Literature DB >> 32974792

Medical Students' Attitudes Towards Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement With Methylphenidate.

Nelly Erasmus1, Carla Kotzé2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess medical students' perception of pharmacological cognitive enhancement (PCE) with methylphenidate and to determine whether this perception differs between junior and senior medical students.
METHODS: The second and fifth year medical student groups of 2017 at a specific university completed self-administered questionnaires in order to investigate if there were a difference in their attitudes towards methylphenidate use for PCE.
RESULTS: A total of 353 students were included as follows: 135 second year and 218 fifth year students. Fifth year students were more aware of PCE with methylphenidate than second year students (94% versus 87%; p value = 0.02). Many students (second year = 86%; fifth year = 71%; p value = 0.2469) were of the opinion that methylphenidate could enhance academic performance. Sixty-six percent of all the students were concerned about the fairness of PCE; 93% were concerned about the harmfulness of methylphenidate. There were no statistical significant differences in the attitudes towards methylphenidate use for PCE between the two groups of junior and senior students.
CONCLUSION: In both groups, the majority of students were against the use of methylphenidate for PCE in students without attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder. Their attitudes regarding the use of methylphenidate for non-medical purposes did not differ significantly. Addressing the topic of PCE with medical students is essential, and the impact on their practice can be an important direction for future research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitudes; Medical students; Pharmacological cognitive enhancement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32974792     DOI: 10.1007/s40596-020-01303-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Psychiatry        ISSN: 1042-9670


  17 in total

Review 1.  Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do?

Authors:  Martha J Farah; Judy Illes; Robert Cook-Deegan; Howard Gardner; Eric Kandel; Patricia King; Eric Parens; Barbara Sahakian; Paul Root Wolpe
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Cognitive enhancement.

Authors:  Martha J Farah; M Elizabeth Smith; Irena Ilieva; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-10-22

3.  Cognitive enhancement: methods, ethics, regulatory challenges.

Authors:  Nick Bostrom; Anders Sandberg
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Cognitive enhancement: promises and perils.

Authors:  Steven E Hyman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Cognitive enhancement drug use among future physicians: findings from a multi-institutional census of medical students.

Authors:  Robyn M Emanuel; Sandra L Frellsen; Kathleen J Kashima; Sandra M Sanguino; Frederick S Sierles; Cathy J Lazarus
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Non-medical use of prescription stimulants and illicit use of stimulants for cognitive enhancement in pupils and students in Germany.

Authors:  A G Franke; C Bonertz; M Christmann; M Huss; A Fellgiebel; E Hildt; K Lieb
Journal:  Pharmacopsychiatry       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.788

7.  Methylphenidate use among medical students at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.

Authors:  Yael Givon Cohen; Renana Wilkof Segev; Nurit Shlafman; Victor Novack; Gal Ifergane
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

Review 8.  Attitudes toward pharmacological cognitive enhancement-a review.

Authors:  Kimberly J Schelle; Nadira Faulmüller; Lucius Caviola; Miles Hewstone
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-17

9.  Robust resilience and substantial interest: a survey of pharmacological cognitive enhancement among university students in the UK and Ireland.

Authors:  Ilina Singh; Imre Bard; Jonathan Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Swiss University Students' Attitudes toward Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement.

Authors:  Larissa J Maier; Evangelia Liakoni; Jan Schildmann; Michael P Schaub; Matthias E Liechti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.