BACKGROUND: Adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapies is poor, particularly among low-income populations and racial minorities. This study tested a low-resource, brief telephonic health coaching intervention to improve PAP adherence. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of a quality improvement initiative in which English- and Spanish-speaking patients from a county-based public health system were randomly assigned to receive health coaching or usual care. An unlicensed, trained health coach called patients three times to resolve barriers to adherence. A per-protocol analysis was conducted for adherence measures collected by device modem at baseline and 30 days. RESULTS: Of 131 people for whom device data were available, 56 were randomized tohealth coaching and 75 to usual care. At baseline, 47.3% of patients had used their device at any time in the past 30 days, with a mean of 2 hours of use per night. At 30 days, adjusting for baseline, patients in the coaching arm were more likely than usual care patients to use their device (55.4% vs. 41.3%, p = 0.03), and they increased their use for 0.4 hours over usual care (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that a low-cost intervention could be effective at improving PAP adherence, even in a population known to have poor adherence and among long-term PAP users with poor adherence. Future research may examine whether a higher-touch intervention or one using videoconferencing yields greater improvements. This promising intervention warrants further study.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapies is poor, particularly among low-income populations and racial minorities. This study tested a low-resource, brief telephonic health coaching intervention to improve PAP adherence. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of a quality improvement initiative in which English- and Spanish-speaking patients from a county-based public health system were randomly assigned to receive health coaching or usual care. An unlicensed, trained health coach called patients three times to resolve barriers to adherence. A per-protocol analysis was conducted for adherence measures collected by device modem at baseline and 30 days. RESULTS: Of 131 people for whom device data were available, 56 were randomized to health coaching and 75 to usual care. At baseline, 47.3% of patients had used their device at any time in the past 30 days, with a mean of 2 hours of use per night. At 30 days, adjusting for baseline, patients in the coaching arm were more likely than usual care patients to use their device (55.4% vs. 41.3%, p = 0.03), and they increased their use for 0.4 hours over usual care (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that a low-cost intervention could be effective at improving PAP adherence, even in a population known to have poor adherence and among long-term PAP users with poor adherence. Future research may examine whether a higher-touch intervention or one using videoconferencing yields greater improvements. This promising intervention warrants further study.
Authors: Benjamin Ka Seng Thong; Grace Xin Yun Loh; Jia Jan Lim; Christina Jia Liang Lee; Shu Ning Ting; Hong Peng Li; Qing Yun Li Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-05-03