Literature DB >> 32974967

Marine biomonitoring with eDNA: Can metabarcoding of water samples cut it as a tool for surveying benthic communities?

Adrià Antich1, Cruz Palacín2, Emma Cebrian3, Raül Golo3, Owen S Wangensteen4, Xavier Turon1.   

Abstract

In the marine realm, biomonitoring using environmental DNA (eDNA) of benthic communities requires destructive direct sampling or the setting-up of settlement structures. Comparatively much less effort is required to sample the water column, which can be accessed remotely. In this study we assess the feasibility of obtaining information from the eukaryotic benthic communities by sampling the adjacent water layer. We studied two different rocky-substrate benthic communities with a technique based on quadrat sampling. We also took replicate water samples at four distances (0, 0.5, 1.5, and 20 m) from the benthic habitat. Using broad range primers to amplify a ca. 313 bp fragment of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene, we obtained a total of 3,543 molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs). The structure obtained in the two environments was markedly different, with Metazoa, Archaeplastida and Stramenopiles being the most diverse groups in benthic samples, and Hacrobia, Metazoa and Alveolata in the water. Only 265 MOTUs (7.5%) were shared between benthos and water samples and, of these, 180 (5.1%) were identified as benthic taxa that left their DNA in the water. Most of them were found immediately adjacent to the benthos, and their number decreased as we moved apart from the benthic habitat. It was concluded that water eDNA, even in the close vicinity of the benthos, was a poor proxy for the analysis of benthic structure, and that direct sampling methods are required for monitoring these complex communities via metabarcoding.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benthos; biomonitoring; eDNA; marine; metabarcoding; water

Year:  2020        PMID: 32974967     DOI: 10.1111/mec.15641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  7 in total

1.  Environmental RNA as a Tool for Marine Community Biodiversity Assessments.

Authors:  Marissa S Giroux; Jay R Reichman; Troy Langknecht; Robert M Burgess; Kay T Ho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Influence of DNA extraction kits on freshwater fungal DNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Shunsuke Matsuoka; Yoriko Sugiyama; Mariko Nagano; Hideyuki Doi
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.061

3.  To denoise or to cluster, that is not the question: optimizing pipelines for COI metabarcoding and metaphylogeography.

Authors:  Adrià Antich; Creu Palacin; Owen S Wangensteen; Xavier Turon
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Evaluating sediment and water sampling methods for the estimation of deep-sea biodiversity using environmental DNA.

Authors:  Miriam I Brandt; Florence Pradillon; Blandine Trouche; Nicolas Henry; Cathy Liautard-Haag; Marie-Anne Cambon-Bonavita; Valérie Cueff-Gauchard; Patrick Wincker; Caroline Belser; Julie Poulain; Sophie Arnaud-Haond; Daniela Zeppilli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Sampling multiple life stages significantly increases estimates of marine biodiversity.

Authors:  Svetlana Maslakova; Christina I Ellison; Terra C Hiebert; Frances Conable; Maureen C Heaphy; Dagoberto E Venera-Pontón; Jon L Norenburg; Megan L Schwartz; Nicole D Moss; Michael J Boyle; Amy C Driskell; Kenneth S Macdonald; Eduardo E Zattara; Rachel Collin
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.812

6.  Application of Omics Tools in Designing and Monitoring Marine Protected Areas For a Sustainable Blue Economy.

Authors:  Nicholas W Jeffery; Sarah J Lehnert; Tony Kess; Kara K S Layton; Brendan F Wringe; Ryan R E Stanley
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Fine-scale differences in eukaryotic communities inside and outside salmon aquaculture cages revealed by eDNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Marta Turon; Magnus Nygaard; Gledis Guri; Owen S Wangensteen; Kim Præbel
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.772

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.