Literature DB >> 32970524

Evaluation of a Mainstream Model of Genetic Testing for Men With Prostate Cancer.

Tahlia Scheinberg1,2,3, Annabel Goodwin4,5, Emilia Ip5,6, Anthony Linton3,4, Blossom Mak1,2,3, David P Smith3,7,8, Martin R Stockler1,3,4,9, Madeleine C Strach1,3, Ben Tran10,11,12,13, Alison L Young3,14, Alison Y Zhang1,3,15, Kate L Mahon1,2,3,9, Lisa G Horvath1,2,3,9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the approximately 12% with inherited cancer predisposition, all men with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) should be offered germline genetic testing. This guides treatment choices and impacts cancer prevention in the family. Limited genetic services globally present a barrier to testing. This study tested a potential solution, "mainstreaming," where counseling and testing are performed by the patient's oncologist. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with mPC at three Australian sites were offered germline genetic testing at their medical oncology appointment. Panel testing (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CHEK2, EPCAM, FANCA, HOXB13, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, NBN, PALB2, PMS2, RAD51D, and TP53) was performed on saliva/blood (Invitae, San Francisco, CA). Primary outcomes were clinician and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included mutation rates and resource allocation.
RESULTS: Of 66 men offered testing, 63 (95%) accepted. Four pathogenic variants were identified (two BRCA2, one NBN, and one MSH6). Fifty patients and nine clinicians completed questionnaires. Satisfaction was high. All patients were pleased to have had testing overall, 98% (46 of 47) to have had testing at their usual oncology appointment, and all to receive results from their usual specialist, rather than a separate genetics appointment. A total of 88% (7 of 8) of clinicians felt confident, and all were satisfied with mainstreaming. Mainstreaming was resource efficient, requiring 87% fewer genetic consultations than traditional genetic counseling.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that mainstreaming of men with mPC is feasible, resource efficient, and satisfactory for clinicians and patients. Widespread implementation as standard of care would facilitate timely access to genetic testing for men with mPC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32970524     DOI: 10.1200/OP.20.00399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract        ISSN: 2688-1527


  7 in total

1.  Healthcare professionals' perspectives on implementation of universal tumor DNA testing in ovarian cancer patients: multidisciplinary focus groups.

Authors:  Margreet G E M Ausems; Joanne A de Hullu; Vera M Witjes; Jozé C C Braspenning; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Yvonne H C M Smolders; Dorien M A Hermkens; Marian J E Mourits; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  Germline genetics of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hiba M Khan; Heather H Cheng
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 4.012

Review 3.  Considerations on the identification and management of metastatic prostate cancer patients with DNA repair gene alterations in the Canadian context.

Authors:  Michael P Kolinsky; Karen Y Niederhoffer; Edmond M Kwan; Sebastien J Hotte; Zineb Hamilou; Steven M Yip; Kim N Chi; Alexander W Wyatt; Fred Saad
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.052

Review 4.  The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kyra Bokkers; Michiel Vlaming; Ellen G Engelhardt; Ronald P Zweemer; Inge M van Oort; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; Eveline M A Bleiker; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Novel Germline Mutations in a Cohort of Men with Familial Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Romy Mondschein; Damien Bolton; David Clouston; James Dowty; Liam Kavanagh; Declan Murphy; Prudence Scott; Renea A Taylor; Heather Thorne
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 6.  The promising role of new molecular biomarkers in prostate cancer: from coding and non-coding genes to artificial intelligence approaches.

Authors:  Ana Paula Alarcón-Zendejas; Anna Scavuzzo; Miguel A Jiménez-Ríos; Rosa M Álvarez-Gómez; Rogelio Montiel-Manríquez; Clementina Castro-Hernández; Miguel A Jiménez-Dávila; Delia Pérez-Montiel; Rodrigo González-Barrios; Francisco Jiménez-Trejo; Cristian Arriaga-Canon; Luis A Herrera
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 5.455

7.  The evolving role of germline genetic testing and management in prostate cancer: Report from the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre international retreat.

Authors:  Roderick Clark; Miran Kenk; Kristen McAlpine; Emily Thain; Kirsten M Farncombe; Colin C Pritchard; Robert Nussbaum; Alexander W Wyatt; Johann de Bono; Danny Vesprini; Yvonne Bombard; Justin Lorentz; Steven Narod; Raymond Kim; Neil Fleshner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.862

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.