freire; Vasyl Melnyk; Min Ja Kim; Oleksiy Datsenko; Oleksandr Dzyublik; Felix Glumcher; Yin-Ching Chuang; Robert T Maroko; Gary Dukart; C Angel Cooper; Joan M Korth-Bradley; Nathalie Dartois; Hassan Gandjini Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 2.803
Authors: Helen W Boucher; George H Talbot; John S Bradley; John E Edwards; David Gilbert; Louis B Rice; Michael Scheld; Brad Spellberg; John Bartlett Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-01-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Darren Wong; Travis B Nielsen; Robert A Bonomo; Paul Pantapalangkoor; Brian Luna; Brad Spellberg Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Juliana M Coelho; Jane F Turton; Mary E Kaufmann; Judith Glover; Neil Woodford; Marina Warner; Marie-France Palepou; Rachel Pike; Tyrone L Pitt; Bharat C Patel; David M Livermore Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: A K Meagher; J A Passarell; B B Cirincione; S A Van Wart; K Liolios; T Babinchak; E J Ellis-Grosse; P G Ambrose Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2007-03-12 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Helen W Boucher; Paul G Ambrose; H F Chambers; Richard H Ebright; Amanda Jezek; Barbara E Murray; Jason G Newland; Belinda Ostrowsky; John H Rex Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2017-07-15 Impact factor: 7.759