Literature DB >> 32974488

Midterm complications of ROX arteriovenous coupler device, managed by targeted endovascular repair: a case report.

Sherif Sultan1,2, Mohamed K E Mustafa1, Nora Barrett1, Niamh Hynes2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resistant and uncontrolled hypertension prominently amplifies the risk of end-stage renal disease and fatal cardiovascular events. Therapeutic inertia, despite maximum tolerated anti-hypertensive medications, puts patients at high risk, thus non-pharmacologic therapies have been proposed. The ROX arteriovenous coupler (ROX, Medical Inc., San Clemente, CA, USA), initially developed for treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, exploits the biomechanical effects of diverting arterial blood into a low-resistance, high-compliance venous segment, thereby decreasing arterial vascular resistance and blood pressure (BP). CASE
SUMMARY: A 76-year-old male, non-smoker and non-diabetic with resistant primary hypertension presented to our institution with disabling claudication, lower limb swelling and right hip pain. He had concomitant saccular abdominal aortic and right iliac aneurysms. He had previously undergone renal denervation on two separate occasions yet continued to require increasing anti-hypertensive medications. He subsequently had an insertion of an ROX coupler device between his right external iliac artery and vein after failure of insertion into his left iliac system. He developed right hip and buttock pain and consequently underwent a total hip replacement and subsequent revision, which did not alleviate his symptoms. Ankle-brachial indices were reduced to 0.70 on the right limb and normal on the left. Insertion of the ROX coupler device was reversed with concomitant endovascular aortic repair. DISCUSSION: There is no clear consensus on reversal of the ROX coupler device. Endovascular aortic repair reversal of the ROX coupler device in this case was safe, effective, and improved symptoms including patient's BP control and limb symptoms.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case report; Claudication; DVT; EVAR; ROX arteriovenous coupler; Resistant hypertension

Year:  2020        PMID: 32974488      PMCID: PMC7501945          DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytaa185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep        ISSN: 2514-2119


  9 in total

Review 1.  Resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Aung Myat; Simon R Redwood; Ayesha C Qureshi; John A Spertus; Bryan Williams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-11-20

Review 2.  The ROX coupler: creation of a fixed iliac arteriovenous anastomosis for the treatment of uncontrolled systemic arterial hypertension, exploiting the physical properties of the arterial vasculature.

Authors:  John P Foran; Ajay K Jain; Ivan P Casserly; David E Kandzari; Krishna J Rocha-Singh; Adam Witkowski; Barry T Katzen; David Deaton; Peter Balmforth; Paul A Sobotka
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Central arteriovenous anastomosis for the treatment of patients with uncontrolled hypertension (the ROX CONTROL HTN study): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Melvin D Lobo; Paul A Sobotka; Alice Stanton; John R Cockcroft; Neil Sulke; Eamon Dolan; Markus van der Giet; Joachim Hoyer; Stephen S Furniss; John P Foran; Adam Witkowski; Andrzej Januszewicz; Danny Schoors; Konstantinos Tsioufis; Benno J Rensing; Benjamin Scott; G André Ng; Christian Ott; Roland E Schmieder
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The use of a novel ROX central arteriovenous fistula formation device in a patient with severe drug-resistant hypertension and prior aortic graft.

Authors:  Mark Hensey; Elizabeth Smyth; Elaine Gilroy; Joseph Galvin
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Creation of an iliac arteriovenous shunt lowers blood pressure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with hypertension.

Authors:  John Faul; Danny Schoors; Sofie Brouwers; Benjamin Scott; Andreas Jerrentrup; Joseph Galvin; Sandra Luitjens; Eamon Dolan
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Central Iliac Arteriovenous Anastomosis for Uncontrolled Hypertension: One-Year Results From the ROX CONTROL HTN Trial.

Authors:  Melvin D Lobo; Christian Ott; Paul A Sobotka; Manish Saxena; Alice Stanton; John R Cockcroft; Neil Sulke; Eamon Dolan; Markus van der Giet; Joachim Hoyer; Stephen S Furniss; John P Foran; Adam Witkowski; Andrzej Januszewicz; Danny Schoors; Konstantinos Tsioufis; Benno J Rensing; Benjamin Scott; G André Ng; Roland E Schmieder
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Robert M Carey; David A Calhoun; George L Bakris; Robert D Brook; Stacie L Daugherty; Cheryl R Dennison-Himmelfarb; Brent M Egan; John M Flack; Samuel S Gidding; Eric Judd; Daniel T Lackland; Cheryl L Laffer; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Steven M Smith; Sandra J Taler; Stephen C Textor; Tanya N Turan; William B White
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 8.  Arteriovenous anastomosis: is this the way to control hypertension?

Authors:  Amy E Burchell; Melvin D Lobo; Neil Sulke; Paul A Sobotka; Julian F R Paton
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Comparative risk of renal, cardiovascular, and mortality outcomes in controlled, uncontrolled resistant, and nonresistant hypertension.

Authors:  John J Sim; Simran K Bhandari; Jiaxiao Shi; Kristi Reynolds; David A Calhoun; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Steven J Jacobsen
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 10.612

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.