María Del Rosario Asensio-García1,2, María Isabel Tomás-Rodríguez2, Antonio Palazón-Bru3, Sergio Hernández-Sánchez2, Rauf Nouni-García1, Aída Lucía Romero-Aledo1, Vicente Francisco Gil-Guillén4. 1. Rehabilitation Service, University Hospital of San Juan de Alicante, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain. 2. Center for Translational Research in Physiotherapy, Department of Pathology and Surgery, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain. 3. Department of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, Ctra. Valencia-Alicante S/N, San Juan de Alicante, 03550, Alicante, Spain. antonio.pb23@gmail.com. 4. Department of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, Ctra. Valencia-Alicante S/N, San Juan de Alicante, 03550, Alicante, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Of the different modalities of rowing, dragon boat training is the most analyzed in breast cancer (BC). However, other types of boats, such as the felucca, use different biomechanical techniques, which have not been studied in the scientific literature. Consequently, in this study, we sought to determine the benefits of felucca rowing on the physical, psychological, and emotional well-being of patients with BC and healthy persons. METHODS: A pre- and post-intervention, single-arm study without a control group with a 4-month intervention was carried out in Spain in 2019. The study sample included six women with BC and 15 healthy women. The following questionnaires were administered before and after the intervention: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Constant-Murley score (CMS), and the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D, rate your health today). Differences were determined before and after the intervention using the paired t test. RESULTS: Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found in the results of all the questionnaires for the women with BC and for the healthy women: DASH (- 13.8 BC and - 6.7 healthy), CMS (+ 12.0 BC and 9.2 healthy), and EQ-5D (+ 8.5 BC and 10.5 healthy). CONCLUSION: Felucca rowing showed benefits in health and quality of life in both women with BC and healthy women. In future studies with controlled design, values regarding clinical relevance, such as effect sizes/confidence intervals, are needed to corroborate our results.
PURPOSE: Of the different modalities of rowing, dragon boat training is the most analyzed in breast cancer (BC). However, other types of boats, such as the felucca, use different biomechanical techniques, which have not been studied in the scientific literature. Consequently, in this study, we sought to determine the benefits of felucca rowing on the physical, psychological, and emotional well-being of patients with BC and healthy persons. METHODS: A pre- and post-intervention, single-arm study without a control group with a 4-month intervention was carried out in Spain in 2019. The study sample included six women with BC and 15 healthy women. The following questionnaires were administered before and after the intervention: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Constant-Murley score (CMS), and the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D, rate your health today). Differences were determined before and after the intervention using the paired t test. RESULTS: Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found in the results of all the questionnaires for the women with BC and for the healthy women: DASH (- 13.8 BC and - 6.7 healthy), CMS (+ 12.0 BC and 9.2 healthy), and EQ-5D (+ 8.5 BC and 10.5 healthy). CONCLUSION: Felucca rowing showed benefits in health and quality of life in both women with BC and healthy women. In future studies with controlled design, values regarding clinical relevance, such as effect sizes/confidence intervals, are needed to corroborate our results.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast neoplasms; Physical functional performance; Quality of life; Shoulder joint/physiopathology; Upper extremity/physiopathology; Water sports/therapeutic use
Authors: Cindy L Carter; Georgiana Onicescu; Kathleen B Cartmell; Katherine R Sterba; James Tomsic; Todd Fox; Erica Dunmeyer; Anthony J Alberg Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2010-07-27 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Timothy Hasenoehrl; Stefano Palma; Dariga Ramazanova; Heinz Kölbl; Thomas E Dorner; Mohammad Keilani; Richard Crevenna Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Juan Gavala-González; Amanda Torres-Pérez; José Carlos Fernández-García Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 3.390