| Literature DB >> 32974542 |
Alberta Serwah Anning1, Godwin Kwakye-Nuako1, Elvis Ofori Ameyaw1, Mba-Tihssommah Mosore2,3, Kwame Kumi Asare1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous leishmaniasis causes physical disfigurement and impairment on affected individuals, however, little attention has been paid to it eradication. The situation of this neglected disease is complicated with the expansion of the non-human pathogenic Leishmania enriettii complex causing infection in humans. We have previously shown that the extract from Erythrophleum ivorense has leishmanicidal activity against promastigote stages of the L. enriettii complex isolate from Ghana and L eishmania donovani. The extract of E. ivorense has shown to have anti-inflammatory, wound-healing ability, antiallergic, antimalarial and antischistosomal activity. However, the concentration threshold of E. ivorense extract required for leishmanicidal activity against the emerging human pathogenic L. enriettii complex isolates is not clear. AIM: To test for the concentration threshold of E. ivorense extract required to obtain ideal leishmanicidal activity against the promastigote stage of human pathogenic L. enriettii complex isolates from Ghana.Entities:
Keywords: Cutaneous leishmaniasis; Erythrophleum ivorense; Ghana; Leishmania enriettii complex; leishmanicidal; promastigotes stage
Year: 2019 PMID: 32974542 PMCID: PMC7481739 DOI: 10.1099/acmi.0.000050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Access Microbiol ISSN: 2516-8290
The sensitivity and specificity of the concentration cutoffs of the E. ivorense leaf extract on L. enreittii promastigote inhibition.
|
Conc. cut off (µg ml−1) |
% sensitivity (95 % CI) |
% specificity (95 % CI) |
Likelihood ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
|
15.00 |
100.0 (54.07–100.0) |
16.67 (0.4211–64.12) |
1.200 |
|
30.50 |
83.33 (35.88–99.58) |
16.67 (0.4211–64.12) |
1.000 |
|
44.50 |
83.33 (35.88–99.58) |
33.33 (4.327–77.72) |
1.250 |
|
53.00 |
66.67 (22.28–95.67) |
33.33 (4.327–77.72) |
1.000 |
|
64.50 |
66.67 (22.28–95.6) |
50.00 (11.81–88.19) |
1.333 |
|
82.50 |
50.00 (11.81–88.19) |
50.00 (11.81–88.19) |
1.000 |
|
99.00 |
50.00 (11.81–88.19) |
66.67 (22.28–95.6) |
1.500 |
|
108.0 |
33.33 (4.327–77.72) |
66.67 (22.28–95.6) |
1.000 |
|
133.5 |
33.33 (4.327–77.72) |
83.33 (35.88–99.58) |
2.000 |
|
166.5 |
33.33 (4.327–77.72) |
100.0 (54.07–100.0) | |
|
215.5 |
16.67 (0.4211–64.12) |
100.0 (54.07–100.0) |
CI, confidencet interval.
Fig. 1.Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) showing the sensitivity and specificity of the concentration cut offs of the E. ivorense leaf extract on L. enriettii promastigote inhibition.
Time-dependent inhibition of L. enriettii promastigotes treated with the optimal concentration of 62.3 μg ml−1 of the E. ivorense leaf extract
|
% inhibition per time (cell ml−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time hr−1 |
mean±se |
95 % CI |
Huber’s estimator |
|
12 |
12.73±3.69 |
3.25–22.21 |
12.18 |
|
24 |
19.05±5.63 |
3.81–34.28 |
16.79 |
|
48 |
34.13±9.37 |
10.04–58.23 |
31.49 |
|
72 |
44.67±11.87 |
14.16–75.17 |
40.58 |
S.E, Standard error of the mean; CI, confidencet interval.
Fig. 2.Inhibition of L. enriettii promastigote at 62.3 μg ml−1 of E. ivorense leaf extract. (a) Box plot showing inhibition of L. enriettii promastigotes per time of the E. ivorense leaf extract treatment. (b) Control chart for L. enriettii promastigote inhibition per time of the E. ivorense leaf extract treatment.
Inhibition of L. enriettii promastigotes treated with serially diluted concentration of the E. ivorense leaf extract
|
% inhibition per conc. (cell ml−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Conc. µg ml−1 |
Mean±se |
95 % CI |
Huber’s estimator |
|
15.6 |
8.50±3.65 |
−3.12–20.12 |
8.07 |
|
31.2 |
12.53±3.27 |
2.12–22.93 |
11.44 |
|
62.3 |
15.93±3.18 |
5.81–26.04 |
15.83 |
|
125 |
30.93±8.78 |
2.99–58.85 |
29.11 |
|
250 |
41.58±11.03 |
6.48–76.67 |
40.65 |
|
500 |
56.43±13.65 |
12.99–99.86 |
55.65 |
S.E, Standard error of the mean; CI, confidencet interval.
Fig. 3.Inhibition of L. enriettii promastigotes per the serially diluted concentration of the E. ivorense leaf extract treatment. (a) Box plot showing promastigote inhibition per the concentration of E. ivorense leaf extract. (b) Control chart for promastigote inhibition per concentration of the E. ivorense leaf extract.
Comparable inhibitory effect of the optimized concentration of the E. ivorense leaf extract and amphotericin B against the L. enriettii complex isolate from Ghana and L. donovani
|
Cell ml−1 (% inhibition of promastigotes) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Amphotericin B |
×2 |
Monte Carlo (99 % CI) | |
|
|
77 (12.38) |
90 (24.67) |
1.012 |
0.356 (0.344–0.369) |
|
|
174 (36.42) |
258 (42.81) |
15.934** |
0.00 (0.00–0.00) |
* Significant (P<0.05); ** Significant (P<0.01); *** Highly significant (P<0.001).