Literature DB >> 32972256

Sulphonamide inhibition profile of Staphylococcus aureus β-carbonic anhydrase.

Linda J Urbanski1, Silvia Bua2, Andrea Angeli2, Marianne Kuuslahti1, Vesa P Hytönen1,3, Claudiu T Supuran2, Seppo Parkkila1,3.   

Abstract

This paper presents the production and kinetic and inhibitory characterisation of β-carbonic anhydrase from the opportunistic bacterium Staphylococcus aureus (SauBCA). From the eight different carbonic anhydrase (CA) families known to date, humans have only the α-form, whereas many clinically relevant pathogens have β- and/or γ-form(s). Based on this discovery, β- and γ-CAs have been introduced as promising new anti-infective targets. The results of this study revealed that recombinant SauBCA possesses significant CO2 hydration activity with a kcat of 1.46 × 105 s-1 and a kcat/KM of 2.56 × 107 s- 1M-1. Its enzymatic function was inhibited by various sulphonamides in the nanomolar - micromolar range, and the Ki of acetazolamide was 628 nM. The best inhibitor was the clinically used sulfamide agent famotidine (Ki of 71 nM). The least efficient inhibitors were zonisamide and dorzolamide. Our work encourages further investigations of SauBCA in an attempt to discover novel drugs against staphylococcal infections.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Staphylococcus aureus ; inhibition; kinetics; sulphonamides; β-carbonic anhydrase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32972256      PMCID: PMC7534311          DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2020.1826942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem        ISSN: 1475-6366            Impact factor:   5.051


Introduction

Staphylococcal species represent a significant part of our microbiota, e.g. on our skin and in our mouth and gut. Most of these species are harmless, commensal bacteria that do not cause inflammation (e.g. S. epidermidis). However, one particular strain of staphylococci has been at the centre of attention since our first encounter with it over a century ago. Despite huge improvements in health care, Staphylococcus aureus has caused increasing morbidity and, in some cases, mortality,. Due to the emergence of multi-drug-resistant strains (collectively termed MRSA, i.e. methicillin-resistant S. aureus), treatment has remained particularly challenging. The first nosocomial MRSA emerged not too long after Ian Fleming discovered penicillin,, and more strains have emerged, causing it to be one of the most prominent causative agents of surgical-site infections and invasive bacterial diseases. In the past 20 years, S. aureus infections have increased dramatically, causing an increase in MRSA strains displaying resistance to penicillin-derived β-lactam antibiotics,. The antibiotic resistance of MRSA is based on the single gene mecA, which encodes a penicillin inactivating enzyme on the surface of the bacteria,. In addition, the virulence of staphylococci is based on their ability to attach to foreign bodies by specialised adhesins and form a biofilm to shield itself from antibiotics. MRSA is particularly resilient in hospital settings, where patients with diseases such as type I diabetes, immunodeficiencies or ongoing haemodialysis are at the greatest risk of acquiring the infection,,. Most cases occur through hospital personnel who are infected by their own reservoir or by infected patients,. The infection requires physical contact and is activated when the skin or mucosal barrier is breached, allowing the bacteria to enter adjoining tissues or the bloodstream. Infections vary from mild skin lesions to severe cases of sepsis, endocarditis, osteomyelitis and pneumonia. Not all individuals show signs of S. aureus infection; hence, it can easily be passed on unnoticed via the skin in addition to from surgical instrumentation and other inanimate surfaces,. Novel innovative therapies are not only needed but also quickly becoming a necessity as the number of antibiotic-resistant pathogen strains increases. Scientists worldwide are thus exploring novel strategies for the prevention of these most threatening pathogenic infections. Among the promising biomolecular targets are carbonic anhydrases (CAs), a group of metalloenzymes found in all lifeforms. These vitally important enzymes catalyse a reversible reaction in which CO2 is converted to bicarbonate ions and protons. This simple reaction is responsible for numerous vital cellular functions, such acid-base homeostasis, CO2 transportation, and photosynthesis. Among the eight evolutionarily divergent but functionally convergent CA gene families (α, β, γ, δ, ζ, η, θ, and ι), humans have only the α-forms,. Interestingly, numerous pathogens have been identified with only β- and/or γ-CA genes in their genome. This has been regarded as a promising starting point for discovering novel, specific anti-infectives against pathogens. The fundamental differences discovered between the active sites of different CA families support the idea of specifically targeting β- and/or γ-CAs with minimal effects on human α-CAs. Numerous studies have been conducted demonstrating the efficiency of sulphonamides and anions as CA inhibitors (CAIs). Detailed characterisation of druggable CAs is considered a prerequisite for the design of more specific and efficient CAIs. To date, several crystal structures of pathogenic β-CAs have been solved and can consequently be exploited for more efficient CAI design. Such structure-based design allows for in vivo targeted therapeutics against pathogenic diseases without the disadvantage of affecting the human or other mammalian CAs. In the present study, we produced and isolated a novel β-CA from S. aureus (SauBCA) as a recombinant protein and tested its kinetic properties and inhibition profile against several known sulphonamides. Our results demonstrate that SauBCA represents a druggable enzyme target that should be further tested both in vitro and in vivo using different classes of potential CA inhibitors.

Materials and methods

Protein production

The SauBCA gene, obtained from the Universal Protein Resource Database (UniProt, protein entry EZX15767), was cloned into the expression vector pBVboostFG by GeneArt (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany). The synthesised insert was composed of Gateway-compatible recombination sites (attL1 and attL2), Shine-Dalgarno and Kozak sequences, N-terminal 6× His-tag with surrounding spacer regions (MSTT and ATAIPTT), SauBCA, and a thrombin cleavage site (LVPRGS). Chemically competent E. coli (OneShot® BL21 Star™ (DE3) cells, #C601003, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were transformed according to the Thermo Fisher Scientific OneShot® BL21(DE3) competent cells manual (part no. 28–0182). The culture medium used was Luria-Bertani (LB) supplemented with 10 mg/mL gentamicin (1:1000, v/v). The cells were grown in a fermenter at 28 °C for 12 h and subsequently induced by adding 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-isopropyl-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). After another 12 h of culture at 25 °C, the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4000 g for 40 min at 4 °C and mechanically disrupted with an EmulsiFlex-C3 homogeniser (AVESTIN, Canada). Subsequently, the cells were centrifuged at 13000 g for 20 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was mixed with Protino® Nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni2+-NTA) agarose affinity chromatography resin (Macherey-Nagel GmbH Co., Germany) and 50 mM Na2HPO4, 0.5 M NaCl and 50 mM imidazole binding buffer (BB; pH 8.0). The incubation took place for 2 h at room temperature (RT) with gentle agitation, followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C without agitation. The resin was loaded into a chromatography column with an EMD Millipore™ vacuum filtering flask (Merck, #XX1004705) and washed generously with BB. The protein was eluted from the column with 50 mM Na2HPO4, 0.5 M NaCl and 350 mM imidazole (pH 7.0). After elution, the eluted fractions were analysed with reducing sodium dodecyl sulphate gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) using a 12% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel and visualised with PageBlue protein staining solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #24620). The polypeptide bands on SDS-PAGE were used to identify the protein by means of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS, Meilahti Clinical Proteomics Core Facility, University of Helsinki, Finland). A 6× His-tag was enzymatically cleaved using thrombin (#RECOMT, Sigma-Aldrich) according to the Thrombin CleanClive™ kit manual instructions (Sigma-Aldrich). The tag was separated from the core protein with Ni2+-NTA affinity chromatography as mentioned above. Prior to further characterisation, the buffer was exchanged for 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5).

Kinetics and inhibition studies

An Applied Photophysics stopped-flow instrument was used for assaying CA-catalysed CO2 hydration activity. Phenol red (at a concentration of 0.2 mM) was used as the pH indicator at the absorbance maximum of 557 nm with 20 mM TRIS (pH 8.4) as the buffer with 20 mM Na2SO4 (for maintaining constant ionic strength) and following the initial rates of the CA-catalysed CO2 hydration reaction for over the period of 10 − 100 s. The CO2 concentrations ranged from 1.7 to 17 mM for the determination of the kinetic parameters and sulphonamide inhibition constants. Six traces of the initial 5 − 10% of the reaction were used to determine the initial velocity. The uncatalysed rates were determined in the same manner and subtracted from the total observed rates. A stock solution of inhibitor (0.1 mM) was prepared in distilled-deionized water, and dilutions of up to 0.01 nM were prepared thereafter with distilled-deionized water. Inhibitor (I) and enzyme (E) solutions were preincubated together for 15 min at RT prior to the assay to allow formation of the E − I complex. Inhibition constants were obtained by using the Cheng-Prusoff equation and nonlinear least squares methods (with PRISM 3) and are presented as the means from at least three different determinations. Kinetic constants were obtained using Lineweaver-Burke plots as reported earlier.

Results and discussion

A single β-CA enzyme of S. aureus was identified from the UniProt database and named SauBCA. The enzyme was successfully expressed in E. coli and purified by affinity chromatography. SDS-PAGE was used to monitor the purification process and successful cleavage of the His-tag. The tag was cleaved prior to further characterisation experiments. The gel from SDS-PAGE was stained with PageBlue and is shown in Figure 1. The relative molecular mass of the major band seen on the gel after His-tag removal corresponded to approximately 21 kDa. The theoretical molecular mass of SauBCA was calculated to be 21.1 kDa, suggesting that the purification procedure yielded the correct protein. This was further confirmed by MS/MS analysis, where three major polypeptides were analysed and identified as SauBCA. The relatively strong ∼52 kDa polypeptide seemed to represent a dimeric form of the protein.
Figure 1.

SDS-PAGE of the purified SauBCA with and without the His-tag. The polypeptides marked with arrows were subjected to MS/MS analysis and identified as SauBCA.

SDS-PAGE of the purified SauBCA with and without the His-tag. The polypeptides marked with arrows were subjected to MS/MS analysis and identified as SauBCA.

Kinetics

The obtained kinetic parameters for SauBCA are shown in Table 1 together with human α-CA isoforms and other representative β-CAs for comparison. Kinetic analysis of SauBCA revealed that it is a moderately efficient enzyme with a k of 1.46 × 105 s−1 and k of 2.56 × 107 s−1M−1. SauBCA showed kinetic properties fairly similar to several human CA isozymes, such as CA I, CA VA, CA VI, CA XII, CA XIII, and CA XIV. Notably, the k value of SauBCA was identical to that of hCA XIII, whereas it was the most different from the clinically relevant isozymes hCA II and hCA IX, as well as to the low activity enzyme hCA III. Similar kinetics were observed with the β-CAs from Burkholderia pseudomallei and Flaveria bidentis. As seen in Table 1, the binding affinities of SauBCA and Burkholderia pseudomallei β-CA to acetazolamide (AAZ) are rather similar, whereas the inhibition constant for Flaveria bidentis β-CA is very different. This finding suggests major structural differences in the active sites of these β-CA enzymes.
Table 1.

Kinetic data of SauBCA and the inhibition results for the standard sulphonamide inhibitor acetazolamide (AAZ). All human isozymes, and two other β-CAs,, with corresponding properties are shown for comparison. The k and k values are rounded to one decimal place.

Enzymekcatkcat/KMKi (AAZ)
(s-1)(s-1M-1)(nM)
SauBCA1.5 × 1052.6 × 107628
hCA I2.0 × 1055.0 × 107250
hCA II1.4 × 1061.5 × 10812
hCA III1.3 × 1042.5 × 105240000
hCA IV1.1 × 1065.1 × 10774
hCA VA2.9 × 1052.9 × 10763
hCA VB9.5 × 1059.8 × 10754
hCA VI3.4 × 1054.9 × 10711
hCA VII9.5 × 1058.3 × 1072.5
hCA IX1.1 × 1061.5 × 10816
hCA XII4.2 × 1053.5 × 1075.7
hCA XIII1.5 × 1051.1 × 10716
hCA XIV3.1 × 1053.9 × 10741
Burkholderia pseudomallei β-CA1.6 × 1053.4 × 107745
Flaveria bidentis β-CA1.2 × 1057.5 × 10627
Kinetic data of SauBCA and the inhibition results for the standard sulphonamide inhibitor acetazolamide (AAZ). All human isozymes, and two other β-CAs,, with corresponding properties are shown for comparison. The k and k values are rounded to one decimal place.

Inhibition studies

A set of clinically used sulphonamide drugs and sulphonamide analogues were investigated against SauBCA. The obtained inhibition constants can be seen in Table 2, along with the results from human α-CA isoform II for comparison. The molecular structures of sulphonamides 1–24 and of the clinically used agents tested in this study are shown in Figure 2.
Table 2.

Inhibition data for SauBCA and hCA II with sulphonamide analogues 1–24 and selected clinically used agents.

Ki* (nM)
InhibitorSauBCAhCA IIa
1355300
2409240
3958
483320
5193170
6253160
79360
895110
97540
1020254
118163
127975
1341760
1455319
1561980
1660394
17232125
1855546
1990933
20922
218511
228346
239233
249630
AAZ62812
MZA86314
EZA6988
DZA9099
BRZ8153
BZA5019
TPM46610
ZNS455135
SLP80740
IND58815
VLX50943
CLX87121
SLT8249
SAC6675959
HCT593290
FAM7158
EPA538917

*Mean from three different assays measured by the stopped-flow technique. Errors were in the range of ±5–10% of the reported values (data not shown). aHuman recombinant isozyme, from Ref..

Figure 2.

The molecular structures of the sulphonamide analogues used in this study (1–24) as well as selected clinically used agents.

The molecular structures of the sulphonamide analogues used in this study (1–24) as well as selected clinically used agents. Inhibition data for SauBCA and hCA II with sulphonamide analogues 1–24 and selected clinically used agents. *Mean from three different assays measured by the stopped-flow technique. Errors were in the range of ±5–10% of the reported values (data not shown). aHuman recombinant isozyme, from Ref.. SauBCA was successfully inhibited by selected sulphonamide analogues 1–24 and standard sulphonamide inhibitors AAZ-epacadostat (EPA) in the nanomolar range. In general, all studied compounds resulted in strong to medium K values spanning between 71 and 4551 nM. The most efficient inhibition was obtained with sulphonamide analogues 9, 11, 12, 21, 22, 24 and famotidine (FAM). Their inhibition affinities were < 100 nM, which indicates strong inhibition against the SauBCA catalytic function. The least efficient inhibitors were the following sulphonamides: zonisamide (ZNS), dorzolamide (DZA), 19, celecoxib (CLX), methazolamide (MZA), sulthiame (SLT), and brinzolamide (BRZ). Despite showing the lowest efficiency in this study, their inhibition can still be regarded as medium/medium-weak. AAZ ranked 29th out of 41 studied sulphonamides with a K of 628 nM. In general, the clinically used sulphonamides showed inferior inhibition compared to designed sulphonamide analogues 1–24, except for FAM, which was in fact the most effective inhibitor. However, FAM (together with EPA) are the only sulfamide derivatives in the series, and FAM has a quite diverse scaffold compared to the other clinically used drugs investigated here. It has a large aliphatic fragment present in the structure, which is absent in the other compounds investigated in this study. Future work entails the design of more potent inhibitors against SauBCA.

Conclusion

In the current study, we successfully produced recombinant SauBCA and investigated its kinetics and inhibition profile with sulphonamides. The data showed that SauBCA possesses significant catalytic activity with a k of 1.46 × 105 s−1 and k of 2.56 × 107 s−1 M−1. The successful inhibition of SauBCA with selected sulphonamides in the nanomolar range warrants further investigation of potent SauBCA inhibitors for developing future anti-infective agents against staphylococcal infections. One of the most effective inhibitors detected in the study was famotidine, a clinically used antiulcer drug, with a K of 71 nM.
  39 in total

Review 1.  Carbonic anhydrases: novel therapeutic applications for inhibitors and activators.

Authors:  Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, risk factors, complications, and management.

Authors:  Yoav Keynan; Ethan Rubinstein
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 3.  Beta-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: the adaptive resistance of a plastic genome.

Authors:  C C S Fuda; J F Fisher; S Mobashery
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 4.  (In)organic anions as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors.

Authors:  Giuseppina De Simone; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  J Inorg Biochem       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.155

5.  Thylakoid luminal θ-carbonic anhydrase critical for growth and photosynthesis in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum.

Authors:  Sae Kikutani; Kensuke Nakajima; Chikako Nagasato; Yoshinori Tsuji; Ai Miyatake; Yusuke Matsuda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Characterization and inhibition studies of the most active beta-carbonic anhydrase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Rv3588c.

Authors:  Fabrizio Carta; Alfonso Maresca; Adrian Suarez Covarrubias; Sherry L Mowbray; T Alwyn Jones; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 7.  Carbonic anhydrases as drug targets--an overview.

Authors:  Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review.

Authors:  Axel Kramer; Ingeborg Schwebke; Günter Kampf
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  A multipurpose vector system for the screening of libraries in bacteria, insect and mammalian cells and expression in vivo.

Authors:  Olli H Laitinen; Kari J Airenne; Vesa P Hytönen; Erik Peltomaa; Anssi J Mähönen; Thomas Wirth; Miia M Lind; Kari A Mäkelä; Pyry I Toivanen; Diana Schenkwein; Tommi Heikura; Henri R Nordlund; Markku S Kulomaa; Seppo Ylä-Herttuala
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Crystal structure of carbonic anhydrase CaNce103p from the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans.

Authors:  Jiří Dostál; Jiří Brynda; Jan Blaha; Stanislav Macháček; Olga Heidingsfeld; Iva Pichová
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2018-10-26
View more
  6 in total

1.  Anion inhibition studies of the α-carbonic anhydrases from Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Alessio Nocentini; Chad S Hewitt; Margaret D Mastrolorenzo; Daniel P Flaherty; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 5.051

2.  Coumarins effectively inhibit bacterial α-carbonic anhydrases.

Authors:  Simone Giovannuzzi; Chad S Hewitt; Alessio Nocentini; Clemente Capasso; Daniel P Flaherty; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.051

3.  Staphylococcus aureus Genomes Harbor Only MpsAB-Like Bicarbonate Transporter but Not Carbonic Anhydrase as Dissolved Inorganic Carbon Supply System.

Authors:  Sook-Ha Fan; Elisa Liberini; Friedrich Götz
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-11-03

4.  Dithiocarbamates effectively inhibit the α-carbonic anhydrase from Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Simone Giovannuzzi; Nader S Abutaleb; Chad S Hewitt; Fabrizio Carta; Alessio Nocentini; Mohamed N Seleem; Daniel P Flaherty; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.051

5.  Activation studies with amino acids and amines of a β-carbonic anhydrase from Mammaliicoccus (Staphylococcus) sciuri previously annotated as Staphylococcus aureus (SauBCA) carbonic anhydrase.

Authors:  Andrea Angeli; Linda J Urbański; Clemente Capasso; Seppo Parkkila; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.756

6.  Biological investigation of N-methyl thiosemicarbazones as antimicrobial agents and bacterial carbonic anhydrases inhibitors.

Authors:  Ilaria D'Agostino; Githa Elizabeth Mathew; Paola Angelini; Roberto Venanzoni; Giancarlo Angeles Flores; Andrea Angeli; Simone Carradori; Beatrice Marinacci; Luigi Menghini; Mohamed A Abdelgawad; Mohammed M Ghoneim; Bijo Mathew; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.051

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.