Casadio Paolo1, Arena Alessandro1, Paolo Salucci2, Raimondo Diego1, Seracchioli Renato1. 1. Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, DIMEC, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. 2. Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, DIMEC, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. paolo.salucci@studio.unibo.it.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse is one of the most frequent gynecological procedures, and its frequency is expected to increase as the population is gradually aging. Mesh use in urogynecological surgery should be limited because of important and life-treating complications. Sacral mesh-less and lateral procedures have been described as safe and effective to treat apical compartment prolapse. In this video, we describe a new laparoscopic mesh-less cervicopexy in women with symptomatic uterovaginal prolapse who did not desire uterine preservation. METHODS: Eleven women with symptomatic uterovaginal prolapse [stage 2 or higher according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitative (POP-Q) classification system] underwent laparoscopic mesh-less cervicopexy to the sacrum and transverse fascia between May 2018 and June 2019. We performed application of the right uterosacral ligament starting from the sacrum and two semicontinous sutures including the transverse fascia, round ligament, prevescical peritoneum, pubocervical fascia and cervix that were subsequently knotted. RESULTS: At 6-month follow-up, the objective success rate for apical prolapse (POP-Q score C > -1) was 90.9% (10/11 women). Only one woman presented stage 3 apical prolapse recurrence with vaginal buldge. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic mesh-less cervicopexy for uterovaginal prolapse seems to be a feasible surgical technique at 6-month follow-up.
INTRODUCTION: Surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse is one of the most frequent gynecological procedures, and its frequency is expected to increase as the population is gradually aging. Mesh use in urogynecological surgery should be limited because of important and life-treating complications. Sacral mesh-less and lateral procedures have been described as safe and effective to treat apical compartment prolapse. In this video, we describe a new laparoscopic mesh-less cervicopexy in women with symptomatic uterovaginal prolapse who did not desire uterine preservation. METHODS: Eleven women with symptomatic uterovaginal prolapse [stage 2 or higher according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitative (POP-Q) classification system] underwent laparoscopic mesh-less cervicopexy to the sacrum and transverse fascia between May 2018 and June 2019. We performed application of the right uterosacral ligament starting from the sacrum and two semicontinous sutures including the transverse fascia, round ligament, prevescical peritoneum, pubocervical fascia and cervix that were subsequently knotted. RESULTS: At 6-month follow-up, the objective success rate for apical prolapse (POP-Q score C > -1) was 90.9% (10/11 women). Only one woman presented stage 3 apical prolapse recurrence with vaginal buldge. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic mesh-less cervicopexy for uterovaginal prolapse seems to be a feasible surgical technique at 6-month follow-up.
Authors: R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Margaret G Mueller; Kristin M Jacobs; Elizabeth R Mueller; Melinda G Abernethy; Kimberly S Kenton Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2016 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.091