Literature DB >> 32970102

Utility of Pupillary Light Reflex Metrics as a Physiologic Biomarker for Adolescent Sport-Related Concussion.

Christina L Master1,2,3, Olivia E Podolak2, Kenneth J Ciuffreda4, Kristina B Metzger2, Nabin R Joshi4, Catherine C McDonald2,3,5, Susan S Margulies6, Matthew F Grady1,3, Kristy B Arbogast2,3.   

Abstract

Importance: Concussion diagnosis remains clinical, without objective diagnostic tests available for adolescents. Known deficits in visual accommodation and autonomic function after concussion make the pupillary light reflex (PLR) a promising target as an objective physiological biomarker for concussion. Objective: To determine the potential utility of PLR metrics as physiological biomarkers for concussion. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective cohort of adolescent athletes between ages 12 and 18 years recruited between August 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018. The study took place at a specialty concussion program and private suburban high school and included healthy control individuals (n = 134) and athletes with a diagnosis of sport-related concussion (SRC) (n = 98). Analysis was completed June 30, 2020. Exposures: Sports-related concussion and pupillometry assessments. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pupillary light reflex metrics (maximum and minimum pupillary diameter, peak and average constriction/dilation velocity, percentage constriction, and time to 75% pupillary redilation [T75]).
Results: Pupillary light reflex metrics of 134 healthy control individuals and 98 athletes with concussion were obtained a median of 12.0 days following injury (interquartile range [IQR], 5.0-18.0 days). Eight of 9 metrics were significantly greater among athletes with concussion after Bonferroni correction (maximum pupil diameter: 4.83 mm vs 4.01 mm; difference, 0.82; 99.44% CI, 0.53-1.11; minimum pupil diameter: 2.96 mm vs 2.63 mm; difference, 0.33; 99.4% CI, 0.18-0.48; percentage constriction: 38.23% vs 33.66%; difference, 4.57; 99.4% CI, 2.60-6.55; average constriction velocity: 3.08 mm/s vs 2.50 mm/s; difference, 0.58; 99.4% CI, 0.36-0.81; peak constriction velocity: 4.88 mm/s vs 3.91 mm/s; difference, 0.97; 99.4% CI, 0.63-1.31; average dilation velocity, 1.32 mm/s vs 1.22 mm/s; difference, 0.10; 99.4% CI, 0.00-0.20; peak dilation velocity: 1.83 mm/s vs 1.64 mm/s; difference, 0.19; 99.4% CI, 0.07-0.32; and T75: 1.81 seconds vs 1.51 seconds; difference, 0.30; 0.10-0.51). In exploratory analyses, sex-based differences were observed, with girls with concussion exhibiting longer T75 (1.96 seconds vs 1.63 seconds; difference, 0.33; 99.4% CI, 0.02-0.65). Among healthy control individuals, diminished PLR metrics (eg, smaller maximum pupil size 3.81 mm vs 4.22 mm; difference, -0.41; 99.4% CI, -0.77 to 0.05) were observed after exercise. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that enhancement of PLR metrics characterize acute adolescent concussion, while exercise produced smaller pupil sizes and overall slowing of PLR metrics, presumably associated with fatigue. Quantifiable measures of the PLR may serve in the future as objective physiologic biomarkers for concussion in the adolescent athlete.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32970102      PMCID: PMC7516812          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.3466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  9 in total

1.  Eye Tracking Metrics Differences among Uninjured Adolescents and Those with Acute or Persistent Post-Concussion Symptoms.

Authors:  Divya Jain; Kristy B Arbogast; Catherine C McDonald; Olivia E Podolak; Susan S Margulies; Kristina B Metzger; David R Howell; Mitchell M Scheiman; Christina L Master
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.106

Review 2.  Headache and Autonomic Dysfunction: a Review.

Authors:  Courtney Iser; Karissa Arca
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.030

3.  Mobile Smartphone-Based Digital Pupillometry Curves in the Diagnosis of Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Lynn B McGrath; Jessica Eaton; Isaac Joshua Abecassis; Anthony Maxin; Cory Kelly; Randall M Chesnut; Michael R Levitt
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  Relationship between Visually Evoked Effects and Concussion in Youth.

Authors:  Carlyn Patterson Gentile; Geoffrey K Aguirre; Kristy B Arbogast; Christina L Master
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.869

5.  Vergence, accommodation, and visual tracking in children and adolescents evaluated in a multidisciplinary concussion clinic.

Authors:  Emily K Wiecek; Tawna L Roberts; Ankoor S Shah; Aparna Raghuram
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 1.984

6.  Disparity vergence differences between typically occurring and concussion-related convergence insufficiency pediatric patients.

Authors:  Tara L Alvarez; Chang Yaramothu; Mitchell Scheiman; Arlene Goodman; Susan A Cotter; Kristine Huang; Angela M Chen; Matthew Grady; Anne E Mozel; Olivia E Podolak; Chris G Koutures; Christina L Master
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.984

7.  Daily Morning Blue Light Therapy for Post-mTBI Sleep Disruption: Effects on Brain Structure and Function.

Authors:  Adam C Raikes; Natalie S Dailey; Brittany Forbeck; Anna Alkozei; William D S Killgore
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Brain trauma impacts retinal processing: photoreceptor pathway interactions in traumatic light sensitivity.

Authors:  Christopher W Tyler; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  The Expanding Role of Quantitative Pupillometry in the Evaluation and Management of Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Jason H Boulter; Margaret M Shields; Melissa R Meister; Gregory Murtha; Brian P Curry; Bradley A Dengler
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.003

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.