Literature DB >> 32974729

Reply to the likeliness of 0.5 and 1.0 ms stimuli in bilateral electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

Aida de Arriba-Arnau1,2, Virginia Soria1,2,3, Mikel Urretavizcaya4,5,6.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2020        PMID： 32974729     DOI： 10.1007/s00406-020-01192-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci        ISSN： 0940-1334            Impact factor:   5.270


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  The efficacy of ultrabrief-pulse (0.25 millisecond) versus brief-pulse (0.50 millisecond) bilateral electroconvulsive therapy in major depression.

Authors:  Lotte Niemantsverdriet; Tom K Birkenhäger; Walter W van den Broek
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.635

2.  Effects of pulse width and electrode placement on the efficacy and cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy.

Authors:  Harold A Sackeim; Joan Prudic; Mitchell S Nobler; Linda Fitzsimons; Sarah H Lisanby; Nancy Payne; Robert M Berman; Eva-Lotta Brakemeier; Tarique Perera; D P Devanand
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Similar clinical improvement of depression using 0.5-ms and 1-ms pulse widths in bilateral electroconvulsive therapy.

Authors:  Aida de Arriba-Arnau; Virginia Soria; Neus Salvat-Pujol; José M Menchón; Mikel Urretavizcaya
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 5.270
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.