Literature DB >> 32971129

p53 immunostaining cannot be used to predict TP53 mutations in gastric cancer: results from a large Central European cohort.

Isabelle Schoop1, Saffiyeh Saboor Maleki2, Hans-Michael Behrens1, Sandra Krüger1, Jochen Haag1, Christoph Röcken3.   

Abstract

Four molecular subgroups of gastric cancer (GC) have been proposed, ie, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive, microsatellite instable, chromosomal instable (CIN), and genomically stable GC. Based on the complex relationship between chromosomal instability and TP53 mutational status, we hypothesized that the typical clinicopathological characteristics caused by chromosomal instability are correlated with the p53 expression that is detected by immunohistochemistry. Four hundred sixty-seven whole-tissue sections of patients with therapy-naive GC were stained with anti-p53 antibody. The histoscore and staining pattern were analyzed for each slide. Different algorithms of immunohistochemistry evaluation were formed and correlated with clinicopathological characteristics. The algorithms were validated by assessing the mutational status of TP53 in 111 cases. Four hundred forty-two GCs were p53 positive, and 25 were negative, including 414 GCs with a homogeneous pattern and 53 GCs with a heterogeneous staining pattern. There was no correlation with overall or tumor-specific survival. In comparison with clinicopathological characteristics, the algorithm high versus low showed correlations with microsatellite instability, hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET), and TP53 mutational status. The algorithm Q1/Q4 versus Q2/Q3 appeared to be correlated with the phenotype as per the Laurén classification, microsatellite instability, EBV status, and p53 expression pattern. The algorithm <90% = 0 and <50% = 3+ versus ≥90% = 0 or ≥50% = 3+ showed correlations with the EBV status, microsatellite instability, grading, and p53 expression pattern. The algorithm homogeneous versus heterogeneous did not correlate with any clinicopathological characteristic. Our results showed that the immunohistochemistry of p53, TP53 mutational status, and CIN subtype were connected. However, different algorithms for p53 immunohistochemical evaluation cannot be used to predict TP53 mutations in CIN GCs in individual cases.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromosomal instability; Epstein-Barr virus; Gastric cancer; Microsatellite instability; p53

Year:  2020        PMID: 32971129     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2020.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  7 in total

Review 1.  Predictive biomarkers in gastric cancer.

Authors:  C Röcken
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.322

2.  High expression of PIG11 correlates with poor prognosis in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Juan Gu; Shu Zhang; Xin He; Sufang Chen; Yan Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  TP53 Co-Mutational Features and NGS-Calibrated Immunohistochemistry Threshold in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Ruili Yu; Tingyi Sun; Xianwei Zhang; Zhen Li; Yang Xu; Kaihua Liu; Yuqian Shi; Xue Wu; Yang Shao; Lingfei Kong
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Multiscale heterogeneity in gastric adenocarcinoma evolution is an obstacle to precision medicine.

Authors:  Christoph Röcken; Anu Amallraja; Christine Halske; Luka Opasic; Arne Traulsen; Hans-Michael Behrens; Sandra Krüger; Anne Liu; Jochen Haag; Jan-Hendrik Egberts; Philip Rosenstiel; Tobias Meißner
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 11.117

5.  Evaluation of Tumor DNA Sequencing Results in Patients with Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma Stratified by TP53 Mutation Status.

Authors:  Anthony C Wood; Yonghong Zhang; Qianxing Mo; Ling Cen; Jacques Fontaine; Sarah E Hoffe; Jessica Frakes; Sean P Dineen; Jose M Pimiento; Christine M Walko; Rutika Mehta
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-04-05

6.  Clinical significance of p53 protein expression and TP53 variation status in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kyoung Min Kim; Ae-Ri Ahn; Ho Sung Park; Kyu Yun Jang; Woo Sung Moon; Myoung Jae Kang; Gi Won Ha; Min Ro Lee; Myoung Ja Chung
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  p53 Immunohistochemistry Patterns Are Surrogate Biomarkers for TP53 Mutations in Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  Junjie Li; Jing Wang; Dan Su; Xiu Nie; Yueping Liu; Lianghong Teng; Junyi Pang; Huanwen Wu; Zhiyong Liang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.260

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.