Literature DB >> 32970237

High lead impedances requiring revision during vagal nerve stimulator generator replacement.

Pouya Entezami1, John W German2, Matthew A Adamo2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy is among the growing options in the treatment of intractable epilepsy. The phenomenon of surprise lead impedance issues found at the time of surgery resulting in unplanned lead revision is a challenge with this type of device. We reviewed our experience with VNS revisions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all adult and pediatric patients between January 2009 and September 2018 who underwent surgery for VNS therapy, including revision surgery. Office and operative notes were reviewed to obtain the indications and operative details for VNS placement.
RESULTS: A total of 570 operations were reviewed. The indication was intractable epilepsy in all cases. Primary implantation was performed in 232 patients, while the remaining 338 cases were revision cases of various natures. Surprise high lead impedance was found in 10 (3%) of these cases, resulting in a significantly increased complexity of surgery in those instances.
CONCLUSION: Lead impedance issues can be caused by disconnection, electrode fracture, hardware failure, or tissue scarring but ultimately require a more extended surgery than may be initially planned. Anticipating the potential for a more extensive operation than a simple generator replacement may prevent perioperative frustrations on both sides.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epilepsy surgery; Hardware failure; Implantation; Stimulation; Vagal nerve stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32970237     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04585-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  7 in total

1.  Long-term Expectations of Vagus Nerve Stimulation: A Look at Battery Replacement and Revision Surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan D Couch; Arthur M Gilman; Werner K Doyle
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Vagus nerve stimulation after lead revision.

Authors:  Brian J Dlouhy; Steven V Viljoen; David K Kung; Timothy W Vogel; Mark A Granner; Matthew A Howard; Hiroto Kawasaki
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Vagal Nerve Stimulator Malfunction with Change in Neck Position: Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Erin D'Agostino; Vyacheslav Makler; David F Bauer
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Revision of vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) electrodes: review and report on use of ultra-sharp monopolar tip.

Authors:  Wai Hoe Ng; Elizabeth Donner; Cristina Go; Amal Abou-Hamden; James T Rutka
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Vagus nerve stimulation: Surgical technique of implantation and revision and related morbidity.

Authors:  Flavio Giordano; Anna Zicca; Carmen Barba; Renzo Guerrini; Lorenzo Genitori
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 6.  An institutional experience with cervical vagus nerve trunk stimulation for medically refractory epilepsy: rationale, technique, and outcome.

Authors:  A P Amar; C N Heck; M L Levy; T Smith; C M DeGiorgio; S Oviedo; M L Apuzzo
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 7.  Vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of refractory epilepsy.

Authors:  Andrew H Milby; Casey H Halpern; Gordon H Baltuch
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.620

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.